You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.Roundhill wrote:Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Last edited by LitigatingLiar on Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I read this as Field Goal block and was disappointing that i didnt have a football related logic games section.Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Also the curve is gunna be murderrrrrrrr
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
The only LR question that really gave me problems time-wise was the question about Psychology/reduction Q
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Thank god the LSAT doesn't require us to block a field goal.jnwa wrote:I read this as Field Goal block and was disappointing that i didnt have a football related logic games section.Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Also the curve is gunna be murderrrrrrrr
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Jumping in this discussion to help out. Using powerscore's website, -10 on 101 happened on June 2008 and -8 happened on 101 for December 2005. Other than those two instances, -10 on 101 has not happened since June 2005!! I'm hoping it is not -10 though. RC murdered me.RonnyDiniro wrote:Why do you say thatLi'l Sebastian wrote:There's no way a 101 Q test will have a -10 curve.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Eff that question. I was cluelessPoopNpants wrote:The only LR question that really gave me problems time-wise was the question about Psychology/reduction Q
- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I have no idea how I performed on this test, other than I did good on games.
I feel worse than I felt in June, but I've begun to realize I can't accurately predict my score from test to test so I'm okay with patiently, calmly, and cool-headedly waiting for my score for the next few weeks.
I feel worse than I felt in June, but I've begun to realize I can't accurately predict my score from test to test so I'm okay with patiently, calmly, and cool-headedly waiting for my score for the next few weeks.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
LitigatingLiar wrote:You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.Roundhill wrote:Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
And KLG was definitely the real game? I wasn't sure how to go about solving it because the 1st question in that game left two possible permutations?
- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,
I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
lmao -8 for 101 wtf kind of test is that. Was the LG section just straight linear games.jleon25 wrote:Jumping in this discussion to help out. Using powerscore's website, -10 on 101 happened on June 2008 and -8 happened on 101 for December 2005. Other than those two instances, -10 on 101 has not happened since June 2005!! I'm hoping it is not -10 though. RC murdered me.RonnyDiniro wrote:Why do you say thatLi'l Sebastian wrote:There's no way a 101 Q test will have a -10 curve.
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Make a poll!Li'l Sebastian wrote:OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,
I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
+180Li'l Sebastian wrote:OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,
I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
You say that now.............Li'l Sebastian wrote:I have no idea how I performed on this test, other than I did good on games.
I feel worse than I felt in June, but I've begun to realize I can't accurately predict my score from test to test so I'm okay with patiently, calmly, and cool-headedly waiting for my score for the next few weeks.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:54 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
church question stumped me
- Roundhill
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I had KLG, L not 1,3,5 game so I'm assuming it was real.robz77 wrote:LitigatingLiar wrote:You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.Roundhill wrote:Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
And KLG was definitely the real game? I wasn't sure how to go about solving it because the 1st question in that game left two possible permutations?
- jb111
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:35 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Agreed man. I've had fun waiting but I'm ready now!Li'l Sebastian wrote:OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,
I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Roundhill wrote:Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Yes, with only five slots. Was that real?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- splitterfromhell
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
This thread is so much more hopping than Feb prep & discussion thread. Where were all of you guys before, hmm? HMM???
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
- Li'l Sebastian
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
That's exactly what I'm wondering Abbey!AbbeyS wrote:This thread is so much more hopping than Feb prep & discussion thread. Where were all of you guys before, hmm? HMM???
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
That was the only LG section you had? KGL where L couldnt be in 1, 3, 5?Roundhill wrote:I had KLG, L not 1,3,5 game so I'm assuming it was real.robz77 wrote:LitigatingLiar wrote:You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.Roundhill wrote:Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
And KLG was definitely the real game? I wasn't sure how to go about solving it because the 1st question in that game left two possible permutations?
- AbbeyS
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
Will we get to know the curve? Or literally JUST our converted score & percentile? If not why are we stressing about the curve
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:40 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm
Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread
do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)hottytoddy1 wrote:also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusionrobz77 wrote:because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login