vikingrunner wrote:So I had to be at work within an hour of finishing the test, so f*ck that.
VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTION:
When I get home, do I go for the Bombay Sapphire or the Wild Turkey American Honey first?
WE HAVE A WINNER.
vikingrunner wrote:So I had to be at work within an hour of finishing the test, so f*ck that.
VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTION:
When I get home, do I go for the Bombay Sapphire or the Wild Turkey American Honey first?
+1JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:Honestly, I don't care about my score (I mean, ok, maybe a little), but there were quite a number of LR questions I'd love to know the answers to right now. Knights, Poem Paraphrase, Atom Fusion Energy just to name a few
jagerbom, is it you? you are unrecognizable with the new name.Rupert Pupkin wrote:11 and 12 would be clutch!JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:I'm leaning 11 I think. 12 seems like a stretch.PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:Dave Killoran says -11 or -12 which would be huuuuge. It seems familiar to me and I had an LG exp, so I’m gonna say no.Skadidas wrote:This thread is too quiet haha. Any predictions for curve? -9? -10? Also, does anybody know if the LR question on software developers is experimental?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Pretty sure it is, I only had 2 LR and I don't recall any of them....Ceetee17 wrote:Anybody remember a question about duck hunting, hunting licenses, and conservation? I think this was experimental, but wanted to check.
That was a weird one. I believe the correct answer APPARENTLY INCLUDED A BAN.stuff
It is people saying the lr sections were trickier than usual that worrries me because I usually have the most trouble with lr and thought these were easy in comparison. I finished both lr sections wth time to spare and I usually end up having to speed through or guess on a few questions. Doesn’t really mean anything though. Time to wait.strawberryrhubarb wrote:LG wasn't bad. The simple sequencing game had a few not so simple rules IMO. Game 4 was rushed but I've seen worse.
Had two RCs, not bad - both of em.
LR was a bit trickier than usual? Most worried about this section.
Hoping for that 168
I'd say this is a good sign. don't obsess over it.KylawRen wrote:It is people saying the lr sections were trickier than usual that worrries me because I usually have the most trouble with lr and thought these were easy in comparison. I finished both lr sections wth time to spare and I usually end up having to speed through or guess on a few questions. Doesn’t really mean anything though. Time to wait.strawberryrhubarb wrote:LG wasn't bad. The simple sequencing game had a few not so simple rules IMO. Game 4 was rushed but I've seen worse.
Had two RCs, not bad - both of em.
LR was a bit trickier than usual? Most worried about this section.
Hoping for that 168
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Retake old material and take the test again! You made progress studying and your score can only go up if you add some more effort.littlewing67 wrote:Ugh I’m feeling really depressed right now. Almost certain I did horribly and did not reach my goal. Not going to cancel just in case. Sad that I wasted so many months studying for nothing. Not retaking because I have no new material. :/
Haha yes it is me. Sorry felt like switching it up a little while ago.appind wrote:jagerbom, is it you? you are unrecognizable with the new name.Rupert Pupkin wrote:11 and 12 would be clutch!JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:I'm leaning 11 I think. 12 seems like a stretch.PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:Dave Killoran says -11 or -12 which would be huuuuge. It seems familiar to me and I had an LG exp, so I’m gonna say no.Skadidas wrote:This thread is too quiet haha. Any predictions for curve? -9? -10? Also, does anybody know if the LR question on software developers is experimental?
how'd it go?
eating pretzels (cc: Pretzel) was key during the break btwsomethingElse wrote:CONGRATS on being done with the test guys!! Now comes the fun partThese threads are the best on TLS
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Well said. Definitely some weird LRs and I focused more on POE when i went back to approach questions I was uncertain of. Im hoping in my last LR i still had clarity and being a bit drained didn't cause me to overlook something in my evaluations but i FEEL like i was able to catch myself in these tough questionsS0L0 wrote:I can't remember specifically.JessiCAL wrote:What was the topic of the don't say what kind of question question? I had 3 LRs but don't remember that one.S0L0 wrote:Agree with this. Switched my LR strategy leading up to December to read the question stems first with a rigorous elimination process. This made the LR seem fairly easy. Definitely remember some weird questions (Caligula, fish, etc.) but was mostly able to uncover LSAC's tricks.lemonlacroix wrote:
LR wasn't difficult if you focused on why wrong answers are wrong - we're both convinced some of the "right" answers were just not wrong.
Definitely remember a don't say what kind of question question where all five conceivably could have strengthened but one took a lot of mental gymnastics.
On the other hand, I do remember a weird don't say what kind of question question about temp differences and diff heating bills.
I could also be thinking of the don't say what kind of question questions - I remember it being weird. Could also have been something else. Brain is mush right now.
DAMN RIGHT!Rupert Pupkin wrote:eating pretzels (cc: Pretzel) was key during the break btwsomethingElse wrote:CONGRATS on being done with the test guys!! Now comes the fun partThese threads are the best on TLS
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Yeah I definitely didn’t have any duck hunting questionsCeetee17 wrote:Anybody remember a question about duck hunting, hunting licenses, and conservation? I think this was experimental, but wanted to check.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login