The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
My trickiest section was LG. I'm good at RC, and okay at LR.
Assuming I didn't miss too many on the LG (and, uh, I'm thinking I might have missed 5+) things should be okay. I just wanted a 160+.
Assuming I didn't miss too many on the LG (and, uh, I'm thinking I might have missed 5+) things should be okay. I just wanted a 160+.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Does anyone remember a 1-1 tiered ordering game? There were eight things, and they were broken up into two tiers of four. F had to be in tier 1, and H had to be in Tier 2.
-
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:26 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
According to LSAC the score email date is March 3. Do they usually stick to that?
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I don't think that was the real section. The only one that I remember that had the H was the last game with GPOM as well but it wasn't tiered.Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone remember a 1-1 tiered ordering game? There were eight things, and they were broken up into two tiers of four. F had to be in tier 1, and H had to be in Tier 2.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
For the life of me I can't remember any subjects from my first LR. Someone mentioned a bunch that sounded familiar but they might've been in my 2nd of 3 LRs....
Last edited by AbbeyS on Sat Feb 06, 2016 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Was the GPOMH game the sofa game? w/ the 1-2-3 distribution? Also was 2nd in the section?marlui wrote:I don't think that was the real section. The only one that I remember that had the H was the last game with GPOM as well but it wasn't tiered.Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone remember a 1-1 tiered ordering game? There were eight things, and they were broken up into two tiers of four. F had to be in tier 1, and H had to be in Tier 2.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Was the GPOM a normal ordering game? Do you remember any of the rules?marlui wrote:I don't think that was the real section. The only one that I remember that had the H was the last game with GPOM as well but it wasn't tiered.Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone remember a 1-1 tiered ordering game? There were eight things, and they were broken up into two tiers of four. F had to be in tier 1, and H had to be in Tier 2.
mod edit: DO NOT ASK ABOUT/REVEAL THE KIND OF GAME OR THE RULES.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:48 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
X
Last edited by jlet0314 on Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Real.jlet0314 wrote:Was the question about the food not being hunted by some other people real?
- Shib26
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:03 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Yes, they're almost always early actually. I think they've only been late once and that was due to a blizzard.Alive97 wrote:According to LSAC the score email date is March 3. Do they usually stick to that?
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
mod edit: TOO MUCH INFORMATION. DO NOT DISCUSS THE KIND OF GAME OR RULES INVOLVED OR ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ANSWER/HOW YOU REACHED THE ANSWER
- tedofsandimas
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:32 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I had experimental LG and real LG back to back, and I think I did really well on the real section. I don't remember anything from LR, at all.
And I think I bombed RC
I struggled a lot more than I usually do and had to do the last four questions in like two minutes.
All in all I think my score will be lower than October
And this was my last take, unfortunately.
And I think I bombed RC

All in all I think my score will be lower than October

- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
True. I looked it up & someone compiled all the past tests. February almost always comes 3 days early but it has come right on time before (and also 1 day late once like she said)Shib26 wrote:Yes, they're almost always early actually. I think they've only been late once and that was due to a blizzard.Alive97 wrote:According to LSAC the score email date is March 3. Do they usually stick to that?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
mod edit: TOO MUCH INFORMATION. DO NOT DISCUSS THE KIND OF GAME OR RULES INVOLVED OR ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ANSWER/HOW YOU REACHED THE ANSWER
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Can we talk about LR lol...I'm still lost in a cloud of confusion/depression
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:40 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I am in the exact same boat. I took Oct too and had two LG. This test felt harder than October to me, personally...tedofsandimas wrote:I had experimental LG and real LG back to back, and I think I did really well on the real section. I don't remember anything from LR, at all.
And I think I bombed RCI struggled a lot more than I usually do and had to do the last four questions in like two minutes.
All in all I think my score will be lower than OctoberAnd this was my last take, unfortunately.
Was LG section 1 and 2 for you?? I'm getting the games all mixed up, but I felt better during the test about section 1 and from what I can piece together that section was real. I remember soo much detail from all the other sections but I think because they were back to back I'm having trouble figuring out which games were in which section.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Since you can remember sooo much detail about the other sections, would you mind helping a sister out with piecing together the 2 LR sections?hottytoddy1 wrote:I am in the exact same boat. I took Oct too and had two LG. This test felt harder than October to me, personally...tedofsandimas wrote:I had experimental LG and real LG back to back, and I think I did really well on the real section. I don't remember anything from LR, at all.
And I think I bombed RCI struggled a lot more than I usually do and had to do the last four questions in like two minutes.
All in all I think my score will be lower than OctoberAnd this was my last take, unfortunately.
Was LG section 1 and 2 for you?? I'm getting the games all mixed up, but I felt better during the test about section 1 and from what I can piece together that section was real. I remember soo much detail from all the other sections but I think because they were back to back I'm having trouble figuring out which games were in which section.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:48 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
edit
Real.[/quote]
Real.[/quote]
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:48 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
X
Last edited by jlet0314 on Sat Feb 06, 2016 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mudiverse
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:31 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Can anyone confirm if the LR section with the brain section on Broca and bilinguals was real or experimental? Really stressing out about that as I assumed it was experimental. There were some very oddly worded question stems that.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Broca was real. I only had two LR, that was in one of themmudiverse wrote:Can anyone confirm if the LR section with the brain section on Broca and bilinguals was real or experimental? Really stressing out about that as I assumed it was experimental. There were some very oddly worded question stems that.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:40 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Of course. Any particular questions stick out in your mind? Feel free to PM too.AbbeyS wrote:Since you can remember sooo much detail about the other sections, would you mind helping a sister out with piecing together the 2 LR sections?hottytoddy1 wrote:I am in the exact same boat. I took Oct too and had two LG. This test felt harder than October to me, personally...tedofsandimas wrote:I had experimental LG and real LG back to back, and I think I did really well on the real section. I don't remember anything from LR, at all.
And I think I bombed RCI struggled a lot more than I usually do and had to do the last four questions in like two minutes.
All in all I think my score will be lower than OctoberAnd this was my last take, unfortunately.
Was LG section 1 and 2 for you?? I'm getting the games all mixed up, but I felt better during the test about section 1 and from what I can piece together that section was real. I remember soo much detail from all the other sections but I think because they were back to back I'm having trouble figuring out which games were in which section.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
tedofsandimas wrote:I had experimental LG and real LG back to back, and I think I did really well on the real section. I don't remember anything from LR, at all.
And I think I bombed RCI struggled a lot more than I usually do and had to do the last four questions in like two minutes.
All in all I think my score will be lower than OctoberAnd this was my last take, unfortunately.
I had them back to back at first too! Can you tell if the first or second section was the real one? I can't remember which game was in which section, but I remember not feeling as good about the first.
-
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:12 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Just to quickly jump in on the score release question, yes, scores typically are released earlier than the stated date: http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/bid/153 ... -2004-2016AbbeyS wrote:True. I looked it up & someone compiled all the past tests. February almost always comes 3 days early but it has come right on time before (and also 1 day late once like she said)Shib26 wrote:Yes, they're almost always early actually. I think they've only been late once and that was due to a blizzard.Alive97 wrote:According to LSAC the score email date is March 3. Do they usually stick to that?
Currently, we're thinking around March 1st for the release date on this one, but certainly Monday, Feb 29 is a real possibility too.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
mod edit: TOO MUCH INFORMATION. DO NOT DISCUSS THE KIND OF GAME OR RULES INVOLVED OR ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ANSWER/HOW YOU REACHED THE ANSWER
Last edited by Morcartwright on Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login