RC LR LR LG LR Forum

[JDHopeful]

I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??

[Gemini]

I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??

Hello fellow Hopeful!

Your 1st LR was the experimental.

[Sandro]

I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??

Hello fellow Hopeful!

Your 1st LR was the experimental.

I hope so. 1st LR was definitely harder than any of the 3 IMO

[lolol10]

I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??

Hello fellow Hopeful!

Your 1st LR was the experimental.

I hope so. 1st LR was definitely harder than any of the 3 IMO

+1 i blacked-out the experience. horrible way to start the exam. everything else felt A LOT easier after that though

[Gemini]

I had

RC (27) LR (26) LR (25) LG (23) LR (26)

Which one was experimental?

I had the exact same distribution as you.

The current theory is that the second section, no matter what it is, is the experimental section.

[lsatnyc83]

i had RC LR (25) LR (25) LG LR (26)

any chance the third section was experimental? has anyone confirmed this possibility?

[Sandro]

I had the same. I hope it was the first LR that was experimental.

[bartleby]

For those who had two 25Q LR before break, I thought we all agreed the 2nd one was much harder? Bah, I don't even remember now but one LR was easy as shit and I heard that one was the experimental.

[JDHopeful]

Yea, but isnt it tru that they may have flipped them?

[minnbills]

Yea, but isnt it tru that they may have flipped them?

It's definitely possible that there were multilple experimentals deployed on the RC LR LR LG LR format.

At this point, I don't think were going to know 'til the scores come out.

[Sandro]

For those who had two 25Q LR before break, I thought we all agreed the 2nd one was much harder? Bah, I don't even remember now but one LR was easy as shit and I heard that one was the experimental.

I thought the first one was experimental. To be honest i cant exactly remember how many questions I had on each LR but Im pretty sure my first LR was 25. Second LR was much easier than first.

[DrackedaryMaster]

The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.

[Sandro]

The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.

I had 3 LR and dont for the life of me remember Kafka. I also thought LR1 was hardest so it seems there are multiple arrangements of LR.

[Perch]

FML. Nailed the second section (first LR) which apparently means nada.

Me too. Experimental was a joke.

definitely felt better about section 2 than section 3 or 5

[Lasers]

did anyone else have this exact order:

1: RC-27
2: LR-25
3: LR-26
4: LG-23
5: LR-26

???

[lolol10]

yeah but i had the two RC before break flipped. 26 25

[Lasers]

yeah but i had the two RC before break flipped. 26 25

almost everyone i have seen had what you had.

i'm wondering if anyone else had it 25 then 26 like i did or am i just misremembering...!?

[alphagamma]

The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.

I had 3 LR and dont for the life of me remember Kafka. I also thought LR1 was hardest so it seems there are multiple arrangements of LR.

Yeah, there were multiple experimental LR sections. Mine didn't have Kafka, either. I believe it had a question about spider venom.

[Perch]

The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.

I had 3 LR and dont for the life of me remember Kafka. I also thought LR1 was hardest so it seems there are multiple arrangements of LR.

Yeah, there were multiple experimental LR sections. Mine didn't have Kafka, either. I believe it had a question about spider venom.

did the spider venom have to do with some other animal? i can't remember kafka or venom really