Non-traditionsl LS applicants Forum

(Please Ask Questions and Answer Questions)
Post Reply
GruffGadfly

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:06 am

Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by GruffGadfly » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:00 am

What qualifies? I know that in regards to undergraduate studies, if you're over 25 you're considered non-traditional. What circumstances determine whether a law student is non-traditional? Is there any advantage/disadvantage for non-traditional students when applying to law school, in their perception as a law student, or in finding a job?

User avatar
McAvoy

Gold
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by McAvoy » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:11 am

Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:16 am

GruffGadfly wrote:What qualifies? I know that in regards to undergraduate studies, if you're over 25 you're considered non-traditional. What circumstances determine whether a law student is non-traditional? Is there any advantage/disadvantage for non-traditional students when applying to law school, in their perception as a law student, or in finding a job?
Technically I think anyone who takes time off between UG and LS is non-traditional, but it's more like a spectrum - the longer you're out, the more non-traditional you are.

Being non-trad isn't an issue in itself with getting in/going to school/getting a job. It depends more on what you did instead of going to straight through, and for how long. Sometimes previous experience is a boon, sometimes it doesn't make any difference. I think there's a perception that once you get into your 40s-50s it can be tough to get biglaw, but that also kind of depends on the candidate.

03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by 03152016 » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:58 pm

fwiw 74% of the incoming class at my school didn't go straight through

kartelite

Bronze
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by kartelite » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:57 am

McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


GruffGadfly

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:06 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by GruffGadfly » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:15 pm

kartelite wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.
This is closer to the mark, yeah. I'll be 28/29 when I start applying; I type well enough, lol.

I think that as far as classes and such go, being a bit older may help (as far as expectations, time management, etc.). I just wanted to get some clarification on whether or not being older might impact my cycle at all. I'm still relatively young, but a bit older than most ls applicants. I know the TLS consensus is that if the numbers are there the rest is of only marginal importance, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing some little caveat that doesn't come up often.

Anyway, yeah, I worry too much. Thanks for the responses, folks.

User avatar
McAvoy

Gold
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by McAvoy » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:20 pm

kartelite wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.
was ribbing OP for the typo in thread name

GruffGadfly

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:06 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by GruffGadfly » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:36 pm

Bahaha, didn't even notice until you said that. I is smart, I is good at skool.

kartelite

Bronze
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by kartelite » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:40 pm

McAvoy wrote:
kartelite wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.
was ribbing OP for the typo in thread name
Lol touché

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Ask a Law Student”