Non-traditionsl LS applicants Forum

(Please Ask Questions and Answer Questions)
Post Reply
GruffGadfly

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:06 am

Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by GruffGadfly » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:00 am

What qualifies? I know that in regards to undergraduate studies, if you're over 25 you're considered non-traditional. What circumstances determine whether a law student is non-traditional? Is there any advantage/disadvantage for non-traditional students when applying to law school, in their perception as a law student, or in finding a job?

User avatar
McAvoy

Gold
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by McAvoy » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:11 am

Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:16 am

GruffGadfly wrote:What qualifies? I know that in regards to undergraduate studies, if you're over 25 you're considered non-traditional. What circumstances determine whether a law student is non-traditional? Is there any advantage/disadvantage for non-traditional students when applying to law school, in their perception as a law student, or in finding a job?
Technically I think anyone who takes time off between UG and LS is non-traditional, but it's more like a spectrum - the longer you're out, the more non-traditional you are.

Being non-trad isn't an issue in itself with getting in/going to school/getting a job. It depends more on what you did instead of going to straight through, and for how long. Sometimes previous experience is a boon, sometimes it doesn't make any difference. I think there's a perception that once you get into your 40s-50s it can be tough to get biglaw, but that also kind of depends on the candidate.

03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by 03152016 » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:58 pm

fwiw 74% of the incoming class at my school didn't go straight through

kartelite

Bronze
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by kartelite » Mon Sep 29, 2014 7:57 am

McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.

GruffGadfly

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:06 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by GruffGadfly » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:15 pm

kartelite wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.
This is closer to the mark, yeah. I'll be 28/29 when I start applying; I type well enough, lol.

I think that as far as classes and such go, being a bit older may help (as far as expectations, time management, etc.). I just wanted to get some clarification on whether or not being older might impact my cycle at all. I'm still relatively young, but a bit older than most ls applicants. I know the TLS consensus is that if the numbers are there the rest is of only marginal importance, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing some little caveat that doesn't come up often.

Anyway, yeah, I worry too much. Thanks for the responses, folks.

User avatar
McAvoy

Gold
Posts: 1584
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:33 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by McAvoy » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:20 pm

kartelite wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.
was ribbing OP for the typo in thread name

GruffGadfly

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:06 am

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by GruffGadfly » Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:36 pm

Bahaha, didn't even notice until you said that. I is smart, I is good at skool.

kartelite

Bronze
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Non-traditionsl LS applicants

Post by kartelite » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:40 pm

McAvoy wrote:
kartelite wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Lack of ability to type might be the biggest disadvantage for olds
I think in this context "non-traditional" generally means 30s, possibly 40s, not someone who wrote their honors thesis on a typewriter. I could routinely hit 100 wpm when many of my classmates were in preschool.
was ribbing OP for the typo in thread name
Lol touché

Post Reply

Return to “Ask a Law Student”