DEALsomethingElse wrote:I can promise no lower than a c minusMikey wrote:as long as you can get me a 135 I'll be happysomethingElse wrote:haha you would NOT want that trust meMikey wrote:can you take the December test for me? <3somethingElse wrote:what would Vinny Chase do?
The Official December 2017 Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
i agree with mr pumpkin
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
I MEAN PIPKIN
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
he'd just wing itsomethingElse wrote:what would Vinny Chase do?
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
somethingElse wrote:i agree with mr pumpkin

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Shit sorry. Just 1 passage not the whole thing & I did well overall despite feeling that way if that makes you feel better!!Mikey wrote:no but I plan too, and now you just scared mekiklavan wrote:Ugh have you guys taken PT 76? The RC just rocked my world (and not in a good way).
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
it's all good!kiklavan wrote:Shit sorry. Just 1 passage not the whole thing & I did well overall despite feeling that way if that makes you feel better!!Mikey wrote:no but I plan too, and now you just scared mekiklavan wrote:Ugh have you guys taken PT 76? The RC just rocked my world (and not in a good way).
just realized I wrote 'too' instead of 'to' lmaooooo smh
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
“Fuck it boys, if the whole law thing doesn’t work out we can always go back to Queen’s!”somethingElse wrote:what would Vinny Chase do?
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
SMOKES, LETS GO!
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
YES!PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:“Fuck it boys, if the whole law thing doesn’t work out we can always go back to Queen’s!”somethingElse wrote:what would Vinny Chase do?
"I dont wanna go back to Queens bro!" -Johnny Drama
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
sloan was so chill
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
total bro. Prob the best gf on the showsomethingElse wrote:sloan was so chill
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
either her or sasha grey for suresRupert Pupkin wrote:total bro. Prob the best gf on the showsomethingElse wrote:sloan was so chill
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
“Baby bro! You’ve been doing logic games since Medeillen!”Rupert Pupkin wrote:YES!PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:“Fuck it boys, if the whole law thing doesn’t work out we can always go back to Queen’s!”somethingElse wrote:what would Vinny Chase do?
"I dont wanna go back to Queens bro!" -Johnny Drama
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Oo Sasha grey was cool toosomethingElse wrote:either her or sasha grey for suresRupert Pupkin wrote:total bro. Prob the best gf on the showsomethingElse wrote:sloan was so chill
Haha love itPhiladelphiaCollins wrote:“Baby bro! You’ve been doing logic games since Medeillen!”Rupert Pupkin wrote:YES!PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:“Fuck it boys, if the whole law thing doesn’t work out we can always go back to Queen’s!”somethingElse wrote:what would Vinny Chase do?
"I dont wanna go back to Queens bro!" -Johnny Drama
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Okay so...
I took a practice test on Saturday night and somehow got a 176, which is WAY higher than my average score of 169. I have been working pretty hard on RC and only missed 1 question on this particular test. IS THIS A FLUKE?!?!
I took a practice test on Saturday night and somehow got a 176, which is WAY higher than my average score of 169. I have been working pretty hard on RC and only missed 1 question on this particular test. IS THIS A FLUKE?!?!
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:33 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
PT 36, 180 -2 on RC. 100% because I've seen like 75% of the LR questions in prep books or drilling packets. Whatever, still a win in my book.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- MercW07
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Don't look at it as a fluke, look at it as your hard work paying off. Take another PT, score well on RC again, and confirm that it was in fact not a flukepeege wrote:Okay so...
I took a practice test on Saturday night and somehow got a 176, which is WAY higher than my average score of 169. I have been working pretty hard on RC and only missed 1 question on this particular test. IS THIS A FLUKE?!?!
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Most of the time I can pull out my top score on 2/4 of the sections but mess up the other two, and for some reason on this test they all went as well as possible, so I'm trying to figure out how to harness that energy for the actual thing.MercW07 wrote:Don't look at it as a fluke, look at it as your hard work paying off. Take another PT, score well on RC again, and confirm that it was in fact not a flukepeege wrote:Okay so...
I took a practice test on Saturday night and somehow got a 176, which is WAY higher than my average score of 169. I have been working pretty hard on RC and only missed 1 question on this particular test. IS THIS A FLUKE?!?!
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Thats just an evolution of your testing stamina. Instead of being drained or not 100% focused on two you were able to capitalize on this in all sections. In my experience, as you have done more PTs this comes more into fruition. Just keep PTing and youll increase your consistency.peege wrote:Most of the time I can pull out my top score on 2/4 of the sections but mess up the other two, and for some reason on this test they all went as well as possible, so I'm trying to figure out how to harness that energy for the actual thing.MercW07 wrote:Don't look at it as a fluke, look at it as your hard work paying off. Take another PT, score well on RC again, and confirm that it was in fact not a flukepeege wrote:Okay so...
I took a practice test on Saturday night and somehow got a 176, which is WAY higher than my average score of 169. I have been working pretty hard on RC and only missed 1 question on this particular test. IS THIS A FLUKE?!?!
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:33 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Have you guys done PT 48 Game 1? I feel like Henri needs to move because that electric situation is out of control.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by barcafan202 on Sun Nov 19, 2017 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Pt Feb 1997
LR -5 (BR -4)
RC -2 (BR -2)
EXP LR -1
LR -1 (-0)
LG -3 (-0)
-11 / -6
--------------------------
173 (BR 177)
Holy moly - there was a difficult pattern game, had time to figure it out. It wasn't inherently hard but to work it out required more time than I had. Also is there anyone else that thinks some of the older LR stimuli make absolutely no sense when you read them? I had a few cases were I genuinely had no idea WTF they were even trying to get across. Happy about RC tho!
LR -5 (BR -4)
RC -2 (BR -2)
EXP LR -1
LR -1 (-0)
LG -3 (-0)
-11 / -6
--------------------------
173 (BR 177)
Holy moly - there was a difficult pattern game, had time to figure it out. It wasn't inherently hard but to work it out required more time than I had. Also is there anyone else that thinks some of the older LR stimuli make absolutely no sense when you read them? I had a few cases were I genuinely had no idea WTF they were even trying to get across. Happy about RC tho!

-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
I'm going to quit being lazy and drill.
What 3LR sections and 2RC sections from 1-72 do you guys say I should do :p?
What 3LR sections and 2RC sections from 1-72 do you guys say I should do :p?
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Study Group
Guys I'm taking C2 tomorrow (don't tell me anything about it) and can I just say that if my score is a 166 again and the last 3 months of studying post-Sep. have done nothing for me..... I might die 

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login