June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

WHATS THE FUCKING CURVE

-11
21
21%
wats a curve
8
8%
-10
5
5%
-11
16
16%
-15
4
4%
-7
6
6%
JOSÉ CURVE-O
33
33%
-12
8
8%
 
Total votes: 101

acidwash

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by acidwash » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:37 pm

god the administration of this thing sucked. other proctors kept coming in and out of the room. one time it was for a legit reason--some dude had misbubbled an entire section (i.e., bubbled 4 in section 5 or something), and they came to get him out. feel bad for that dude. the rest of the times it was to talk to our proctor, and it was super distracting.

you'd think paying $170 or whatever it was, they'd figure their shit out.

User avatar
beenoparte125

New
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 5:33 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by beenoparte125 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:38 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:hey guys, so im pretty fucking positive that my proctor called time 2 minutes early on the two sections after break. Another girl in the test center was sure of this as well, and two other people said they kinda thought that was the case. whats my move here?

fwiw i think i still did pretty well, but its always hard to say. mistakes can happen, and without those final two minutes, I didnt get to check if I made any.

WERE YOU AT SUFFOLK?????

it happened there.
yes i was at suffolk. 4th floor?
YES.

THAT HAPPENED. I WAS THERE.

Nobody said anything so I thought I was going crazy but then by the 4th or so section I knew

What the fuck do we do, we can't really do anything
Not having those 2 min would have seriously effed me

acidwash

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by acidwash » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:38 pm

somewhatferal wrote:
acidwash wrote:
CPA-->JD wrote:Anybody else have 2 RC?
Yeah, and I thought one was significantly easier. Was the one about African weaving real?
I didn't have African weaving, and I had one RC.
yeah, figures. i thought this section was the easier one.

User avatar
ayylmao

Silver
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ayylmao » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:38 pm

HOLY SHIT I FUCKING DID IT! I TOOK THE LSAT!!!!

I had two LGs. One was literally the easiest I have ever done, the other was reallly hard. Did any of you have a game with people manning a state fair?

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by appind » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:39 pm

R. Jeeves wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:hey guys, so im pretty fucking positive that my proctor called time 2 minutes early on the two sections after break. Another girl in the test center was sure of this as well, and two other people said they kinda thought that was the case. whats my move here?

fwiw i think i still did pretty well, but its always hard to say. mistakes can happen, and without those final two minutes, I didnt get to check if I made any.

WERE YOU AT SUFFOLK?????

it happened there.
yes i was at suffolk. 4th floor?

how did you know that time was being called early?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by proteinshake » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:39 pm

you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.

User avatar
audaz

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:11 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by audaz » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:40 pm

ayylmao wrote:HOLY SHIT I FUCKING DID IT! I TOOK THE LSAT!!!!

I had two LGs. One was literally the easiest I have ever done, the other was reallly hard. Did any of you have a game with people manning a state fair?
1920's was real

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:42 pm

appind wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:hey guys, so im pretty fucking positive that my proctor called time 2 minutes early on the two sections after break. Another girl in the test center was sure of this as well, and two other people said they kinda thought that was the case. whats my move here?

fwiw i think i still did pretty well, but its always hard to say. mistakes can happen, and without those final two minutes, I didnt get to check if I made any.

WERE YOU AT SUFFOLK?????

it happened there.
yes i was at suffolk. 4th floor?

how did you know that time was being called early?
SImply put he called it around the 33 mark 4 times.

I actually brought TWO watches and thought I was going crazy the first time and switched the watch. Still happened. But nobody else around me was reacting and nobody said anything during break so I thought I was nuts

Already getting confirmation from others that it happened.....

User avatar
Dcc617

Gold
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Dcc617 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:42 pm

proteinshake wrote:you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.
But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


CPA-->JD

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 12:30 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by CPA-->JD » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm

acidwash wrote:
somewhatferal wrote:
acidwash wrote:
CPA-->JD wrote:Anybody else have 2 RC?
Yeah, and I thought one was significantly easier. Was the one about African weaving real?
I didn't have African weaving, and I had one RC.
yeah, figures. i thought this section was the easier one.
Yea thought it was much easier as well. Finished with 8 minutes left. Too bad:(

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by R. Jeeves » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm

.
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somethingElse » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm

Dcc617 wrote:
proteinshake wrote:you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.
But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.
QFP, seems like Dcc has better info on this than I do maybe?

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Smallville » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:44 pm

oh noes :/ that sucks, I deff would have said something.... if my watch was off by 10 sec or so I could ignore it was human error but 2 minutes, no wai. Like somethingelse said, you can complain but absolute best case would be you could option to cancel score and get a free retake, or they could simply make a note of the report. that would destroy me on RC and wouldnt make LR all that fun

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:44 pm

Dcc617 wrote:
proteinshake wrote:you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.
But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.
Or just the asterisk about the test, yeah? Like something_else mentioned.

Not that that really helps.

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by R. Jeeves » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:45 pm

Dcc617 wrote:
proteinshake wrote:you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.
But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.
this sucks dick.

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:45 pm

Smallville wrote:oh noes :/ that sucks, I deff would have said something.... if my watch was off by 10 sec or so I could ignore it was human error but 2 minutes, no wai. Like somethingelse said, you can complain but absolute best case would be you could option to cancel score and get a free retake, or they could simply make a note of the report. that would destroy me on RC and wouldnt make LR all that fun
Yeah I mean...I should have said something the second time it happened.

The problem is, when he said "5 minutes left" and there were clearly 7, if you raise your hand you're risking fucking up the test for everyone or at least for yourself so I didn't think it was worth it

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:46 pm

R. Jeeves wrote:
Dcc617 wrote:
proteinshake wrote:you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.
But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.
this sucks dick.
it sucks major dick. also, glad that the universe brought us together Jeevesy so I could confirm this madness the second I got home.......... ugh

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by appind » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:46 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
appind wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:hey guys, so im pretty fucking positive that my proctor called time 2 minutes early on the two sections after break. Another girl in the test center was sure of this as well, and two other people said they kinda thought that was the case. whats my move here?

fwiw i think i still did pretty well, but its always hard to say. mistakes can happen, and without those final two minutes, I didnt get to check if I made any.

WERE YOU AT SUFFOLK?????

it happened there.
yes i was at suffolk. 4th floor?

how did you know that time was being called early?
SImply put he called it around the 33 mark 4 times.

I actually brought TWO watches and thought I was going crazy the first time and switched the watch. Still happened. But nobody else around me was reacting and nobody said anything during break so I thought I was nuts

Already getting confirmation from others that it happened.....
E: phone double post
Last edited by appind on Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by appind » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:47 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
appind wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:hey guys, so im pretty fucking positive that my proctor called time 2 minutes early on the two sections after break. Another girl in the test center was sure of this as well, and two other people said they kinda thought that was the case. whats my move here?

fwiw i think i still did pretty well, but its always hard to say. mistakes can happen, and without those final two minutes, I didnt get to check if I made any.

WERE YOU AT SUFFOLK?????

it happened there.
yes i was at suffolk. 4th floor?

how did you know that time was being called early?
SImply put he called it around the 33 mark 4 times.

I actually brought TWO watches and thought I was going crazy the first time and switched the watch. Still happened. But nobody else around me was reacting and nobody said anything during break so I thought I was nuts

Already getting confirmation from others that it happened.....
Lsac shouldnt let these incompetents run the test who can't even count the time. any reason it was sharp 33 min and not sth else?

you could write to them describing this in detail

User avatar
ayylmao

Silver
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ayylmao » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:48 pm

audaz wrote:
ayylmao wrote:HOLY SHIT I FUCKING DID IT! I TOOK THE LSAT!!!!

I had two LGs. One was literally the easiest I have ever done, the other was reallly hard. Did any of you have a game with people manning a state fair?
1920's was real
Did you also have tables at a fair?

somewhatferal

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somewhatferal » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:49 pm

I had one LG, and I don't remember tables at a fair.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
polkadotsareqt

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by polkadotsareqt » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:49 pm

louis48089 wrote:For those who usually go -1/0 on LG, did you think LG was run of the mill?
Got -0 on LG for my last LSAT, and -2 max on Preptests 52-77 for LG.

This one I had to guess on 4, ran out of time.

WTF happened. Like what the actual fuck

Anyone else want to commiserate with me?

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Smallville » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:50 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:oh noes :/ that sucks, I deff would have said something.... if my watch was off by 10 sec or so I could ignore it was human error but 2 minutes, no wai. Like somethingelse said, you can complain but absolute best case would be you could option to cancel score and get a free retake, or they could simply make a note of the report. that would destroy me on RC and wouldnt make LR all that fun
Yeah I mean...I should have said something the second time it happened.

The problem is, when he said "5 minutes left" and there were clearly 7, if you raise your hand you're risking fucking up the test for everyone or at least for yourself so I didn't think it was worth it
well its not uncommon for someone to ask atleast 1 question throughout the test so raising your hand wouldnt cause too much of a commotion if you just quickly mention something and point out ur watch. I mean a few seconds of commotion at the end would totally be worth adding 2 minutes on but shoulda woulda coulda

User avatar
polkadotsareqt

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by polkadotsareqt » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:51 pm

appind wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
appind wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:hey guys, so im pretty fucking positive that my proctor called time 2 minutes early on the two sections after break. Another girl in the test center was sure of this as well, and two other people said they kinda thought that was the case. whats my move here?

fwiw i think i still did pretty well, but its always hard to say. mistakes can happen, and without those final two minutes, I didnt get to check if I made any.

WERE YOU AT SUFFOLK?????

it happened there.
yes i was at suffolk. 4th floor?

how did you know that time was being called early?
SImply put he called it around the 33 mark 4 times.

I actually brought TWO watches and thought I was going crazy the first time and switched the watch. Still happened. But nobody else around me was reacting and nobody said anything during break so I thought I was nuts

Already getting confirmation from others that it happened.....
Lsac shouldnt let these incompetents run the test who can't even count the time. any reason it was sharp 33 min and not sth else?

you could write to them describing this in detail
Dude I was at Suffolk too. Hi Bostonians :p

My proctors were extremely annoying. Kept hovering over our shoulders and whispering during the test. That 2 minutes thing is messed up though. Definitely report.

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:51 pm

Smallville wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
Smallville wrote:oh noes :/ that sucks, I deff would have said something.... if my watch was off by 10 sec or so I could ignore it was human error but 2 minutes, no wai. Like somethingelse said, you can complain but absolute best case would be you could option to cancel score and get a free retake, or they could simply make a note of the report. that would destroy me on RC and wouldnt make LR all that fun
Yeah I mean...I should have said something the second time it happened.

The problem is, when he said "5 minutes left" and there were clearly 7, if you raise your hand you're risking fucking up the test for everyone or at least for yourself so I didn't think it was worth it
well its not uncommon for someone to ask atleast 1 question throughout the test so raising your hand wouldnt cause too much of a commotion if you just quickly mention something and point out ur watch. I mean a few seconds of commotion at the end would totally be worth adding 2 minutes on but shoulda woulda coulda
Yeah again it's this weird thing where I was thinking "no one else is saying anything so I must be wrong" but then everyone else was thinking that too

the proctor guy was kind of a gruff asshole so I also didn't want to fuck with him really

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”