How does the curve work? Wouldn't the bigger the curve be better?jleon25 wrote:Jumping in this discussion to help out. Using powerscore's website, -10 on 101 happened on June 2008 and -8 happened on 101 for December 2005. Other than those two instances, -10 on 101 has not happened since June 2005!! I'm hoping it is not -10 though. RC murdered me.RonnyDiniro wrote:Why do you say thatLi'l Sebastian wrote:There's no way a 101 Q test will have a -10 curve.
The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Omg same! I thought it was easy but everybody saying it was difficult made me think I messed up some sort of rule or something. As for me, I had two RC's. I thought the comparative reading ones on sprawls was tough. Those of you asking about the LR, the one with 26 questions had the moths I believe. The real one with 25 I found easier, I can't really remember any of the questions on that one.dhwz175 wrote:I thought the LG was ridiculously easy with nothing out of the ordinary but reading on here that some of you found the rules unique scares me a bit...I don't remember feeling that way at all (praying I didn't misread)
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Same.AbbeyS wrote:Eff that question. I was cluelessPoopNpants wrote:The only LR question that really gave me problems time-wise was the question about Psychology/reduction Q
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Do you know the order of the games? would be extremely appreciatedmarlui wrote:Omg same! I thought it was easy but everybody saying it was difficult made me think I messed up some sort of rule or something. As for me, I had two RC's. I thought the comparative reading ones on sprawls was tough. Those of you asking about the LR, the one with 26 questions had the moths I believe. The real one with 25 I found easier, I can't really remember any of the questions on that one.dhwz175 wrote:I thought the LG was ridiculously easy with nothing out of the ordinary but reading on here that some of you found the rules unique scares me a bit...I don't remember feeling that way at all (praying I didn't misread)
- Roundhill
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Cell phone deductable LR was real too
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:26 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Wish we did not have to wait until March 3 for scores lol.
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I misnotated the rule for one of the LG's (game 4 i believe) but realized it on the first question when i couldnt find a right answer. If you got through the games without noticing youre probably fine.marlui wrote:Omg same! I thought it was easy but everybody saying it was difficult made me think I messed up some sort of rule or something. As for me, I had two RC's. I thought the comparative reading ones on sprawls was tough. Those of you asking about the LR, the one with 26 questions had the moths I believe. The real one with 25 I found easier, I can't really remember any of the questions on that one.dhwz175 wrote:I thought the LG was ridiculously easy with nothing out of the ordinary but reading on here that some of you found the rules unique scares me a bit...I don't remember feeling that way at all (praying I didn't misread)
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas, lamps, tables
3. Artist names (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
Last edited by AbbeyS on Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:15 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
So which one is the real RC? The one with hedges?
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
The first real game was the one where L could be in 2/4 and K couldn't be before G. Second one was something with S and R, 3 different groups and if L wasn't in one it had to go with m. Third was the cities one I believe, with w not being able to go with t. The last one was the one with h m g o and all the s in 2 or P last rulerobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
Last edited by marlui on Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Artists names was 4th. Also did anyone else find RC easy, finished in surprisingly good time. Might have been the red bull.AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Sculpture, can't remember 2, hedges, sprawlBahamut79 wrote:So which one is the real RC? The one with hedges?
- Roundhill
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Yes and Workers/Employer representation passageBahamut79 wrote:So which one is the real RC? The one with hedges?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
Do you remember anything else about the sofas? Was it just simply a linear game with 5 spaces like: _ _ _ _ _??
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Norobz77 wrote:AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
Do you remember anything else about the sofas? Was it just simply a linear game with 5 spaces like: _ _ _ _ _??
Last edited by AbbeyS on Sat Feb 06, 2016 7:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Thanks be to the LSAT gods that the LG about horses wasn't real. Makes me feel somewhat more confident. :/
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Does anyone remember the questions from the LG that were experimental? I can't for the life of me remember which section I did first.AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Wait, could you remind me what the horses game was about?? Thanks a tonrundontwalk wrote:Thanks be to the LSAT gods that the LG about horses wasn't real. Makes me feel somewhat more confident. :/
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone remember the questions from the LG that were experimental? I can't for the life of me remember which section I did first.AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
That would be amazing. Concur. Trying to figure out which one was in which. People are saying something about the horses game?? Anyone know the details??
Last edited by robz77 on Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Shib26
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:03 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Alright, now that I've actually had time to think about it. LG and LR w/ 25 questions seemed very reasonable. Feel good about those and think I did well. The LR with 26 questions didn't seem that much harder it just took me a long time. I normally finish LR with about 5 minutes to spare and on that one I was rushed at the end at guessed at the last three. Probably missed at least 4 on that one. RC though was brutal. It's always my worst section and it seems like the consensus is that RC was tough so that means that I could have gone -8 or more easy.
That being said I feel like it was pretty typical overall. I'd agree with others who are predicting a -10/-11 curve.
That being said I feel like it was pretty typical overall. I'd agree with others who are predicting a -10/-11 curve.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
It was about racehorses at various race tracks. I ran out of time on that one and just guessed for everything.robz77 wrote:Wait, could you remind me what the horses game was about?? Thanks a tonrundontwalk wrote:Thanks be to the LSAT gods that the LG about horses wasn't real. Makes me feel somewhat more confident. :/
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Do you remember how many tracks there were?rundontwalk wrote:It was about racehorses at various race tracks. I ran out of time on that one and just guessed for everything.robz77 wrote:Wait, could you remind me what the horses game was about?? Thanks a tonrundontwalk wrote:Thanks be to the LSAT gods that the LG about horses wasn't real. Makes me feel somewhat more confident. :/
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:11 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
4, or 5.robz77 wrote:Do you remember how many tracks there were?rundontwalk wrote:It was about racehorses at various race tracks. I ran out of time on that one and just guessed for everything.robz77 wrote:Wait, could you remind me what the horses game was about?? Thanks a tonrundontwalk wrote:Thanks be to the LSAT gods that the LG about horses wasn't real. Makes me feel somewhat more confident. :/
One of the horses was named X iirc.
Last edited by rundontwalk on Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Shib26
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:03 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Is 1 the bookstore?AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:40 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I weirdly remember a lot of detail about the in/out game with five spaces in and either K/L out. You had to order the five in too and L could not go in space 5. Is this real?Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone remember the questions from the LG that were experimental? I can't for the life of me remember which section I did first.AbbeyS wrote:1. Honestly can't remember subject but only 5 Qsrobz77 wrote:do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
2. Sofas before R, lamps with M, etc 1,2, 3 groups
3. Artist names, no KG, no L 1-3-5 (this might've been 4th, can't remember)
4. London, Madrid, Paris
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login