Post removed. Forum

bound · Post by **bound** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:23 am

MiracleNeeded wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:Also, the fact that you actually spent time coming up with a strategy to cheat prior to the LSAT is absolutely disgusting.
Yep, I had a strategy, and I would have used it if the opportunity had presented itself. You want to be self righteous and think your shit doesn't stink because you wouldn't bubble an answer half a second after time is called. Big whoop, you do what you have to do to get ahead. You'll learn to dispense with this silliness when you live in the real world. I would suspect you're a 20 something junior who thinks the world is rainbows and lollipops.

Dear Lord, you really do need a miracle.

MiracleNeeded · Post by **MiracleNeeded** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:25 am

Austinbound wrote:
MiracleNeeded wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:Also, the fact that you actually spent time coming up with a strategy to cheat prior to the LSAT is absolutely disgusting.
Yep, I had a strategy, and I would have used it if the opportunity had presented itself. You want to be self righteous and think your shit doesn't stink because you wouldn't bubble an answer half a second after time is called. Big whoop, you do what you have to do to get ahead. You'll learn to dispense with this silliness when you live in the real world. I would suspect you're a 20 something junior who thinks the world is rainbows and lollipops.

Dear Lord, you really do need a miracle.

Yeah you go around and follow every little rule you're told to follow like a good little sheeple. See where it gets you.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:26 am

Post removed.

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:28 am

MiracleNeeded wrote:
Austinbound wrote:
MiracleNeeded wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:Also, the fact that you actually spent time coming up with a strategy to cheat prior to the LSAT is absolutely disgusting.
Yep, I had a strategy, and I would have used it if the opportunity had presented itself. You want to be self righteous and think your shit doesn't stink because you wouldn't bubble an answer half a second after time is called. Big whoop, you do what you have to do to get ahead. You'll learn to dispense with this silliness when you live in the real world. I would suspect you're a 20 something junior who thinks the world is rainbows and lollipops.

Dear Lord, you really do need a miracle.
Yeah you go around and follow every little rule you're told to follow like a good little sheeple. See where it gets you.

omg you are actually crazy. seek help.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:28 am

Post removed.

ManoftheHour · Post by **ManoftheHour** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:30 am

scoobers wrote:
MiracleNeeded wrote:
Yeah you go around and follow every little rule you're told to follow like a good little sheeple. See where it gets you.
omg you are actually crazy. seek help.

vicpin5190 · Post by **vicpin5190** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:33 am

ManoftheHour wrote:
vicpin5190 wrote:Lets talk about something else, eh? It's the internet, yelling at someone for questionable motives won't really do anything in the grand scheme...

mean while the Dolphins won today and are 7-6. Playoffs? I think yes.
Cam Newton needs to do better. Or it's over for my fantasy football team.

Go Eagles!

I was at that Packers game this afternoon. I've never seen a group of people more elated for the late game successes of the eagles than Packers fans (a large crowd after the game crowded around a TV to watch the final 10 minutes of the Lions/Eagles game). All in good fun. Being a Florida boy, sitting in that 10 degree weather to watch football was killer, but crazy fun.

Also Nick Foles ftw (despite his pick today)

ManoftheHour · Post by **ManoftheHour** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:35 am

vicpin5190 wrote: Also Nick Foles ftw (despite his pick today)

A part of me died when I saw that.

All good things must come to an end.

I'll take the win though.

Post by **John_rizzy_rawls** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:36 am

DaRascal wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:Hearing about people cheating makes me pretty fucking mad.
Well sorry about that. His cheating has thrown a monkey wrench in our relationship.

Lol wat

muzzy · Post by **muzzy** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:38 am

angels2fly · Post by **angels2fly** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:39 am

muzzy wrote:Those last few pages were enjoyable.

At the bar tonight: man turning 49, by himself. Asked me if I was in the book deal. I said yes. He rewarded my friend and I with shots.

this made me sad then happy

vicpin5190 · Post by **vicpin5190** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:40 am

muzzy wrote:Those last few pages were enjoyable.

At the bar tonight: man turning 49, by himself. Asked me if I was in the book deal. I said yes. He rewarded my friend and I with shots.

i was rewarded with many free drinks last night because of having finished the LSAT

I felt like i was at the end of Rocky, being carried off into the sunset, Adrian by my side. And then I woke up with a throbbing headache.

muzzy · Post by **muzzy** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:43 am

ftbchamp231 · Post by **ftbchamp231** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:43 am

muzzy wrote:Those last few pages were enjoyable.

At the bar tonight: man turning 49, by himself. Asked me if I was in the book deal. I said yes. He rewarded my friend and I with shots.

That is pretty awesome. I have gone to the bar 4 times since I've turned 21 last March. I can't wait for this spring. 12 credits, 9 are basically rocks for jocks and underwater basket weaving.

Last time I went was after a big win and some alumni gave the owner enough money it was open bar for an hour (Thursday before LSAT, I didn't take advantage)

yomisterd · Post by **yomisterd** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:45 am

MiracleNeeded wrote:
DaRascal wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:
DaRascal wrote:What's your opinion of someone reviewing their answer choices on a section and suddenly realizing a wrong answer choice and the correct answer but time being called and then that person writing it down on the 1st page of the next section and going back to the answer sheet to erase the wrong choice and put in the correct one five minutes after the next section begins?
This person is objectively a shitty human.

Ok, glad we agree on that. He's a (former) friend of mine.
Are you people seriously such tight asses? Who gives a shit? Had I not been in a tiny room with only 8 others and two proctors I would have done the same. Hell I had a strategy set up where I would read the last question and answer choices while the proctor was reading instructions for the next section. Again, it wasn't a big room so going back wasn't worth the risk, but would I? Hell yeah. If it means getting a. Higher score and possibly a better future? Yeah, bubbling when you weren't supposed to doesn't really seem all that bad. You're not killing anyone, stealing from anyone. Just bubbling a question you got right all by yourself.

I hope miracle gets a shitty score so its one less machiavellian asshole in the legal field.

muzzy · Post by **muzzy** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:45 am

fpustorino · Post by **fpustorino** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:47 am

Hey guys, for anyone that had LR-LG-LR / LR-RC... apparently there has been a bunch of different views on which one was the experimental and it is literally driving me insane trying to figure it out hahaha. From what I have gathered, the LR section with a question about foxes, one with hounds, and one with giant ants was experimental. Does anybody who had the three LR section test remember which one it was? The first, second, or third (after break). And also... perhaps the number of questions that was in the experimental?

Thanks and I appreciate any possible input so that I can hopefully put my restless mind at ease (yeah right..)

dosto · Post by **dosto** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:48 am

fpustorino · Post by **fpustorino** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:49 am

How do you know it was experimental? I thought that the one before the break was as well because it seemed strange, full of assumption (more than usual) and more difficult than usual.

vicpin5190 · Post by **vicpin5190** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:50 am

fpustorino wrote:Hey guys, for anyone that had LR-LG-LR / LR-RC... apparently there has been a bunch of different views on which one was the experimental and it is literally driving me insane trying to figure it out hahaha. From what I have gathered, the LR section with a question about foxes, one with hounds, and one with giant ants was experimental. Does anybody who had the three LR section test remember which one it was? The first, second, or third (after break). And also... perhaps the number of questions that was in the experimental?

Thanks and I appreciate any possible input so that I can hopefully put my restless mind at ease (yeah right..)

I had this set up, and I"m about 70% sure that my experimental was the 2nd LR (of 3). I don't remember the questions contained in it though. Also, is it definitive that everyone gets the same type of experimental sections across test takers? I was under the assumption that it varies, both across which section people get and the questions in those sections.

dosto · Post by **dosto** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:51 am

vicpin5190 · Post by **vicpin5190** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:53 am

dosto wrote:
fpustorino wrote:How do you know it was experimental? I thought that the one before the break was as well because it seemed strange, full of assumption (more than usual) and more difficult than usual.
If you browse the earlier pages of the thread you can pretty easily see which sections people with only two LRs had. That and mine had two-question stimuli which were a dead giveaway (however I did not assume it was experimental because for all I knew, LSAC was bringing them back).

I saw this as well in my LR section and immediately felt this overwhelming assumption that I was staring at the experimental. I took it seriously because I wasn't going to be the guy who assumes incorrectly and then is staring at -20 in a section on his score report.

062914123 · Post by **062914123** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:53 am

fpustorino · Post by **fpustorino** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:53 am

Yeah I have looked through the entire thread, however it is difficult to remember which questions were on what section because it was such a blur. I think the second LR had either 26 or 27, definitely not 25

vicpin5190 · Post by **vicpin5190** » Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:55 am

Yeah to be perfectly honest I don't know how people remember what questions there were on LR. LIke RC and LG are distinctive since its really only 4 specific games/passages to remember, but with the pure # of LR questions that you go through, it all just blends in for me.