Violation of LSAT test center regulations Forum

grizz20 · Post by **grizz20** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:26 pm

Nagster5 wrote:
Get with the times, OP was a troll and this thread is now about the ethics of being a dickhead to people for their own good.

Thanks for the update. Next time, I'll be sure to read the posts more clearly on my phone...(sarcasm)....

OLitch · Post by **OLitch** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:31 pm

Trollin' Trollin' Trollin'

Nagster5 · Post by **Nagster5** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:35 pm

Post removed.

grizz20 · Post by **grizz20** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:56 pm

Nagster5 wrote:
grizz20 wrote:
Nagster5 wrote:
When you do read the thread you'll realize that was more of a jab at myself than anything, please don't hate me.

Damn. You got me to read a lot of the thread. lolz.

Any more posts from users about ethics of being a dickhead on the web?

Nagster5 · Post by **Nagster5** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:28 pm

Post removed.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:42 pm

Post removed.

MistakenGenius · Post by **MistakenGenius** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 7:00 pm

Post removed.

splittermcsplit88 · Post by **splittermcsplit88** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 9:16 pm

Can only imagine how bad OP must feel right now. But even if someone wanted to be sympathetic/lenient towards OP...I think it'll be hard....I mean if you can't follow/aren't aware of even the most basic rules related to your desired profession...what can I say? What are you going to tell your client when you miss the deadline for submitting your brief to court by a few minutes and they refuse to accept it?

Phoenix97 · Post by **Phoenix97** » Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:08 pm

Post removed...

ak13 · Post by **ak13** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:01 pm

nlee10 wrote:
McJimJam wrote:Really enjoy~~ing~~ed this thread.

pancakes3 · Post by **pancakes3** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:56 pm

joeycxxxx09 wrote:
pancakes3 wrote:
joeycxxxx09 wrote:Not sure why some of you are being so ruthless, this could easily be an honest mistake. The fact he erased the answers after they told him you can't do that shows that he was trying to correct the error and return it to the way it was before he made the mistake. And let's be honest, if any of you ran out of time before bubbling the last two questions on a section you would bubble those in at some point before you turned the test in.
No bro, we wouldn't. I wouldn't, anyway.
You're telling me if you bubbled in 25 of 27 RC questions, time got called while you were bubbling, and you knew both of those answers were C, you wouldn't bubble in the last two questions at some point? You would leave the 2 points on the table for the rest of the test? Lol

If I knew the answers to the last 2 were C, why wouldn't I have time to bubble it in?

osgiliath · Post by **osgiliath** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:12 pm

"If I knew the answers to the last 2 were C, why wouldn't I have time to bubble it in?"

You'd have to have a distinct lack of imagination to ask this question.

Some people bubble the scantron at the end of each section or end of each page, etc, meaning they might run out of time to bubble at the end yet can easily remember the last several answers they chose.

Alternatively, if you are someone who bubbles after each question, when they call time you are only required to put your pencil down - you can still look at the test and thus might arrive at the right answer in the few seconds you have between sections. You would then physically - not speaking in moral on ethical terms - have the option of filling in that bubble at the start of the next section.

joeycxxxx09 · Post by **joeycxxxx09** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:37 pm

pancakes3 wrote:
joeycxxxx09 wrote:
pancakes3 wrote:
joeycxxxx09 wrote:Not sure why some of you are being so ruthless, this could easily be an honest mistake. The fact he erased the answers after they told him you can't do that shows that he was trying to correct the error and return it to the way it was before he made the mistake. And let's be honest, if any of you ran out of time before bubbling the last two questions on a section you would bubble those in at some point before you turned the test in.
No bro, we wouldn't. I wouldn't, anyway.
You're telling me if you bubbled in 25 of 27 RC questions, time got called while you were bubbling, and you knew both of those answers were C, you wouldn't bubble in the last two questions at some point? You would leave the 2 points on the table for the rest of the test? Lol
If I knew the answers to the last 2 were C, why wouldn't I have time to bubble it in?

Idk, maybe if they called time while you were bubbling the section in? You need some assistance

GreatBraffsby · Post by **GreatBraffsby** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:45 pm

pancakes3 wrote:
joeycxxxx09 wrote:
pancakes3 wrote:
joeycxxxx09 wrote:Not sure why some of you are being so ruthless, this could easily be an honest mistake. The fact he erased the answers after they told him you can't do that shows that he was trying to correct the error and return it to the way it was before he made the mistake. And let's be honest, if any of you ran out of time before bubbling the last two questions on a section you would bubble those in at some point before you turned the test in.
No bro, we wouldn't. I wouldn't, anyway.
You're telling me if you bubbled in 25 of 27 RC questions, time got called while you were bubbling, and you knew both of those answers were C, you wouldn't bubble in the last two questions at some point? You would leave the 2 points on the table for the rest of the test? Lol
If I knew the answers to the last 2 were C, why wouldn't I have time to bubble it in?

You can't imagine mentally figuring out what an answer is and then having the proctor call time as you're about to change it? I feel like that has to happen a decent amount, considering a lot of test takers go back to questions they skipped and work on those up until the last second expires.

pancakes3 · Post by **pancakes3** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:59 pm

Bottom line, what makes the LSAT so damn hard is the pacing. Taking advantage of the high enforcement costs of proctors monitoring post-time bubbling is flat out cheating. If you're a person who bubbles in after the whistle and didn't get caught, you should also acknowledge that what you did was cheating and don't try to minimize it or explain it.

kjartan · Post by **kjartan** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:21 pm

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

sovereign99999 · Post by **sovereign99999** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:44 pm

I have the same violation notice for working beyond time limits.

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:34 pm

sovereign99999 wrote:I have the same violation notice for working beyond time limits.

That's because you're the same person. Only one account per user is allowed, thanks.

SirArthurDayne · Post by **SirArthurDayne** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:45 pm

Post removed.

splittermcsplit88 · Post by **splittermcsplit88** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:51 pm

Are you serious lol damn we all got trolled.

rpupkin · Post by **rpupkin** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:59 pm

splittermcsplit88 wrote:Are you serious lol damn we all got trolled.

I disagree. If OP were a troll, he would have argued with y'all at length, or at least provided a more elaborate story. I don't see any indications of trolling ITT, actually.

As for the OP's sockpuppeting, it appears to be a pathetic attempt to provide himself with moral support by suggesting that others got cited for the same violation. It's very sad, but I don't think it's suggestive of trolling.

nondescript · Post by **nondescript** » Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:27 am

Some 180 level buttshit, I hope OP was this clever on the writing section

ihenry · Post by **ihenry** » Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:13 am

rpupkin wrote:
splittermcsplit88 wrote:Are you serious lol damn we all got trolled.
I disagree. If OP were a troll, he would have argued with y'all at length, or at least provided a more elaborate story. I don't see any indications of trolling ITT, actually.

As for the OP's sockpuppeting, it appears to be a pathetic attempt to provide himself with moral support by suggesting that others got cited for the same violation. It's very sad, but I don't think it's suggestive of trolling.

While this seems unkind, I can attest OP is not trolling. I've got rumors on this case elsewhere

robotrick · Post by **robotrick** » Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:22 am

splittermcsplit88 wrote:Can only imagine how bad OP must feel right now. But even if someone wanted to be sympathetic/lenient towards OP...I think it'll be hard....I mean if you can't follow/aren't aware of even the most basic rules related to your desired profession...what can I say? What are you going to tell your client when you miss the deadline for submitting your brief to court by a few minutes and they refuse to accept it?

Bolded is an absurd slippery slope argument that's also used to marginalize disabled test-takers who receive accommodations on the LSAT.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:16 am

Post removed.