June 2014 Retakers Forum
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
What is the lowest score y'all will take without retaking. It his is my final take, but i would say 173. Anything lower than that and I would retake (if I could)
- dasani13

- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Drilling Principle and Paradox questions today because I got a total of 3 of each wrong in the last 2 PTs I took. Any suggestions on these?
- foamborn

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:29 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
175 is the lowest I would take, and that's actually debatable. My feeling right now is that I'd retake sub-176, but I imagine in the event that I actually got a 175 I wouldn't feel enough pressure to study adequately for a later test.jk148706 wrote:What is the lowest score y'all will take without retaking. It his is my final take, but i would say 173. Anything lower than that and I would retake (if I could)
Took another PT today and got a 178, but I'm making stupid mistakes. I'm missing/mis-reading silly LR questions. I have to think this is a result of losing my confidence after my last performance on a PT. I catch myself second-guessing where I wouldn't before. Does anyone have any recommendations for regaining that confidence?
- dd235

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:33 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
This is my third take so obviously I’ll take whatever I can get. Would be thrilled with a 170+ though
-
rebexness

- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
dd235 wrote:This is mythird(>3) take so obviously I’ll take whatever I can get. Would be thrilled with a 170+ though
-
charlesriver

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:38 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
I would say 173. But I am not close to the goal yet. seriously considering postpone. I heard somewhere if I call the night before to cancel, that won't count as one take?jk148706 wrote:What is the lowest score y'all will take without retaking. It his is my final take, but i would say 173. Anything lower than that and I would retake (if I could)
-
rebexness

- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
UGH.
Definitely did not take this PT seriously and it showed. Probably gave me the kick in the ass i need before test day. (strongly considering self ban tbqh)
PT 64
LR 1: -6
LG: -2
LR 2: -4
RC: -7 (WTF WTF WTF)
Raw: 82
Score: 166.
Definitely did not take this PT seriously and it showed. Probably gave me the kick in the ass i need before test day. (strongly considering self ban tbqh)
PT 64
LR 1: -6
LG: -2
LR 2: -4
RC: -7 (WTF WTF WTF)
Raw: 82
Score: 166.
- dd235

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:33 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Taking 64 tomorrow... you have me scared.rebexness wrote:UGH.
Definitely did not take this PT seriously and it showed. Probably gave me the kick in the ass i need before test day. (strongly considering self ban tbqh)
PT 64
LR 1: -6
LG: -2
LR 2: -4
RC: -7 (WTF WTF WTF)
Raw: 82
Score: 166.
-
rebexness

- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Don't be. I got most of them right when I reviewed. Just being sloppy.
RC esp final two passages was bad news bears.
RC esp final two passages was bad news bears.
- dd235

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:33 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
I guess we’ll see tomorrow.rebexness wrote:Don't be. I got most of them right when I reviewed. Just being sloppy.
RC esp final two passages was bad news bears.
Speaking of blind reviewing, it is the absolute worst feeling when I miss extra questions during BR. Happened to me on PT 70
- BaberhamLincoln

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
I asked this on the other June thread but it may be more relevant to you retakers:
Looking over my chart of PT scores and individual section scores. Also averaging my tests this year versus last.
I know the answer to this question is probably the answer to most questions ("It depends") but what do you guys consider a reasonable point-increase from one LSAT to the next?
Obviously, we have JK in this thread who improved a whole 10 points -- but I don't think that's typical.
I scored 161 last year. I am reaaaaaaaaaaally hoping to get 167+. Hoping for, like, 175 would be silly.
Looking over my chart of PT scores and individual section scores. Also averaging my tests this year versus last.
I know the answer to this question is probably the answer to most questions ("It depends") but what do you guys consider a reasonable point-increase from one LSAT to the next?
Obviously, we have JK in this thread who improved a whole 10 points -- but I don't think that's typical.
I scored 161 last year. I am reaaaaaaaaaaally hoping to get 167+. Hoping for, like, 175 would be silly.
-
rebexness

- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
"It depends".leigh912198972 wrote:
I know the answer to this question is probably the answer to most questions ("It depends") but what do you guys consider a reasonable point-increase from one LSAT to the next?
.
How much prep, how much time in between, etc etc etc.
- dasani13

- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
I'm not sure what you're asking. Do you mean what is a reasonable increase to expect? That would depend on a lot of things. But if you're capable of a 161 you are definitely capable of a 167+. Just stay positive and keep studying!leigh912198972 wrote: what do you guys consider a reasonable point-increase from one LSAT to the next?
- BaberhamLincoln

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Yep that's what I was asking. And thank you for that confidencedasani13 wrote:I'm not sure what you're asking. Do you mean what is a reasonable increase to expect? That would depend on a lot of things. But if you're capable of a 161 you are definitely capable of a 167+. Just stay positive and keep studying!leigh912198972 wrote: what do you guys consider a reasonable point-increase from one LSAT to the next?
- dasani13

- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
I was working on level 4 Principle (ID) questions from the Cambridge packets this morning. Not gonna lie, at least like 2 questions brought me back to that feeling I used to get in 8th grade ESOL English class where I'd read a few sentences and afterwards have no idea how any of them were related. (PT 30, S2, Q19 for example)
-
Learn_Live_Hope

- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:33 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
...
Last edited by Learn_Live_Hope on Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dasani13

- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
It's not a reoccurring thing, it just happened to this particular question lol. How's studying going with you?Learn_Live_Hope wrote:Awwww so sorry to hear thatdasani13 wrote:I was working on level 4 Principle (ID) questions from the Cambridge packets this morning. Not gonna lie, at least like 2 questions brought me back to that feeling I used to get in 8th grade ESOL English class where I'd read a few sentences and afterwards have no idea how any of them were related. (PT 30, S2, Q19 for example)![]()
Do you have this type of issue with both principle type questions, or just the Id one?
-
Learn_Live_Hope

- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:33 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
...
Last edited by Learn_Live_Hope on Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dd235

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:33 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Just had one of the best LSAT days I've had in a while!!!
Took PT 64 with 2 experimental sections from PT 65 (I usually take 4-section PTs and wanted to ensure that I had the stamina for test day)
LR1: -1
LG: -0
LR2: -0
RC:-3
EXP LR: -0
EXP LG: -0
Raw 97
Scales 178
RC felt really hard to me so I am shocked that I only missed three questions. I also wasn't able to finish the RC section and spent an extra 8 minutes on it and didn't count it against me in my score so it would have probably been closer to low 170s if strictly timed. At this point, I am definitely going to concentrate my few remaining drilling days on RC, mostly ignoring LR but still sprinkling in at least one LG a day so I don't slow down.
I took yesterday off and it felt great! I can't stress enough how much we all need a break in order to rejuvenate our minds.
Took PT 64 with 2 experimental sections from PT 65 (I usually take 4-section PTs and wanted to ensure that I had the stamina for test day)
LR1: -1
LG: -0
LR2: -0
RC:-3
EXP LR: -0
EXP LG: -0
Raw 97
Scales 178
RC felt really hard to me so I am shocked that I only missed three questions. I also wasn't able to finish the RC section and spent an extra 8 minutes on it and didn't count it against me in my score so it would have probably been closer to low 170s if strictly timed. At this point, I am definitely going to concentrate my few remaining drilling days on RC, mostly ignoring LR but still sprinkling in at least one LG a day so I don't slow down.
I took yesterday off and it felt great! I can't stress enough how much we all need a break in order to rejuvenate our minds.
-
rebexness

- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
dd235 wrote:Just had one of the best LSAT days I've had in a while!!!
Took PT 64 with 2 experimental sections from PT 65 (I usually take 4-section PTs and wanted to ensure that I had the stamina for test day)
LR1: -1
LG: -0
LR2: -0
RC:-3
EXP LR: -0
EXP LG: -0
Raw 97
Scales 178
RC felt really hard to me so I am shocked that I only missed three questions. I also wasn't able to finish the RC section and spent an extra 8 minutes on it and didn't count it against me in my score so it would have probably been closer to low 170s if strictly timed. At this point, I am definitely going to concentrate my few remaining drilling days on RC, mostly ignoring LR but still sprinkling in at least one LG a day so I don't slow down.
So really you missed an entire passage of RC, at least.
- dd235

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:33 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Ya probably drops my score down about 6-8 points
-
rebexness

- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Twentydaystwentydaystwentydays.
- dasani13

- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
Is it too late to be drilling? Should we be just PTing and reviewing from now on?
-
Learn_Live_Hope

- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:33 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
...
Last edited by Learn_Live_Hope on Tue Oct 21, 2014 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dasani13

- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: June 2014 Retakers
butLearn_Live_Hope wrote:Im still drilling…i take PT-review etc, and then drill.dasani13 wrote:Is it too late to be drilling? Should we be just PTing and reviewing from now on?if i have time why not...
rebexness wrote:Twentydaystwentydaystwentydays.