How'd it go? Forum

[s0ph1e2007]

What wast the shipworms question again? About salinity in water, right? Was that an assumption or weaken question?

yea does anyone remember those options
im pretty sure the answer wasnt about salinity in other oceans
i remember it being difficult but being positive about my answer. LR is my section.
Too bad I though LG was my section too until today

[existenz]

This is from the Wikipedia entry on Shipwrecks:

Salinity of water

Shipwrecks typically decay rapidly when in seawater; shipwrecks in some freshwater lakes, such as the Great Lakes of North America, have remained intact with little degradation. There are two reasons for this:

* Iron-based metals corrode much more quickly in seawater because of the dissolved salt present; the sodium and chloride ions chemically accelerate the process of metal oxidation which, in the case of ferrous metals, leads to rust.
* Bacteria found in seawater cause the wood on ships to rot more quickly than in freshwater.

In some sea areas, most notably in Gulf of Bothnia and Gulf of Finland, salinity is very low, and centuries-old wrecks have been preserved in reasonable condition.

I'm just hoping the LSAC version of reality doesn't have to conform to our reality.

[RCG37]

I feel shipwrecked after today...pun clearly intended. especially since that question came at the very end of the entire exam.

Anyhow, I had LR-LG-LR-RC-LR, all three LR's had 25 questions
it really chaps my as* when the LR is the experimental because now there's no way of knowing which was the experimental..

[baneofmyexistence]

LG-LR-LG-LR-RC
The First Section of Games was the real deal. The Hikers/Process Server/Zulla and Taylor/and i think the other game was about professors

The Second Games Section was a breeze, but unfortunately wasn't the Experimental.

you state this as if it were a fact. why?

[existenz]

LG-LR-LG-LR-RC
The First Section of Games was the real deal. The Hikers/Process Server/Zulla and Taylor/and i think the other game was about professors

The Second Games Section was a breeze, but unfortunately wasn't the Experimental.

you state this as if it were a fact. why?

Because the people with only one LG had Hikers. Therefore it is the real one.

[lokkier8]

did anyone get the "bridges" question in their LR? Is it the real LR or the experimental?

[idkmybffjill]

did anyone get the "bridges" question in their LR? Is it the real LR or the experimental?

I had only 2 LR and one had the bridges question...it was in the first 5 and def threw me off my 1-10 rhythm!

[tomwatts]

did anyone get the "bridges" question in their LR? Is it the real LR or the experimental?

About their length? Yeah, that was real. And it was a party in itself.

[algid1113]

let's just say... i hate edith wharton!!!

[RCG37]

what about babbling babies in LR?

[tomwatts]

what about babbling babies in LR?

That one I don't remember. Might be experimental.

[idkmybffjill]

what about babbling babies in LR?

That one I don't remember. Might be experimental.

There was one question early on in one of the LR's about babies having keen hearing etc but losing it after the first yr etc.?

[uganik]

.

[tomwatts]

what about babbling babies in LR?

That one I don't remember. Might be experimental.

There was one question early on in one of the LR's about babies having keen hearing etc but losing it after the first yr etc.?

Oh yeah! That was real.

[robin600]

ours was cancelled...so how were the lg? im curious if we will get the same test on the retake

You won't.

they would make a whole new test even on a nondisclosed? it will be nex saturday, well so says the lsac rep i talked to..they must have extra tests or somethng

They have multiple tests to begin with (i.e. foreign tests, Sabbath tests, etc.). LSAC was likely prepared. For all we know, they could also give us a previous undisclosed test that was any of the following as well. We definitely will not get the same test that was given today.

IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.

[Xizenta]

.

[keg411]

IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.

Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

[robin600]

I, as a previous 168er, 170+ practice tester respectfully disagree with that answer. Although I did have to read it a few times and I obviously could be quite wrong. (the mineral used to cook answer)

[s0ph1e2007]

What would happen if i posted an answer on here.
..
Does it matter?

[robin600]

IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.

Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

Yeah, that was June though and it was disclosed. I took the test today at 10am (instead of 830), and it was all the same questions as well. (hehehe, I know which section exactly is experimental!!! cuz I didn't have to take it!!! I'm sorry that was cruel).

[Xizenta]

.

[keg411]

IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.

Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

Yeah, that was June though and it was disclosed. I took the test today at 10am (instead of 830), and it was all the same questions as well. (hehehe, I know which section exactly is experimental!!! cuz I didn't have to take it!!! I'm sorry that was cruel).

Oh well, I guess I'll find out when they do the make up tests .
BTW, hope you did well enough to get off of some of those crazy WL's!

[robin600]

.

[robin600]

IDK about this because I take an accomodated test, and my questions are the exact same as everyone else's (at least it was during June). I took it a week later than everyone as well.

Really? That's interesting. I always thought they had a bunch of different tests.

Yeah, that was June though and it was disclosed. I took the test today at 10am (instead of 830), and it was all the same questions as well. (hehehe, I know which section exactly is experimental!!! cuz I didn't have to take it!!! I'm sorry that was cruel).

Oh well, I guess I'll find out when they do the make up tests .
BTW, hope you did well enough to get off of some of those crazy WL's!

Umm me 2! me 2! I will probably score the exact same as before, because that's how life is friends, uggh

[bakemono]

I thought the LG was very tough, probably even harder than the December 2009 LG which was the toughest in years. It looks like LSAC has found a way to write LG questions that can't be easily solved by wrote.

With that said, I think I got all of the LG right but there was a ton of room for error.

3 basic linears and a grouping is suddenly hard now?

And honestly, i thought 59 was one of the easiest LSAT's in recent history. My friend agrees too. We're kicking ourselves that we didn't take it, cause we would've both scored in the mid 170's with that ridiculous curve.