The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:12 pm

I think both Games 3 and 4 were five.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:14 pm

Post removed...

pterodactyls · Post by **pterodactyls** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:15 pm

Yeah it was five. I made specific note of it because I knew I bombed it.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:19 pm

Post removed...

osgiliath · Post by **osgiliath** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:19 pm

pterodactyls wrote:Yeah it was five. I made specific note of it because I knew I bombed it.

Shoooot I thought it was 6

ffamran · Post by **ffamran** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:23 pm

osgiliath wrote:
pterodactyls wrote:Yeah it was five. I made specific note of it because I knew I bombed it.

Shoooot I thought it was 6

Isn't it better if it's actually 5? Less to potentially miss.

(Unless you think you aced it and are hoping you got one more point from that game)

pterodactyls · Post by **pterodactyls** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:24 pm

ffamran wrote:
osgiliath wrote:
pterodactyls wrote:Yeah it was five. I made specific note of it because I knew I bombed it.

Shoooot I thought it was 6
Isn't it better if it's actually 5? Less to potentially miss.

(Unless you think you aced it and are hoping you got one more point from that game)

Yeah that's what I was thinking.

First question was a gimme so I ended up guessing on 4 in that game.

Danimals18 · Post by **Danimals18** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:28 pm

more posting, keep me entertained at work please and thank you
to uh, be part of the solution....the kardasians are awful

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:34 pm

Post removed.

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:35 pm

Post removed.

McJimJam · Post by **McJimJam** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:38 pm

Post removed.

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:04 pm

Have fun shitpoasting all. On a short trip.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:12 pm

Post removed.

LurkSoHard · Post by **LurkSoHard** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:15 pm

Post removed...

LurkSoHard · Post by **LurkSoHard** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:15 pm

Post removed...

pterodactyls · Post by **pterodactyls** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:31 pm

LurkSoHard wrote:Can someone please inform me why it's against LSAC rules to discuss questions? Is it just so we don't discuss specific experimental questions? If so, that makes sense to me. But I still don't quite understand why we are not allowed to discuss specific questions that re not experimental, as everyone has already taken the lsat, and the ones that haven't aren't going to benefit from our discussion because they will not be taking the same test that we took.

Well for one, there are Saturday Sabbath observers taking the LSAT on Wednesday (though I think it may be a slightly different test?).

Two, people who decide to cancel are supposed to do it based on their own feelings regarding the test. If we discussed the right and wrong answer for every question, I guess it would give them greater insight as to whether or not to cancel.

Three, if tests are running at different times (one test center starts at 8:30 promptly, another is running 2 hours behind), a test taker could (in theory) look up some answers on a cell phone before the test is over.

Four, I think it opens up a can of worms with the experimental thing. If you say "you can discuss any questions that weren't experimental" then people discuss the experimental anyways, and they say "oops - I didn't think that was the experimental section!" or "oops - I got my LR questions mixed up!"

These are just my guesses.

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:32 pm

Post removed.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:33 pm

Post removed.

ftge232 · Post by **ftge232** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:33 pm

LurkSoHard wrote:Can someone please inform me why it's against LSAC rules to discuss questions? Is it just so we don't discuss specific experimental questions? If so, that makes sense to me. But I still don't quite understand why we are not allowed to discuss specific questions that re not experimental, as everyone has already taken the lsat, and the ones that haven't aren't going to benefit from our discussion because they will not be taking the same test that we took.

I see the issue with experimentals - though couldn't this confer an advantage to retakers who have seen the experimentals before?

I imagine that discussion in the days following the test is an issue because of Sabbath observers taking the test after Saturday

Not sure tbh, all i could come up with

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:34 pm

Post removed.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:36 pm

Post removed.

Mint-Berry_Crunch · Post by **Mint-Berry_Crunch** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:37 pm

Post removed...

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:37 pm

Post removed.

PJam1989 · Post by **PJam1989** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:38 pm

Deleted Post

3pianists · Post by **3pianists** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:53 pm

theugg wrote:I'll just make an Unofficial October Waiter's Oasis with next level polls.

Please do this!!