I'm going with the Powerscore prediction of it actually being Thursday.Mikey wrote:ehh, I feel like it may be tomorrow instead of today but I will still refresh like crazy come around 3pmAnon-e-miss wrote:How confident are y'all that today will be grey day?
-11 Curve, September 2017 Waiter's Thread Forum
- mwells56
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:08 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:32 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
For those of you applying next cycle, when are you planning on retaking if your score is less than ideal? I thought December might be too close (since I haven't been studying) but then February is undisclosed...
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:09 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I dreamed I got an email that said 190, which was pretty rad, until I went to the website and found out I actually had a 154.jjdude14 wrote:Score dream last night: I checked and got a 171 (thank god) then it switched back to grey then green then I got a 173 (oh damn) then another grey green switch and I was at 146. Please help
- wmbuff
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:26 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I'd have to figure that out. At least for the long weekends.Ntp73821 wrote:Ahh, gotcha. That makes sense. How often would you be planning to fly? Sounds expensive.wmbuff wrote:
Long term, yes, it's a great city for her. But she's keeping her current job while I'm in school.
Last edited by wmbuff on Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Jumping on the dream bandwagon to say that I had my first LSAT dream this morning but I only got so far as seeing distinctly grey on the LSAC webpage. Snapped awake and was disappointed to find them still green to my bleary eyes.
Also wondering this. I think they're automatic in the following weeks but for the life of me I can't remember where I read that.CottonHarvest wrote:Do law schools go through and offer fee waivers in the week or two after scores come out or is it best to just email and ask for them?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
What is the most likely time of day that are grey hours, again?
I know around ~4ish
I know around ~4ish
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:53 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
4-6 EST are most commonRupert Pupkin wrote:What is the most likely time of day that are grey hours, again?
I know around ~4ish
Last edited by Ntp73821 on Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Thats what I thought..Thanks!Ntp73821 wrote:4-6 EST are most commonRupert Pupkin wrote:What is the most likely time of day that are grey hours, again?
I know around ~4ish
- DistrictDisaster
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2017 10:15 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Thanks for the kind words - I am sure the same will be true for you. As I said I'm really focused on $$ so frankly T6 isn't going to be a thing for me anyhow. I will probably apply to NYU and Chicago just for the torture but think I'm way way more likely to end up at Georgetown, Cornell, GWU, Vanderbilt, Northwestern...also thinking of applying to Duke and Minnesota. I may have just spent 10 minutes on myLSN looking at 165/3.95 splitters. Not hopeless! Just want the waiting to be over because seriously, nausea. Where are you looking at?iammrsiglesias wrote:Yeah, no one can really answer those questions for you. Something that has helped me though is keeping things in perspective based on my goals. Like I definitely would love to attend a T6, but for my goals its certainly not required. Being an overachiever, its easy to get wrapped up in prestige and this pressure to meet your own (often unreasonable) standards. Obviously if you think you can score higher, go for a retake. Just don't think that a 168/3.95 is a bad place to be in--others would kill for those stats and you'll be in a good position either way.DistrictDisaster wrote:I'm really frustrated by it too. I've taken the GRE twice and always done well (though only just ok on math b/c am slow) - I never expected this to kick my butt so much. The highest I've *ever* gotten on a PT was 174, and it only happened once. So I guess I'm a bit unsure - if I got say a 168, is it really worth retaking - under exam pressure conditions, is this more or less the best I'm capable of? Or is there something in my prep that I'm missing and I too could be one of these mythical high-170s people?? I don't know the answer.iammrsiglesias wrote:Yeah, I'm hoping adcomms will share your point of view! I'm definitely in the same spot as you though with the lsat. It's really the one thing holding me back..I feel like when you have a high GPA it makes it even harder to just settle for a score since you know there's really no ceiling on where you could attend.DistrictDisaster wrote:My opinion doesn't mean much, but if I were an admissions officer and saw you'd taken the lsat 4 times and worked steadily to improve your score, I would never think poorly of you - the opposite if anything.
I'm also a splitter where lsat is going to seriously determine my list. My gpa is 3.95 and I have graduate degrees and 5+ years in legal research....but the lsat is killing me. I'm old which means I really need to find the sweet spot of going to a good school that will give me max chance to wind up in my desired job type, but also that will give me good funding (since I will have a shorter career to pay off loans). Some of the schools I initially wanted to target won't be feasible bc of lsat. Bah!
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I kinda don't really want to see the -28 (-27?) I'm about to get on RC tho..
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
???? did the RC have 28 questions?Mikey wrote:I kinda don't really want to see the -28 (-27?) I'm about to get on RC tho..
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:49 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
No, 27!chewinggum wrote:???? did the RC have 28 questions?Mikey wrote:I kinda don't really want to see the -28 (-27?) I'm about to get on RC tho..
- creed
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
this is where we're at rn isnt itCottonHarvest wrote:No, 27!chewinggum wrote:???? did the RC have 28 questions?Mikey wrote:I kinda don't really want to see the -28 (-27?) I'm about to get on RC tho..
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:57 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
No problem! Reverse splitters gotta stick togetherDistrictDisaster wrote:Thanks for the kind words - I am sure the same will be true for you. As I said I'm really focused on $$ so frankly T6 isn't going to be a thing for me anyhow. I will probably apply to NYU and Chicago just for the torture but think I'm way way more likely to end up at Georgetown, Cornell, GWU, Vanderbilt, Northwestern...also thinking of applying to Duke and Minnesota. I may have just spent 10 minutes on myLSN looking at 165/3.95 splitters. Not hopeless! Just want the waiting to be over because seriously, nausea. Where are you looking at?iammrsiglesias wrote:Yeah, no one can really answer those questions for you. Something that has helped me though is keeping things in perspective based on my goals. Like I definitely would love to attend a T6, but for my goals its certainly not required. Being an overachiever, its easy to get wrapped up in prestige and this pressure to meet your own (often unreasonable) standards. Obviously if you think you can score higher, go for a retake. Just don't think that a 168/3.95 is a bad place to be in--others would kill for those stats and you'll be in a good position either way.DistrictDisaster wrote:I'm really frustrated by it too. I've taken the GRE twice and always done well (though only just ok on math b/c am slow) - I never expected this to kick my butt so much. The highest I've *ever* gotten on a PT was 174, and it only happened once. So I guess I'm a bit unsure - if I got say a 168, is it really worth retaking - under exam pressure conditions, is this more or less the best I'm capable of? Or is there something in my prep that I'm missing and I too could be one of these mythical high-170s people?? I don't know the answer.iammrsiglesias wrote:Yeah, I'm hoping adcomms will share your point of view! I'm definitely in the same spot as you though with the lsat. It's really the one thing holding me back..I feel like when you have a high GPA it makes it even harder to just settle for a score since you know there's really no ceiling on where you could attend.DistrictDisaster wrote:My opinion doesn't mean much, but if I were an admissions officer and saw you'd taken the lsat 4 times and worked steadily to improve your score, I would never think poorly of you - the opposite if anything.
I'm also a splitter where lsat is going to seriously determine my list. My gpa is 3.95 and I have graduate degrees and 5+ years in legal research....but the lsat is killing me. I'm old which means I really need to find the sweet spot of going to a good school that will give me max chance to wind up in my desired job type, but also that will give me good funding (since I will have a shorter career to pay off loans). Some of the schools I initially wanted to target won't be feasible bc of lsat. Bah!

But honestly I'm having a lot of trouble deciding where to apply. Depends a lot on the LSAT. Currently, I'm pretty into Vandy and Wash U, but would love to crack the T14.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I didn't remember but I know it had to have been either 27 or 28 lol but I'm sure I got each one wrongchewinggum wrote:???? did the RC have 28 questions?Mikey wrote:I kinda don't really want to see the -28 (-27?) I'm about to get on RC tho..
- kgm1990
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2015 3:29 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I don't think you can reverse-psychology the LSAT. You sound like a smart person, I'm sure you did way better than that. Besides, at this point, que sera, sera.Mikey wrote:I didn't remember but I know it had to have been either 27 or 28 lol but I'm sure I got each one wrongchewinggum wrote:???? did the RC have 28 questions?Mikey wrote:I kinda don't really want to see the -28 (-27?) I'm about to get on RC tho..
-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I feel like ass today
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
No chanceAnon-e-miss wrote:How confident are y'all that today will be grey day?
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
If I'm 5 points above their median, and ask them not to wait, I can't see why they would.spicysalmonroll wrote:what's the policy on apps that are submitted, then updated with newer scores? Wouldn't the schools see that you've registered for December and just defer your application for January review anyway?saf18hornet wrote:I'm taking december no matter what.spicysalmonroll wrote:retakers: what's the game plan if your sept score turns out to be lower? sign up for december? just fuck it and apply?
If my score is still <170, i'll send in my apps to all my safety schools (GWU, Vandy, Gtown, etc.)
If my score is 170+, I'll apply now and add a better score in January to help with scholarships / WL's
- abujabal
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I'm feeling likesaf18hornet wrote:No chanceAnon-e-miss wrote:How confident are y'all that today will be grey day?
Today: 10% chance
Wednesday: 40% chance
Thursday: 50% chance
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
saf18hornet wrote:No chanceAnon-e-miss wrote:How confident are y'all that today will be grey day?
If it came out on Thursday, I'm pretty sure that would be the only time that scores didn't come out at least 1 day in advance aside from the Hurricane Sandy delayabujabal wrote:I'm feeling likesaf18hornet wrote:No chanceAnon-e-miss wrote:How confident are y'all that today will be grey day?
Today: 10% chance
Wednesday: 40% chance
Thursday: 50% chance
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
are the scores out yet?
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I'd put today's chances at higher than 10%, 1-2 days early is the norm lately.
- ilpsm
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:14 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
yeah i think today has good chances but probably not better than tomorrow's odds. a lot of exams (SAT, AP) are scored in new jersey which may be why sandy posed extraordinary "delays", but not sure about where the LSAT is scored.
Last edited by ilpsm on Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I agree. I have a feeling today is very likelyJack_Kelly wrote:I'd put today's chances at higher than 10%, 1-2 days early is the norm lately.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login