Yay!!! Good work. Pretty balanced breakdown, so maybe just keep PTing? Drill some LR? Either way, looks like you're in good shape heading into the final push for Dec!CR2012 wrote:Hey all, last night I did PT 41, and got a 171!
LR1 -3
LG -2
LR2 -2
RC -3
This is my first time ever breaking 170, so I am extremely happy. I really love this feeling and hope I can use this as motivation.
December 2012 Re-takers Forum
- HawkeyeGirl

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
-
CR2012

- Posts: 238
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:27 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
HawkeyeGirl wrote:Yay!!! Good work. Pretty balanced breakdown, so maybe just keep PTing? Drill some LR? Either way, looks like you're in good shape heading into the final push for Dec!CR2012 wrote:Hey all, last night I did PT 41, and got a 171!
LR1 -3
LG -2
LR2 -2
RC -3
This is my first time ever breaking 170, so I am extremely happy. I really love this feeling and hope I can use this as motivation.
Just entered my PT into LSATQA, turns out I was a little hasty in my correcting, I went -3 in every section for a 170. Still, I am very happy to see some improvement. I am going to take PT 67 on Saturday. I also have Superprep C that I haven't taken, and I think PT 42 and 43 are largely untouched.
I am going to mix drilling sections and PTing. I think people on here are right that, even though I have seen problems before, the most important thing is understanding the mechanics and patterns of correct answers.
Thanks for the encouragement!
- Sugar Lumps

- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I took dance for seven years.Lenahan3 wrote:If somebody taught me to dance, I would. Pride is a luxury.AKsnow wrote:Start stripping.Lenahan3 wrote:I want to buy a book but I have no money. Hellllppppp.
You will be my grasshopper.
- Lenahan3

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Sugar Lumps wrote:I took dance for seven years.Lenahan3 wrote:If somebody taught me to dance, I would. Pride is a luxury.AKsnow wrote:Start stripping.Lenahan3 wrote:I want to buy a book but I have no money. Hellllppppp.
You will be my grasshopper.
Teacher.
- annet

- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
0-3 after work, currently more 0 than 3Lenahan3 wrote:How many hours are you peeps averaging a day?
- bitsy

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:06 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
congrats man, thats really inspiring. nice hustle.CR2012 wrote:Hey all, last night I did PT 41, and got a 171!
LR1 -3
LG -3
LR2 -3
RC -3
This is my first time ever breaking 170, so I am extremely happy. I really love this feeling and hope I can use this as motivation.
- Lenahan3

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
This is either really good news because it means that it was an outlier and we can expect better or terrible news because it could possibly signify a new LSAT trend.Wormfather wrote:PT67
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oct Today
RC -4 -5
LR -7 -6
LG -11 -11
Scld 162 162
This just confirms to me that this test was an outlier. Had I scored a 170 then I could have assumed that maybe it was conditions, score inflation or something else. PT 67 was a perfect LG/LR storm for my skill set. I got to zones too late (5 minutes left) If I had time I would have gotten them all right. I also somehow mixed up a rule on the first game as well fucking it over.
Furthermore, with regards to LR/RC out of the 11 I got wrong, 6 of them are ones I got wrong in Oct as well.
Either way, I think I'm gambling on the first. I'm retaking this test Saturday morning so we'll see if my results match up with yours!
- Cobretti

- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Sounds like those 6 repeats are a good opportunity to identity specific problem types to review at least. Consistency in your wrong answers can make for very productive studying.Wormfather wrote:PT67
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oct Today
RC -4 -5
LR -7 -6
LG -11 -11
Scld 162 162
This just confirms to me that this test was an outlier. Had I scored a 170 then I could have assumed that maybe it was conditions, score inflation or something else. PT 67 was a perfect LG/LR storm for my skill set. I got to zones too late (5 minutes left) If I had time I would have gotten them all right. I also somehow mixed up a rule on the first game as well fucking it over.
Furthermore, with regards to LR/RC out of the 11 I got wrong, 6 of them are ones I got wrong in Oct as well.
- Lenahan3

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
If we got unlucky in October, that means we'll get lucky in December, right? That sounds logical.Wormfather wrote:I thought about that but I went -11 on LR/RC combined and -11 on LG alone. it seems that I should go back to drilling games, specifically the types of the first one and the last one...just in case this is a trend.mrizza wrote:Sounds like those 6 repeats are a good opportunity to identity specific problem types to review at least. Consistency in your wrong answers can make for very productive studying.Wormfather wrote:PT67
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oct Today
RC -4 -5
LR -7 -6
LG -11 -11
Scld 162 162
This just confirms to me that this test was an outlier. Had I scored a 170 then I could have assumed that maybe it was conditions, score inflation or something else. PT 67 was a perfect LG/LR storm for my skill set. I got to zones too late (5 minutes left) If I had time I would have gotten them all right. I also somehow mixed up a rule on the first game as well fucking it over.
Furthermore, with regards to LR/RC out of the 11 I got wrong, 6 of them are ones I got wrong in Oct as well.
If I had went -14 in October, It would be an under performance, but I wouldnt be retaking.
- boblawlob

- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Just took PT June 2007 (not fresh, but it's been quite while?)
163
-16
LG: -0
RC (experimental PT 42..I sort of remembered the passages): -3
LR: -5
LR: -3
RC: -8
Brutal curve; Didn't help that I bombed RC. I think it has to do partially with timing but I just need to drill RC more and pick out the common wrong answer trends.
Back to the RC and LR grind.
163
-16
LG: -0
RC (experimental PT 42..I sort of remembered the passages): -3
LR: -5
LR: -3
RC: -8
Brutal curve; Didn't help that I bombed RC. I think it has to do partially with timing but I just need to drill RC more and pick out the common wrong answer trends.
Back to the RC and LR grind.
- BitterSplitter

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Fri Jun 14, 2013 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cobretti

- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
We are going over a bunch of RC passages from the Cambridge bundle on Sunday at 11AM PST. Click back a few pages for details.BitterSplitter wrote:Hey when are you all going to do that group test/review on tinychat? I'd like to join if that's cool. Please let me know which test(s) and which day. Thanks!
- GabeQuixote

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
haaaaaaaalp*Lenahan3 wrote:I want to buy a book but I have no money. Hellllppppp.
- GabeQuixote

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Well I work 9 hours per day, add in an hour front and back for commute.Lenahan3 wrote:How many hours are you peeps averaging a day?
So trying to do 3 hours per day when not testing. 5 hours when testing/including test.
Anymore would be *brainmelt*
- Lenahan3

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I just spent the last few hours counting and rolling change to make it through November. Sweet.
- Cobretti

- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Rolling can't help your studies, shit puts holes in your brainLenahan3 wrote:I just spent the last few hours counting and rolling change to make it through November. Sweet.
- Sugar Lumps

- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Go sell plasma like a real poor.Lenahan3 wrote:I just spent the last few hours counting and rolling change to make it through November. Sweet.
- PickledPanda

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
/shudderSugar Lumps wrote: Go sell plasma like a real poor.
- Lenahan3

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
My semen is worth more.Sugar Lumps wrote:Go sell plasma like a real poor.Lenahan3 wrote:I just spent the last few hours counting and rolling change to make it through November. Sweet.
- Cobretti

- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I laugh at your phobias so much I'm starting to worry I have sadistic tendenciesPickledPanda wrote:/shudderSugar Lumps wrote: Go sell plasma like a real poor.
- PickledPanda

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:43 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
It's okay. My brother-in-law's mom is a nurse. She laughs too. One time she brought me a lancet from work to show me how they lock in place after a single use. Too bad they don't have those for needles yet. Or, do they?mrizza wrote:I laugh at your phobias so much I'm starting to worry I have sadistic tendenciesPickledPanda wrote:/shudderSugar Lumps wrote: Go sell plasma like a real poor.
- GabeQuixote

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I wish I had the free time to roll coins.
- Cobretti

- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Lol you need a break Gabe, that's the saddest thing I've ever readGabeQuixote wrote:I wish I had the free time to roll coins.
- Lenahan3

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I was a click away from posting this sentiment. Breakdownnn.mrizza wrote:Lol you need a break Gabe, that's the saddest thing I've ever readGabeQuixote wrote:I wish I had the free time to roll coins.