The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Mon Jun 15, 2015 8:13 pm

Post removed.

bpolley0 · Post by **bpolley0** » Mon Jun 15, 2015 8:13 pm

jj2hawks · Post by **jj2hawks** » Mon Jun 15, 2015 8:50 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
I remember nothing,
Only LSAT
Disappointed in you guys for not getting this GoT reference smdh

I got ya !

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:59 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
I remember nothing,
Only LSAT
Disappointed in you guys for not getting this GoT reference smdh

Disappointed in us ITT generally. This time last year the June '14 waiters was up to 66 pages

Need to step up our shitpoasting, gang!

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:31 am

Post removed.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:39 am

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:52 am

Post removed.

jumbocolumbo · Post by **jumbocolumbo** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:02 am

basedvulpes wrote:Fuck I just dreamt that they released scores early and it seemed so real. I was awake thinking about my 173 for 10 minutes before I realized what happened.

Its the itch that can't be scratched. I used to think I was a patient person.

tedofsandimas · Post by **tedofsandimas** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:03 am

There were at most 50 people at my testing site. Since it was my first take I had nothing to compare it to, but it seemed low.

togoornottogo · Post by **togoornottogo** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:08 am

The testing center I was in was pretty large. Two rooms with roughly 50 person per room. However, the proctor said they expected 75 per room. So every single person fewer is music to my ears. Harvard to 169.

Whnlifegvsulmns · Post by **Whnlifegvsulmns** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:19 am

I bet the waiting wouldn't be so bad if we wouldn't masturpost and hang around this thread so long. All it does it make you think about it more. Then again, I have nothing better to do either and I'm pretty sure I've read all of the other posts in the other sub-forums.

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:22 am

whacka wrote:
idk why but it seems like a lot fewer people took the test this June... we had a lot of October defectors who got cold feet and people who just fell off the face of the earth.

Feb. and June are typically the administrations with the lowest number of test takers. Will be interesting to see how June '15 compares with the last few years. Per LSAC's reports, in June '14, 21,803 sat for the test, which was a drop from the previous June '13 total of 23,997. As recently as 2010 there were 32,973 ppl sitting for the June administration.

though the test was equated before we even sat down to take it, so little of this matters

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:31 am

Post removed.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:32 am

Post removed.

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:36 am

Post removed.

jumbocolumbo · Post by **jumbocolumbo** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:38 am

WTF AM I SUPPOSED TO DO WITH ALL OF THESE ISSUES OF THE ECONOMIST!?

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:42 am

jumbocolumbo wrote:WTF AM I SUPPOSED TO DO WITH ALL OF THESE ISSUES OF THE ECONOMIST!?

1. Steal insignificant objects from office mates' desks
2. Use issues of the Economist to make ransom letters like in the movies
3. ????
4. Profit

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:51 am

Post removed.

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:58 am

Seamus887 wrote:
EnderWiggin wrote:
whacka wrote:
idk why but it seems like a lot fewer people took the test this June... we had a lot of October defectors who got cold feet and people who just fell off the face of the earth.
Feb. and June are typically the administrations with the lowest number of test takers. Will be interesting to see how June '15 compares with the last few years. Per LSAC's reports, in June '14, 21,803 sat for the test, which was a drop from the previous June '13 total of 23,997. As recently as 2010 there were 32,973 ppl sitting for the June administration.

though the test was equated before we even sat down to take it, so little of this matters
Well our curve wont matter but in the applications it will. The less people with high scores the more they want those of us that do. +170s are seeing the biggest drop whilst the 150s keep rolling in, which means +170s just get more and more rare and valuable to admissions.

smart people who follow these things closer than I do seem to believe that we may have hit bottom in the low numbers of 165+/170+/175+ scorers. not sure how one could be completely confident of this though. let's just hope the fighting-to-maintain-median wounds are fresh in the adcomm's minds early in the cycle and so they are wowed by our 180s and immediately admit us

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:59 am

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
jumbocolumbo wrote:WTF AM I SUPPOSED TO DO WITH ALL OF THESE ISSUES OF THE ECONOMIST!?
A modern 21st century educated gentleman reads the Economist for leisure, not for silly frivolity like the LSAT

tbh i hope i may never be called a modern 21st century educated gentleman

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:10 am

Post removed.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:17 am

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:20 am

Post removed.

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:21 am

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
Ya boi Spivey seems to be under the impression that they will at least level off, if not rise a bit

yea one of his posts on THESE FORA was the unsourced source there