The Official December 2014 Study Group Forum

[ErgoSum]

I also find it funny that OP had such enthusiasm, but hasn't been on TLS since March.

I'm a septemberer but this made me lol

btw, I enjoy your guys' September Thread. Good laughs good laughs.

Well if 9/27 sucks maybe I'll join you all in here

[jrdavila09]

Also.....

Are you guys applying this cycle or waiting till the next one?

This cycle! Can't afford to take another year off. Hopefully I get a 160+ to get into SMU for next fall!

[Rigo]

[msp8]

Looks good, Dirigo. I'll do something similar, though going heavier in Oct and lighter in Nov.

[jrdavila09]

Not going to lie... I'm stealing that schedule... haha

[Rigo]

[nlee10]

.

[Rigo]

[mist4bison]

[Rigo]

[Adrian Monk]

anybody here already here registrered for dec? im taking the sep, and wondering if i will be able to sign up for dec after getting my score, or whether i should do it now? there will not be a scenario where i would not be able to sign up for dec right? like its full or whatever

[Rigo]

[LSATgotrocked]

Hey everyone,

December taker checking in. I am basically drilling 1-40 right now LG, RC, and LR. However, I need some help spacing out PTs with my drilling. Taking out Tuesdays and Thursdays, does anyone have a recommendation/ care to post a schedule similar to the one recently posted for PT 41-73(which will be released)? It would be greatly appreciated to get other people's opinions on how I should spread them out.

Thanks.

[Lacoste]

Yesterday I got to spend the day at LSAC's Law Forum in Chicago. I was actually surprised at how many school reps were there. There were schools that I've never heard of before. Incidentally, there was one LSAC test writer who had a introductory workshop on the LSAT. He was basically talking shit about all the prep companies and how they all have, according to him, a magical formula or method to approaching the sections of the LSAT. I was also disgusted when he told stated that he has a colleague who does logic games without any diagramming... back on the grind tomorrow.

[nlee10]

.

[msp8]

Sure. It's possible. Everyone learns at a different pace, but it's entirely learnable stuff.

It wouldn't be awful if you weren't scoring that way in a couple of weeks, however. And it'd depend on how much time you spent on it all and how effective that time was used, of course.

[Rigo]

[nlee10]

.

[downbeat14]

.

[msp8]

Thanks guys! As of late, I've been drilling mainly LR using Manhattan LR + Cambridge Packets in addition to stated LG Game type. I am happy to report that I feel A LOT more confident in LR. Now I will be shifting the emphasis onto LG and hope to master the fundamentals so that I can start consistently PT'ing in October. Let's do this guys!

Good to hear! What has the progress been like with LR? I still have issues with LR on timing, so I'm trying to build a sense of how people improve timing (or otherwise, since timing is an extension of familiarity).

[nlee10]

.

[Rigo]

[Rigo]

[alpha kenny body]

I like the PT schedule, however, there should be a tiered system wherein one day you're doing a test in the 40's and the next is a test in the 70's. The tests get markedly different past the 50's and you should be familiar with them as soon as possible to address any differences. Other than that, I'll probably adopt one similar, except more time for drilling and blind review.

[Rigo]