When I get a question wrong and look at the explanations for the right answer / wrong answer, all I really get in my head is a "oh, I see." In other words, the feeling I get after reading the explanation is mostly "i should have paid more attention to <insert particular word here>" or "ah, i didn't see that hole which really is a weak point.." etc etc. For LG, I get a sense of what rule / relationship I didn't really understand and, thus, can actively work to remember / memorize / understand said rule (e.g. conditionals). when i do a new game, i feel the improvement (or lack thereof).
LR, in contrast, just makes me feel stupid when i get it incorrect-- why did I get the wrong answer? careless (i.e. didn't fully appreciate the meanings of all the words). or didn't fully understand the argument (e.g. didn't see the hole for an argument with a weaken question). or thought something meant x when it meant y.. how do you correct that? i feel like the only way to fix it is to constantly do new problems but it seems like new problems simply leads to new misunderstandings.. i hope that made sense. my brain is a little fried right now.
anyways, my question is this: how do you review for a LR problem you got wrong? i feel like there is something about LR review that I am not getting
.
