OCT 2011 Experimental Section Forum
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
@EMZE that first LR had many parallel reasoning as well right?
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
@mike2's,
I really can't remember. I can place it in all three with the same (lack of) certainty.
The first one was much harder than the other two though, no? I am curious if anyone with only 2 LRs found two sections with very disparate difficulty levels, or 2 even
I really can't remember. I can place it in all three with the same (lack of) certainty.
The first one was much harder than the other two though, no? I am curious if anyone with only 2 LRs found two sections with very disparate difficulty levels, or 2 even
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 4:45 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
supposedly this was not experimental.bt53 wrote:The one with the chiropractor and healing back pain was definitely on my 3rd lr (4th section overall)
Do you remember if this was the same section as "global warming effects on animals in arctic/tropic and oxygen consumption"
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:21 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Dude my 2nd lr had a huge amount of parallel reasoning, like 10 in a row right? My breakdown was 25 26 26. I remember thinking that I had never seen so many parallel reasoning questions in one section beforemike22222 wrote:@EMZE that first LR had many parallel reasoning as well right?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:21 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
senorhosh wrote:supposedly this was not experimental.bt53 wrote:The one with the chiropractor and healing back pain was definitely on my 3rd lr (4th section overall)
Do you remember if this was the same section as "global warming effects on animals in arctic/tropic and oxygen consumption"
I don't actually but I do remember a question about turbines and ocean currents affecting warm/cold in europe or something
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- qbt1990
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
THIS. It was INSANE and ate up so much of my timebt53 wrote:Dude my 2nd lr had a huge amount of parallel reasoning, like 10 in a row right? My breakdown was 25 26 26. I remember thinking that I had never seen so many parallel reasoning questions in one section beforemike22222 wrote:@EMZE that first LR had many parallel reasoning as well right?
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
I go back and forth so many times on whcih question placed where that it makes me ill. I am fairly certain that my first LR was experimental, as that would leave me with 100 questions if not, and that is not consistent with other who all have 101. I just remember when I saw my forth LR thinking that I was glad it had the same number of questions as the first LR, so hopefully they are interchangeable
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
PLEASE !
For ppl who had LG/RC experimental, did you have a question that involved democracy requiring fair and free elections/robust news media?
???
For ppl who had LG/RC experimental, did you have a question that involved democracy requiring fair and free elections/robust news media?
???
- srrrrh
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:28 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
...
Last edited by srrrrh on Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
honestly I think i f'd up on the first LR but did at least well on the following 2. I thought initially i just did bad on the first LR cuz it was the first one but it was harder according to others as well
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Ok thanks srrrrh. That confirms it. Shit. I was hoping that my 4th section/3rd LR was experimental. But No. It is real. Shit. Damn.
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Yes, but if that first one, as we both hope, was experimental, than all is well in my world.
- 941law
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
first LR section was experimental for those with LR-LG-LR-LR-RC


Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
yeah hope the first Lr was exp. is there any way ppl who had 3 LR s had them in different order? Does LSAC do that?
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:48 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Yeah i had this too and i was also hoping the first section was exp. Who knows...carpenter. wrote:I had the same, but was hoping the first was experimental. The third I actually felt good about! C'est la vie!FAJISTE wrote:Dude, I had a logic games 1st section then LR then another Logic games on the 3rd section. I GOT RAPED by the 3rd section one. Overall I think I did very well on the rest of the test but that 3rd section. Soon found out it was experimental. WIN
I knew it was experimental while taking it; it was nothing like the last 10 games at all.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
@ 941law hope so, but what makes you so sure? lol
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
There were two DIFFERENT LR Experimentals.
If you had the section with Dogs/Apes/Flowers, that is your experimental-section 4/3rd LR
If you had the section with Dogs/Apes/Flowers, that is your experimental-section 4/3rd LR
Last edited by itsaclassic on Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- qbt1990
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
I personally think so. A lot of people are saying how hard their first LR section was - I found it ridiculously easy, and the 3rd one extremely hard. I think the LSAC is definitely capable of doing this to throw us off.mike22222 wrote:yeah hope the first Lr was exp. is there any way ppl who had 3 LR s had them in different order? Does LSAC do that?
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
@itsaclassic i had one about monkey feeding their babies beacuse of fear of agression from other monkeys. but apprently one section had monkeys looking in the mirror?
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
qbt1990 wrote:I personally think so. A lot of people are saying how hard their first LR section was - I found it ridiculously easy, and the 3rd one extremely hard. I think the LSAC is definitely capable of doing this to throw us off.mike22222 wrote:yeah hope the first Lr was exp. is there any way ppl who had 3 LR s had them in different order? Does LSAC do that?
was the one you found hard full of parallel reasoning?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:40 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
@mike
I don't remember either of those monkey/ape questions and I had 3 LRs. Ugh. This is so confusing.
I don't remember either of those monkey/ape questions and I had 3 LRs. Ugh. This is so confusing.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kingjones59
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:28 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
qbt1990 wrote:rivermaker wrote:why do i see fkin people creating new accounts to say that the experimental was the 4th section. Saw 3 people so far. Either there are fuckin trolls coming in to freak people out OR for the first time in lsat history the 4th section was the experimental. im leaning towards the latter, but if you are trying to make people feel like shit you have succeeded.
No seriously don't be rude, I am not trying to freak ANYBODY out I swear on my family I have talked to 3 people now and I am confident my 4th section was experimental!! I'm freaking out too, I wanted it to be the third one and I am in shock/disbelief right now
PS I'm a nice person I'm not trying to make anyone feel like shit hahaha, trust me I am not happy with this either
Some guy created like 3 accounts to try and tell everyone the experimental was the fourth. It is not the fourth. It would make no sense for lsac to put everyone elses before the break, and EVERY TEST UNTIL TODAY before the break, and us lucky ones who had 3 LR got the experimental after the break. Funny how nobody on here can barely remember what they had for breakfast before the test, but you guys are "100% confident that the 4th is experimental". Also, look at the quote above. He changed the guy he quoted to say "im leaning toward the latter", when you if you scroll up and look at his original post he said "im leaning toward the former". Get out of here a**hole, cooley law leaving you with a bunch of time on your hands?
Last edited by kingjones59 on Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:21 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
@mike22222 was your first section with all the parallel reasoning questions the one that also contained the long principle question abut computers?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:41 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Zambia one was the real logic games section.
- 941law
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
because section 1 had the ape question that only 33% of the board seemed to have.mike22222 wrote:@ 941law hope so, but what makes you so sure? lol
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login