Post
by dontsaywhatyoumean » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:50 pm
I certainly scored less than PT average on LG, and possibly not my best on LR, but still probably did well on LR. RC I have no freaking clue.
I'm wondering how many of you think you likely scored within a 5 point range of what you want/need on the Feb LSAT? That makes me freaking nervous, I think if I did well enough, I did just barely well enough, and if I did poorly, just barely. I think the most somewhat realistic-optimistic prediction of how I did is probably 3-4 points better than what I want/need. That seems way too close.
Worst case I think 2 points worse than what I need. For some reason I think I more likely scored lower than higher, but I don't know if that's a cognitive bias that just tends toward the pessimistic, possibly due to "conservative" predictions more likely being accurate, even though I don't know if that applies to this sort of prediction.
I mean, of course it's more likely you hit at least a 158 than a 162, but when not referring to at least, but one or the other.
