The Official June 2014 Study Group Forum
- dardardelight
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:17 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
Hahah I'd say so, jaylawyer. You have a lot more leverage with that high gpa. I'd say as long as you break 170, you'll be okay (assuming that you didn't go to a terrible undergrad college and have solid recs/Personal statement)
For me, I'd need at least a 172 and an ED application. Hopefully, I'll see you in morningside : ) we have a long way to go, however, and June is coming : /
For me, I'd need at least a 172 and an ED application. Hopefully, I'll see you in morningside : ) we have a long way to go, however, and June is coming : /
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:18 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group

LR1: -1
RC: -3
LG: -8 (wtfffff)
LR2: -1
I completely blanked on the third game. I skipped it, came back to it (with admittedly not really enough time to do it right anyway)... but still couldn't do it. Completely absolutely nothing. After staring at it for a minute or so, I panicked and filled in all C's, which panicked me more and... yup. Logic games, bane of my existence. I haven't even done anything BUT prep LG specifically (besides the two full tests) for weeks, and not only am I not improving, I seem to be getting worse! Back to 7Sage...
Related: anyone have an opinion on actually drilling the 7Sage way? Like instead of waiting several days in between repetition of games, repeat them over and over in one sitting? I feel like I'd just be memorizing particular games, but at this point I'm frustrated enough to try anything.
- alexrodriguez
- Posts: 841
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:59 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
PT 36 - I took this PT in the food court of my mall.
LR -14
RC -17
LR -6
LG -12 (Really embarrassing. Use it or lose it)
Comes to a 146
After Blind Review
LR -9
RC -5
LR -6
LG -0 (Haven't actually blind reviewed the games yet, but trust me. It's -0)
Comes to a 163
I'm going to take another 35 PT's up until test day. I think I'll be alright.
LR -14
RC -17
LR -6
LG -12 (Really embarrassing. Use it or lose it)
Comes to a 146
After Blind Review
LR -9
RC -5
LR -6
LG -0 (Haven't actually blind reviewed the games yet, but trust me. It's -0)
Comes to a 163
I'm going to take another 35 PT's up until test day. I think I'll be alright.
- alexrodriguez
- Posts: 841
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:59 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
I'm really going to give it my best shot, but I know I'm not scoring in the 170's.
If I hit anywhere between 160-165 I'll be good to go. Just being realistic.
If I hit anywhere between 160-165 I'll be good to go. Just being realistic.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 180kickflip
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
...dardardelight wrote:Hahah I'd say so, jaylawyer. You have a lot more leverage with that high gpa. I'd say as long as you break 170, you'll be okay (assuming that you didn't go to a terrible undergrad college and have solid recs/Personal statement)
For me, I'd need at least a 172 and an ED application. Hopefully, I'll see you in morningside : ) we have a long way to go, however, and June is coming : /
Last edited by 180kickflip on Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- dd235
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:33 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
Ya PT C is one of the harder ones... you are definitely not alone!
I just got back from my spring break. Gettin back into the thick of things starting tomorrow. I am planning on taking a PT tomorrow and blind reviewing it on Tuesday, and then reading the Manhattan LR book starting wednesday (its the only major LR book I haven’t read yet and I’ve heard pretty good things about it).
How long do you guys think it will take me to get through Manhattan LR? I plan on spending about 5 or 6 hours a day reading it and drilling.
I just got back from my spring break. Gettin back into the thick of things starting tomorrow. I am planning on taking a PT tomorrow and blind reviewing it on Tuesday, and then reading the Manhattan LR book starting wednesday (its the only major LR book I haven’t read yet and I’ve heard pretty good things about it).
How long do you guys think it will take me to get through Manhattan LR? I plan on spending about 5 or 6 hours a day reading it and drilling.
- myoung7189
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:51 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
superpep A
EXP (PT 41) RC -0
LR1 -2
RC -2
LG -6 (bangs head against table repeatedly)
LR2 -2
168
Trying to stay positive and that's is tough for a cynic like me. So, I'm grateful for the RC scores because it is by far my worst section. Don't feel too bad bleakchimera2 about the third game because it pillaged me as well.
EXP (PT 41) RC -0
LR1 -2
RC -2
LG -6 (bangs head against table repeatedly)
LR2 -2
168
Trying to stay positive and that's is tough for a cynic like me. So, I'm grateful for the RC scores because it is by far my worst section. Don't feel too bad bleakchimera2 about the third game because it pillaged me as well.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:34 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
.
Last edited by avocatchat on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- WaltGrace83
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:55 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
It's not speed, it's process. You should only run out of time if you are using the "plug and chug" method on more than a few questions per section. I'd recommend you analyze your process by going through 7sage videos. It's all about making those inferences and connecting the dots. Don't work faster; work smarter. This goes for the whole LSAT to be honest.avocatchat wrote:What's the best way to improve speed on LG?
I got -1 with ease on my diagnostic so I wasn't too worried about this section, but I've taken two PTs since then and gotten -9 and -11 solely due to running out of time!![]()
It seems weird that when I had no idea what I was getting into, I completed it faster than I can now, when I know what to expect... am I overthinking?
I know it's probably just a matter of practicing more, but are there any particular study methods that are better for improving speed? Drill individual problem sets or whole sections, or separate by game type, or something else?
- santoki
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:19 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
one small tip that i've found helps is that when you are actually going through the questions and you create some hypotheticals, make sure that you mark which ones are valid and which ones are not so that as you go forward you know which ones you can use and which ones not.avocatchat wrote:What's the best way to improve speed on LG?
I got -1 with ease on my diagnostic so I wasn't too worried about this section, but I've taken two PTs since then and gotten -9 and -11 solely due to running out of time!![]()
It seems weird that when I had no idea what I was getting into, I completed it faster than I can now, when I know what to expect... am I overthinking?
I know it's probably just a matter of practicing more, but are there any particular study methods that are better for improving speed? Drill individual problem sets or whole sections, or separate by game type, or something else?
its minor but it can save considerable time!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:10 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
This, to the 180th power. Well said.WaltGrace83 wrote:
It's not speed, it's process. You should only run out of time if you are using the "plug and chug" method on more than a few questions per section. I'd recommend you analyze your process by going through 7sage videos. It's all about making those inferences and connecting the dots. Don't work faster; work smarter. This goes for the whole LSAT to be honest.
- santoki
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:19 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
i know this is the wrong forum, but people ITT seem to be more chill than those in other boards. just a quick question- when will we know what the new GPA/LSAT medians/percentiles are for the new rankings?
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
They were released in September. Class of 2017 data.santoki wrote:i know this is the wrong forum, but people ITT seem to be more chill than those in other boards. just a quick question- when will we know what the new GPA/LSAT medians/percentiles are for the new rankings?
- santoki
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:19 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
after a ton of searching, im guessing (hoping) you mean the c/o 2016 data released in august?rebexness wrote:They were released in September. Class of 2017 data.santoki wrote:i know this is the wrong forum, but people ITT seem to be more chill than those in other boards. just a quick question- when will we know what the new GPA/LSAT medians/percentiles are for the new rankings?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... XZnc#gid=0
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- dardardelight
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:17 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
I just took the same exact PT and scored pretty much the same . That 4th circular LG game was killer for me too . I usually get like -6 on RC, but I scored -3 on this one, so I'm with you there. Do you think the RC section for this PT was abnormally easy ? I'd like to think we're just getting bettermyoung7189 wrote:superpep A
EXP (PT 41) RC -0
LR1 -2
RC -2
LG -6 (bangs head against table repeatedly)
LR2 -2
168
Trying to stay positive and that's is tough for a cynic like me. So, I'm grateful for the RC scores because it is by far my worst section. Don't feel too bad bleakchimera2 about the third game because it pillaged me as well.

-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:34 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
.
Last edited by avocatchat on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- givemea180
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:01 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
So if I don't get at least a 170 in June I'm retaking. Posting g here for the extra accountability. Anyone else have a hard number cutoff for a retake?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 180kickflip
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
...jaylawyer09 wrote:same, 170 for me.givemea180 wrote:So if I don't get at least a 170 in June I'm retaking. Posting g here for the extra accountability. Anyone else have a hard number cutoff for a retake?
Last edited by 180kickflip on Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- givemea180
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:01 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
Freedom from this test hanging over my head is enough motivation for me to keep grinding away towards that score.jaylawyer09 wrote:same, 170 for me.givemea180 wrote:So if I don't get at least a 170 in June I'm retaking. Posting g here for the extra accountability. Anyone else have a hard number cutoff for a retake?
Also talked to a friend today who got a 173 on the real deal after his highest pt was a 167. Obviously not TCR but just a little extra hope for everyone who needs those few points.
- givemea180
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:01 am
Re: The Official June 2014 Study Group
It will be really hard to put the effort into retaking if I'm only a few points short180kickflip wrote:Same. But I'll def. be happy with anything 167+jaylawyer09 wrote:same, 170 for me.givemea180 wrote:So if I don't get at least a 170 in June I'm retaking. Posting g here for the extra accountability. Anyone else have a hard number cutoff for a retake?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login