not sure which was the experimental, but felt really good about my section 4, which i believe is Real

LG- detectives, photographers, cookbooks, etc
RC- last passage was about Uranus
fips tedora wrote:Just came back from a relaxing weekend of sex, brews, and food. Poll is added.
lawmuchacha wrote:LR ( had experimental) - i remember a question about Planet 253, Microdiamonds, Trade between Mexico the Us. and Canada, pizza baking in ovens, lavendar scents, Ostriches, then last question of one of my sections was about animals/reptiles Hissing sounds...
not sure which was the experimental, but felt really good about my section 4, which i believe is Real![]()
LG- detectives, photographers, cookbooks, etc
RC- last passage was about Uranus
Who better than you to pick a new one?theugg wrote:Thread is too on topic. Someone pick any other subject.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
yep saw it last summer. magneto is bad assSirArthurDayne wrote:Did you watch X- Men Days of Future Past? It's pretty good. And this is not a superhero movie but my favorite movie this year has got to be Interstellar. Great movie!flash21 wrote:can someone recommend me good super hero movies? I've seen a lot of them but just watched avengers 3 last night and thought it was great.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'll try to find some free time tomorrow or wed to address this in more detail, swimming in calls right now. But, if nothing is going to change you may as well apply now. There have been some counter cycles where applying later was beneficial (when admissions offices were going on past data and guessed wrong on current cycle data) but this cycle may be just the opposite, ie the past year's data was down and this year applicants will be up. If that is true you should apply now before they get the DEC LSAC LSAT bandwidth data.Talarose wrote:I almost died when I got my June score because I thought I needed to submit by the beginning of October in order to have to best chance. And I still think that's true if you've got amazing stats, because it will get you that $$$.
But after reading this:
http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/how-th ... -and-next/
More specifically, this:
and thisNumerous law schools have been in an under-enrolled holding pattern, waiting to see how the WL looks to be shaping up and how strong their medians are. The strategy is to maintain medians at the expense (pun and all) of tuition revenue brought on by class size.
I'm starting to think that applying later is better. Not too late, but late November? December? Even after December LSAT? Mugabe I'm reading all of this wrong, but if you apply early and don't have THE strongest stats, doesn't it seem like you're more likely to get rejected because schools are trying to keep their numbers up and waiting for better applicants? So if you apply later when they've already rejected a lot of people and are holding out for higher stats, you'll have a better chance? Idn, just trying to think about something other than Saturday's test and this came up. What do you guys think? Any further insights Spivey?What a 10% increase in first-time June test-takers introduces to this equation is a bit of assurance to deans that they can play this “wait and hold on to numbers over enrollment” game longer into this cycle
live action pleaseMcJimJam wrote:live action, animated, or both?flash21 wrote:can someone recommend me good super hero movies? I've seen a lot of them but just watched avengers 3 last night and thought it was great.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Gabe is way hotter. I just don't like blondes.theugg wrote:Peeta is a cutie.RZ5646 wrote:Hunger Games movie sucks. It's basically shaky footage of JLaw running through the woods.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I do. For one there was a possible misreading of the rules on game 3. A mistake I made then corrected as the questions wasnt making sense. Heard others make the same mistake, and there were likely more that didnt notice. Not allowed to say exact nature of mistake, but it was easy to make and involved similar rules.theugg wrote:I don't think most people messed up Game 3 anyways... Don't think it'll much affect the curve.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login