I posted them somewhere ITTsfoglia wrote:I know this has been discussed ad naseaum, but, can someone remind me again if there was consensus that games similar to 4 in PT72 had appeared before? LSATBlog identifies 20:3 and 23:4 as two examples of pattern games. For those who have done 72 and one of the previous, are these alike?
Really trying to avoid freaking myself the fuck out with 72, and I have almost all PTs from A-71, already, anyway.
The Official September 2014 Study Group Forum
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
- bound
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
ErgoSum wrote:bound wrote:
Marry me
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I thought so. I guess I'm going to go through your post history now. I'll let you know if I find anything interested.BillPackets wrote:I posted them somewhere ITTsfoglia wrote:I know this has been discussed ad naseaum, but, can someone remind me again if there was consensus that games similar to 4 in PT72 had appeared before? LSATBlog identifies 20:3 and 23:4 as two examples of pattern games. For those who have done 72 and one of the previous, are these alike?
Really trying to avoid freaking myself the fuck out with 72, and I have almost all PTs from A-71, already, anyway.
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Lmfao I was just trying 2 find it but I couldn't it was a pretty involved poastsfoglia wrote:I thought so. I guess I'm going to go through your post history now. I'll let you know if I find anything interested.BillPackets wrote:I posted them somewhere ITTsfoglia wrote:I know this has been discussed ad naseaum, but, can someone remind me again if there was consensus that games similar to 4 in PT72 had appeared before? LSATBlog identifies 20:3 and 23:4 as two examples of pattern games. For those who have done 72 and one of the previous, are these alike?
Really trying to avoid freaking myself the fuck out with 72, and I have almost all PTs from A-71, already, anyway.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Shut up I hated pt68 game 4. I think it is the most intensive game in lsat historyunodostres wrote:funny enough, it is the rules that dictate where you should go. so if you're stumped, i find it better to just look at the rules and play off of that. the game that comes to mind is the book club game. i think it was 68... literally nothing given. had to use rules to figure out deductions. etc
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Just got stuck on the first game question 1 on pt69 for 4 min bc I wrote GP rule down as G-P.
Just had to laugh about it, even tho it caused me to rush n miss some later in the section.
Here's to confidence boosts 50 hours out
Just had to laugh about it, even tho it caused me to rush n miss some later in the section.
Here's to confidence boosts 50 hours out
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
preptest C last gamesfoglia wrote:I thought so. I guess I'm going to go through your post history now. I'll let you know if I find anything interested.BillPackets wrote:I posted them somewhere ITTsfoglia wrote:I know this has been discussed ad naseaum, but, can someone remind me again if there was consensus that games similar to 4 in PT72 had appeared before? LSATBlog identifies 20:3 and 23:4 as two examples of pattern games. For those who have done 72 and one of the previous, are these alike?
Really trying to avoid freaking myself the fuck out with 72, and I have almost all PTs from A-71, already, anyway.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
fucking fantasticErgoSum wrote:bound wrote:
- NotASpecialSnowflake
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
In the 170-172 range. I've been higher than that on the normal timed tests I take and right around there on the 30 min tests. My goal is a -10 and I should be set.BillPackets wrote:What's your target scoreNotASpecialSnowflake wrote:A two time retaker. I'm taking the LSAT again for scholly $. I'm a reverse splitter and I know that even a few points would really help my chances.BillPackets wrote:Not a SPSF sup w u u been poastin ITT a lot more lately r u a retaker
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Just wanted to share these beautiful lines. Still digging...
BillPackets wrote:bills got a big ol train in the noggin n it doesn't stop 4 much
BillPackets wrote:my tar could b misleading in that i havent watched an NFL game for 10 years and i dont really like football
BillPackets wrote:Awards/Achievements
-Awarded "Forum Board" Pulitzer Prize on top-law-schools.com for work done regarding a hypothetical logic game concerning mirrors
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
OMG<3<3<3hereisonehand wrote: preptest C last game
Thank you. Also found Bill's poast, finally. Going to put it in a separate post for prominence.
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
BillPackets wrote:Hey guys real bored here was browsing thru the LSAT threads n noticed a thread bout game 4 from the June test. Sum1 posted similar games from the past so I thot I would share it here as we get real close to the test date.
PT1Sec2Game4
PT11Sec1Game4
PT13Sec1Game4
PT16Sec1Game4
.....
Oh also apparently the 1 from PT 11 is "extremely similar" fwiw just want to get max bey ITT
ETA: went thru the packets and found these Qs...PTs 11,13,16 r all in the MISC. packet, PT 1 is in undetermined assignment (per Cambridge drilling packets)
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Just thx fogs thx I'm sry u had 2 dig thru all the shit poasts 2 find the goodssfoglia wrote:Just wanted to share these beautiful lines. Still digging...
BillPackets wrote:bills got a big ol train in the noggin n it doesn't stop 4 muchBillPackets wrote:my tar could b misleading in that i havent watched an NFL game for 10 years and i dont really like footballBillPackets wrote:Awards/Achievements
-Awarded "Forum Board" Pulitzer Prize on top-law-schools.com for work done regarding a hypothetical logic game concerning mirrors
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:47 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Lacoste wrote:What do you like about it? Im currently in a powescore course and looking for a supplement? Since you used powerscore, would you recommend it?ALegalMind_26 wrote:Hello! I'm new to TLS, been reading the forums for a while, but just now posting. I took my first LSAT in June and I plan on taking it again in September. Trying to bump my score by at least 3 points. How's the LSAT trainer been for the others here using it? I've been using it for this LSAT, used powerscore last time, and I like the way its written. Have others found it helpful?
I would definitely recommend powerscore! It was written in a very easy to understand format, and it really broke down how to go about each question. It was honestly most helpful to me on the LG section, because it gave a really solid grasp on how to approach each problem! Definitely get the bibles and use that as a study tool!
- hetookmetoamovie
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
sometimes the pleasure is in the journey, billBillPackets wrote:Just thx fogs thx I'm sry u had 2 dig thru all the shit poasts 2 find the goodssfoglia wrote:Just wanted to share these beautiful lines. Still digging...
BillPackets wrote:bills got a big ol train in the noggin n it doesn't stop 4 muchBillPackets wrote:my tar could b misleading in that i havent watched an NFL game for 10 years and i dont really like footballBillPackets wrote:Awards/Achievements
-Awarded "Forum Board" Pulitzer Prize on top-law-schools.com for work done regarding a hypothetical logic game concerning mirrors
i'm getting a lil sad that this thread is coming to an end :'(
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
This thread is not ending
I refuse to move to another thread cuz every1 will b all freaking business
I refuse to move to another thread cuz every1 will b all freaking business
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- NotASpecialSnowflake
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Take it from a retaker, the waiting thread is always more fun.hetookmetoamovie wrote:sometimes the pleasure is in the journey, billBillPackets wrote:Just thx fogs thx I'm sry u had 2 dig thru all the shit poasts 2 find the goodssfoglia wrote:Just wanted to share these beautiful lines. Still digging...
BillPackets wrote:bills got a big ol train in the noggin n it doesn't stop 4 muchBillPackets wrote:my tar could b misleading in that i havent watched an NFL game for 10 years and i dont really like footballBillPackets wrote:Awards/Achievements
-Awarded "Forum Board" Pulitzer Prize on top-law-schools.com for work done regarding a hypothetical logic game concerning mirrors
i'm getting a lil sad that this thread is coming to an end :'(
And the "oveheard at the LSAT" thread. My favorite post on there is how a guy brought in a gallon milk jug instead of a gallon zip lock bag.
Last edited by NotASpecialSnowflake on Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Exactly, and I only went ten days deep. Can you even remember how many awesome things we've said in here?hetookmetoamovie wrote: sometimes the pleasure is in the journey, bill
i'm getting a lil sad that this thread is coming to an end :'(
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Ten days!?! I posted that more than ten days ago I know but let's just not talk bout this ne moresfoglia wrote:Exactly, and I only went ten days deep. Can you even remember how many awesome things we've said in here?hetookmetoamovie wrote: sometimes the pleasure is in the journey, bill
i'm getting a lil sad that this thread is coming to an end :'(
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
We should publish this threadsfoglia wrote:Exactly, and I only went ten days deep. Can you even remember how many awesome things we've said in here?hetookmetoamovie wrote: sometimes the pleasure is in the journey, bill
i'm getting a lil sad that this thread is coming to an end :'(
Also that gallon milk jug sitch would be amazing to witness
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I feel like we should be able to keep this thread. We'll probably be at 500 pages by Saturday. We've built a home here.BillPackets wrote:This thread is not ending
I refuse to move to another thread cuz every1 will b all freaking business
Also, OMG, just realized that there are so many color options for fonts. I should start writing secret shit.
Colonel's got a big bicep, pass it on.
- hetookmetoamovie
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
We're gonna need a montage (montage)sfoglia wrote: Exactly, and I only went ten days deep. Can you even remember how many awesome things we've said in here?
Ooh, it takes a montage (montage)
[youtube]pFrMLRQIT_k[/youtube]
- hetookmetoamovie
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
OMG I SEE COLORSsfoglia wrote:I feel like we should be able to keep this thread. We'll probably be at 500 pages by Saturday. We've built a home here.BillPackets wrote:This thread is not ending
I refuse to move to another thread cuz every1 will b all freaking business
Also, OMG, just realized that there are so many color options for fonts. I should start writing secret shit.
Colonel's got a big bicep, pass it on.
- hetookmetoamovie
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
We should publish this thread
Also that gallon milk jug sitch would be amazing to witness
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login