there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?
June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
-
wilt

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
it's ironic that these are called waiters threads on TLS because that's a likely post-law-school career for about a quarter of us
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
that was pretzelwilt wrote:there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?
-
Kangaroo_Court

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:37 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
.
Last edited by Kangaroo_Court on Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
is there a PW thread? are we required to post to it, as a sacrifice to LSAC gods?Smallville wrote:pretzel PW'd, ur turnwilt wrote: ugh we need more female pw in here
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
wilt

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
R. Jeeves wrote:that was pretzelwilt wrote:there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
this. duh. he's honestly sexy af.Kangaroo_Court wrote:Lady waiter here!
M Milo F Milo I will not choose anyone else because how do you all not love him
bat-shit crazy trump supporter, but i'd still smash.
- Bearlyalive

- Posts: 933
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 3:35 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I was about to post a link to the Vale of Tears, but I decided that would be too cruel. Can't destroy waiter innocence too early on.HennessyVSOP wrote:it's ironic that these are called waiters threads on TLS because that's a likely post-law-school career for about a quarter of us
Last edited by Bearlyalive on Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
if this is bc of us, none of us have been to LS yet...HennessyVSOP wrote:it's ironic that these are called waiters threads on TLS because that's a likely post-law-school career for about a quarter of us
waiter threads are for the sacrifices to the LSAC gods, PW awayHennessyVSOP wrote:is there a PW thread? are we required to post to it, as a sacrifice to LSAC gods?Smallville wrote:pretzel PW'd, ur turnwilt wrote: ugh we need more female pw in here
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
this is the PW thread, and yes.HennessyVSOP wrote:is there a PW thread? are we required to post to it, as a sacrifice to LSAC gods?Smallville wrote:pretzel PW'd, ur turnwilt wrote: ugh we need more female pw in here
eta: scooped by clark kent
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
wilt

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
its necessary to get above 170 actuallyHennessyVSOP wrote:is there a PW thread? are we required to post to it, as a sacrifice to LSAC gods?Smallville wrote:pretzel PW'd, ur turnwilt wrote: ugh we need more female pw in here
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Lemon copied pretzels PW... smh, pay attentionwilt wrote:R. Jeeves wrote:that was pretzelwilt wrote:there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?lemonparty
-
wilt

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
wouldnt than mean 2 confirmed females???Smallville wrote:Lemon copied pretzels PW... smh, pay attentionwilt wrote:R. Jeeves wrote:that was pretzelwilt wrote:there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?lemonparty
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
yeah lemonparty also posted a robe and champagne pic! we both didwilt wrote:R. Jeeves wrote:that was pretzelwilt wrote:there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?lemonparty
-
carasrook

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytimewilt wrote:wouldnt than mean 2 confirmed females???Smallville wrote:Lemon copied pretzels PW... smh, pay attentionwilt wrote:R. Jeeves wrote:that was pretzelwilt wrote:there was girl in a robe at one poiint, no??Smallville wrote:I wanna say no, I feel like I have seen some others thnx to context clues but no ideaR. Jeeves wrote:wait is pretzel is the only confirmed lady waiter itt?lemonparty
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
So much talking, so little PW'ing........
tbh I don't know if I like the PW thing. I get very attached to people's tars
tbh I don't know if I like the PW thing. I get very attached to people's tars
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
eyyyy there's another one!carasrook wrote:lady here
- Bearlyalive

- Posts: 933
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 3:35 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Well, she is still technically a waiter, but more of a graduated waiter.pretzeltime wrote:
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytime
-
wilt

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
i think we need some more PW in here fo' sure
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Can you be a waiter if you're not waiting on your own June LSAT results? JWBearlyalive wrote:Well, she is still technically a waiter, but more of a graduated waiter.pretzeltime wrote:
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytime
or maybe she took the test
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
waiting to go to LSpretzeltime wrote:Can you be a waiter if you're not waiting on your own June LSAT results? JWBearlyalive wrote:Well, she is still technically a waiter, but more of a graduated waiter.pretzeltime wrote:
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytime
or maybe she took the test
I am Superman so my PW shouldnt change anythingpretzeltime wrote:So much talking, so little PW'ing........
tbh I don't know if I like the PW thing. I get very attached to people's tars
Last edited by Smallville on Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Oooh I see.Smallville wrote:waiting to go to LSpretzeltime wrote:Can you be a waiter if you're not waiting on your own June LSAT results? JWBearlyalive wrote:Well, she is still technically a waiter, but more of a graduated waiter.pretzeltime wrote:
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytime
or maybe she took the test
- Bearlyalive

- Posts: 933
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 3:35 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Waiter refers more broadly to people waiting on various stages of the law school admissions process. There are varying grades and generations of waiters. Lemon and quite a few of the rest of us are starting school in the fall, but we're still considered "waiters" by the TLS community.pretzeltime wrote:Can you be a waiter if you're not waiting on your own June LSAT results? JWBearlyalive wrote:Well, she is still technically a waiter, but more of a graduated waiter.pretzeltime wrote:
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytime
or maybe she took the test
Last edited by Bearlyalive on Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
wait so waiter = 0L? until now i thought it meant waiting on LSAT results.pretzeltime wrote:Oooh I see.Smallville wrote:waiting to go to LSpretzeltime wrote:Can you be a waiter if you're not waiting on your own June LSAT results? JWBearlyalive wrote:Well, she is still technically a waiter, but more of a graduated waiter.pretzeltime wrote:
she's not a waiter! but she's welcome to bring her lady-ness here anytime
or maybe she took the test
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login