The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

What score did you get?

Mythical 180
4
4%
170-179
22
22%
160-169
45
46%
150-159
21
21%
140-149
4
4%
130-139
0
No votes
120-129
2
2%
 
Total votes: 98

LitigatingLiar

Bronze
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by LitigatingLiar » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:13 pm

Roundhill wrote:
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?
You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.
Last edited by LitigatingLiar on Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jnwa

Silver
Posts: 1125
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jnwa » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:14 pm

Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
I read this as Field Goal block and was disappointing that i didnt have a football related logic games section.
Also the curve is gunna be murderrrrrrrr

PoopNpants

Silver
Posts: 854
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by PoopNpants » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:14 pm

The only LR question that really gave me problems time-wise was the question about Psychology/reduction Q

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm

jnwa wrote:
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
I read this as Field Goal block and was disappointing that i didnt have a football related logic games section.
Also the curve is gunna be murderrrrrrrr
Thank god the LSAT doesn't require us to block a field goal.

jleon25

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jleon25 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm

RonnyDiniro wrote:
Li'l Sebastian wrote:There's no way a 101 Q test will have a -10 curve.
Why do you say that
Jumping in this discussion to help out. Using powerscore's website, -10 on 101 happened on June 2008 and -8 happened on 101 for December 2005. Other than those two instances, -10 on 101 has not happened since June 2005!! I'm hoping it is not -10 though. RC murdered me.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm

PoopNpants wrote:The only LR question that really gave me problems time-wise was the question about Psychology/reduction Q
Eff that question. I was clueless

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm

I have no idea how I performed on this test, other than I did good on games.

I feel worse than I felt in June, but I've begun to realize I can't accurately predict my score from test to test so I'm okay with patiently, calmly, and cool-headedly waiting for my score for the next few weeks.

robz77

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by robz77 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:16 pm

LitigatingLiar wrote:
Roundhill wrote:
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?
You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.

And KLG was definitely the real game? I wasn't sure how to go about solving it because the 1st question in that game left two possible permutations?

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:17 pm

OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,

I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
jnwa

Silver
Posts: 1125
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jnwa » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:17 pm

jleon25 wrote:
RonnyDiniro wrote:
Li'l Sebastian wrote:There's no way a 101 Q test will have a -10 curve.
Why do you say that
Jumping in this discussion to help out. Using powerscore's website, -10 on 101 happened on June 2008 and -8 happened on 101 for December 2005. Other than those two instances, -10 on 101 has not happened since June 2005!! I'm hoping it is not -10 though. RC murdered me.
lmao -8 for 101 wtf kind of test is that. Was the LG section just straight linear games.

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:17 pm

Li'l Sebastian wrote:OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,

I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
Make a poll!

User avatar
jnwa

Silver
Posts: 1125
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jnwa » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:17 pm

Li'l Sebastian wrote:OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,

I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
+180

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:18 pm

Li'l Sebastian wrote:I have no idea how I performed on this test, other than I did good on games.

I feel worse than I felt in June, but I've begun to realize I can't accurately predict my score from test to test so I'm okay with patiently, calmly, and cool-headedly waiting for my score for the next few weeks.
You say that now.............

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


ftge232

Bronze
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:54 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by ftge232 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:18 pm

church question stumped me

User avatar
Roundhill

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Roundhill » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:18 pm

robz77 wrote:
LitigatingLiar wrote:
Roundhill wrote:
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?
You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.

And KLG was definitely the real game? I wasn't sure how to go about solving it because the 1st question in that game left two possible permutations?
I had KLG, L not 1,3,5 game so I'm assuming it was real.

User avatar
jb111

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:35 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jb111 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:18 pm

Li'l Sebastian wrote:OKAY I'M TIRED OF WAITING,

I WANT MY SCORE ALREADY
Agreed man. I've had fun waiting but I'm ready now!

Clark1993

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Clark1993 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:19 pm

Roundhill wrote:
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?

Yes, with only five slots. Was that real?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:19 pm

I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:20 pm

This thread is so much more hopping than Feb prep & discussion thread. Where were all of you guys before, hmm? HMM???

robz77

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by robz77 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:20 pm

splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!

User avatar
Li'l Sebastian

Gold
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:57 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Li'l Sebastian » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:21 pm

AbbeyS wrote:This thread is so much more hopping than Feb prep & discussion thread. Where were all of you guys before, hmm? HMM???
That's exactly what I'm wondering Abbey!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Clark1993

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Clark1993 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:22 pm

Roundhill wrote:
robz77 wrote:
LitigatingLiar wrote:
Roundhill wrote:
Clark1993 wrote:Does anyone know if the real LG had a game that required an FG block? One was an overbooked ordering game with six things and five slots. Does that sound familiar? the 6h slot had to be K/L
Was there a rule in it where L could not be in 1, 3, 5?
You two are mixing to different games. L not in 1, 3, or 5 had three people K,L, G. K couldn't sit before G or vice versa, can't remember.

And KLG was definitely the real game? I wasn't sure how to go about solving it because the 1st question in that game left two possible permutations?
I had KLG, L not 1,3,5 game so I'm assuming it was real.
That was the only LG section you had? KGL where L couldnt be in 1, 3, 5?

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:23 pm

Will we get to know the curve? Or literally JUST our converted score & percentile? If not why are we stressing about the curve

hottytoddy1

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:40 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by hottytoddy1 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:23 pm

robz77 wrote:
splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!
also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusion

robz77

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:43 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by robz77 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:24 pm

hottytoddy1 wrote:
robz77 wrote:
splitterfromhell wrote:I don't get how there are still people asking which games were real. They are posted all over this thread.
because many of us can't remember the specifics and we only remember certain small aspects of each game!
also i've seen a few people combine games so there's a good bit of confusion
do you possibly remember what your real games were? (preferably in the order you saw them and with as much detail as possible?)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”