Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four? Forum
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 9:38 pm
Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Greetings TLS, longtime lurker but first time poster here! I have a slight predicament I would like an opinion on.
I currently attend a private university where I compete at the NCAA Division 1 level. I have calculated my projected GPA upon graduating in 4 years and I will be at about a 3.4. The problem is, I have found out that it will take me an extra semester to graduate which means I would have to pay a lot of money for an additional semester at this private university.
I have the opportunity to transfer to another D1 university in which they are much more competitive in my sport and it is a public university which essentially means the tuition for attending this university for an additional semester is abysmal and I wouldn't mind actually attending for a full year to help boost my gpa and compete in my sport. Would it be a benefit to transfer to this public university and delay graduation a year to use up my remaining NCAA eligibility (1 year), take additional units to boost my gpa, and compete at a higher level? Depending on how well I do during this additional year, the potential of graduating with a 3.6 is probable. Obviously the goal is to increase my gpa to improve my law school prospects but there are also several other benefits unless I am missing something.
Edit: (Just some extra info)
-The school I am transferring to is lower ranked than my current university
-URM
-PTing in 166-168 range (included to create a better picture of what I could be working with upon graduation paired with "3.4-3.6" GPA)
I currently attend a private university where I compete at the NCAA Division 1 level. I have calculated my projected GPA upon graduating in 4 years and I will be at about a 3.4. The problem is, I have found out that it will take me an extra semester to graduate which means I would have to pay a lot of money for an additional semester at this private university.
I have the opportunity to transfer to another D1 university in which they are much more competitive in my sport and it is a public university which essentially means the tuition for attending this university for an additional semester is abysmal and I wouldn't mind actually attending for a full year to help boost my gpa and compete in my sport. Would it be a benefit to transfer to this public university and delay graduation a year to use up my remaining NCAA eligibility (1 year), take additional units to boost my gpa, and compete at a higher level? Depending on how well I do during this additional year, the potential of graduating with a 3.6 is probable. Obviously the goal is to increase my gpa to improve my law school prospects but there are also several other benefits unless I am missing something.
Edit: (Just some extra info)
-The school I am transferring to is lower ranked than my current university
-URM
-PTing in 166-168 range (included to create a better picture of what I could be working with upon graduation paired with "3.4-3.6" GPA)
Last edited by SubOneFifty on Sun May 18, 2014 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Lol, ranking don't matter.
Enjoy competing in sports and college parties for one more year. Take a bunch of easy classes to bring up that GPA.
Enjoy competing in sports and college parties for one more year. Take a bunch of easy classes to bring up that GPA.
- mt2165
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:58 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
So I am also a D1 athlete. I don't think it would be detrimental to go for five years especially if it meant a higher GPA and you used that time wisely, since you're still be K-JD. But at the same time, a more competitive program likely means more time for practice/treatment/traveling/etc so I wouldn't assume you're grades will automatically get better though you have the capacity to do so. Also I think D1 athlete is a relatively significant soft that you can play up pretty well, esp in your PS. I wish I would've done a better job in that regard. Best of luck and represent for us athletes.SubOneFifty wrote:Greetings TLS, longtime lurker but first time poster here! I have a slight predicament I would like an opinion on.
I currently attend a private university where I compete at the NCAA Division 1 level. I have calculated my projected GPA upon graduating in 4 years and I will be at about a 3.4. The problem is, I have found out that it will take me an extra semester to graduate which means I would have to pay a lot of money for an additional semester at this private university.
I have the opportunity to transfer to another D1 university in which they are much more competitive in my sport and it is a public university which essentially means the tuition for attending this university for an additional semester is abysmal and I wouldn't mind actually attending for a full year to help boost my gpa and compete in my sport. Would it be a benefit to transfer to this public university and delay graduation a year to use up my remaining NCAA eligibility (1 year), take additional units to boost my gpa, and compete at a higher level? Obviously the goal is to increase my gpa to improve my law school prospects but there are also several other benefits unless I am missing something.
Edit: The school I am transferring to is lower ranked than my current university
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
I'm sorry if I didn't make it clear enough.
Your plan is good to go. Raise that GPA. Your GPA gets locked in as soon as you get your first bachelor's.
Your plan is good to go. Raise that GPA. Your GPA gets locked in as soon as you get your first bachelor's.
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
I assume you are aware of the NCAA regulations if your intention is to transfer and to begin immediately competing for the new institution. If not, I advise you take a look at them.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mt2165
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:58 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Yeah you have to take a year offkartelite wrote:I assume you are aware of the NCAA regulations if your intention is to transfer and to begin immediately competing for the new institution. If not, I advise you take a look at them.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:49 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Please do not give "advice" about things you are unfamiliar with. It doesn't help anyone.mt2165 wrote:Yeah you have to take a year offkartelite wrote:I assume you are aware of the NCAA regulations if your intention is to transfer and to begin immediately competing for the new institution. If not, I advise you take a look at them.
Sitting out a year is not required for any sport other than football, basketball, and men's hockey. And, I would assume that the OP, being a scholarship athlete who has clearly put time and thought into considering the transfer, would be aware of any restrictions. He obviously doesn't play one of those three sports, and is fine.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 9:38 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Edit: this @ above haha.
- mt2165
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:58 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Lol, well I wouldn't say I'm completely unfamiliar, I am a D1 athlete myself, it was my understanding that that rule applied across the board but I'm sure you're right, I apologize. But I also wouldn't assume that the OP knows better, I considered transferring at one point and didn't know a lot of the NCAA compliance and regulations issues.sundontshine wrote:Please do not give "advice" about things you are unfamiliar with. It doesn't help anyone.mt2165 wrote:Yeah you have to take a year offkartelite wrote:I assume you are aware of the NCAA regulations if your intention is to transfer and to begin immediately competing for the new institution. If not, I advise you take a look at them.
Sitting out a year is not required for any sport other than football, basketball, and men's hockey. And, I would assume that the OP, being a scholarship athlete who has clearly put time and thought into considering the transfer, would be aware of any restrictions. He obviously doesn't play one of those three sports, and is fine.
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Is that a new rule? I was an NCAA athlete who transferred schools in 2003, and I'm pretty sure there weren't any exceptions for certain sports; if you got a waiver from your school's athletic department you wouldn't have to sit out.sundontshine wrote:Please do not give "advice" about things you are unfamiliar with. It doesn't help anyone.mt2165 wrote:Yeah you have to take a year offkartelite wrote:I assume you are aware of the NCAA regulations if your intention is to transfer and to begin immediately competing for the new institution. If not, I advise you take a look at them.
Sitting out a year is not required for any sport other than football, basketball, and men's hockey. And, I would assume that the OP, being a scholarship athlete who has clearly put time and thought into considering the transfer, would be aware of any restrictions. He obviously doesn't play one of those three sports, and is fine.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:49 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
The rule is still largely as you describe it, though I'm not sure if anything has actually changed since 2003. You still need the waiver from your school if you want to transfer and not sit out a year. The three sports come into play in that even with a school waiver you still have to sit out a year in basketball, football, and men's hockey. It takes extenuating circumstances (ill family member so you want to be closer to home, etc.) to transfer in those sports and play right away.kartelite wrote:Is that a new rule? I was an NCAA athlete who transferred schools in 2003, and I'm pretty sure there weren't any exceptions for certain sports; if you got a waiver from your school's athletic department you wouldn't have to sit out.
I'm not really aware of schools withholding consent for a player to transfer, even to rivals, which is why I made it seem more automatic than I suppose it actually is.
- iamgeorgebush
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
you want to transfer to a worse school for ONE semester...you do realize that the institution that confers your degree will be the last institution you attend, right? and that will stay with you for the rest of your life?
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:49 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
We'd need to know more about the disparity in rankings between the schools before criticizing that. If he's transferring from Harvard to Podunk State U, then yeah. But if he's transferring between two schools in the middle of the pack without national reputations, with the one he's heading to being just a little bit lower regarded than the original school, it might not be as big of a deal.iamgeorgebush wrote:you want to transfer to a worse school for ONE semester...you do realize that the institution that confers your degree will be the last institution you attend, right? and that will stay with you for the rest of your life?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- iamgeorgebush
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
well i didn't say that he shouldn't transfer. i just wanted him to realize the implications of doing so.sundontshine wrote:We'd need to know more about the disparity in rankings between the schools before criticizing that. If he's transferring from Harvard to Podunk State U, then yeah. But if he's transferring between two schools in the middle of the pack without national reputations, with the one he's heading to being just a little bit lower regarded than the original school, it might not be as big of a deal.iamgeorgebush wrote:you want to transfer to a worse school for ONE semester...you do realize that the institution that confers your degree will be the last institution you attend, right? and that will stay with you for the rest of your life?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 9:38 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Yes, I do understand that the last institution I attend would be the institution that grants my final degree (should be obvious?). And I wouldn't be transferring for one semester, it would be for a full YEAR since it is a public university with cheap tuition. The situation is if it would be to my benefit in doing so to potentially increase my gpa maximum to 3.6 while minimizing debt significantly and competing for an additional year.
Further explained:
Current Situation:
-Stay at private university
-Graduate a semester late (high tuition)
-Potential final GPA of 3.4
Proposed Solution:
-Transfer to a public university (will be degree granting university)
-Instead of graduating a semester late, graduate a YEAR late (since tuition is dirt cheap, classes are easy af and why not?)
-Potential final GPA of 3.6
-Use up my remaining year of NCAA eligibility (due to redshirting a year previously)
Further explained:
Current Situation:
-Stay at private university
-Graduate a semester late (high tuition)
-Potential final GPA of 3.4
Proposed Solution:
-Transfer to a public university (will be degree granting university)
-Instead of graduating a semester late, graduate a YEAR late (since tuition is dirt cheap, classes are easy af and why not?)
-Potential final GPA of 3.6
-Use up my remaining year of NCAA eligibility (due to redshirting a year previously)
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: Graduate in Five Years Instead of Four?
Transfer and enjoy your last year of eligibility. Law schools care about what your GPA is not where you earned it. It would be better to have a 3.8 from UMass than a 3.3 from Harvard, assuming the same LSAT. While this seems absurd, this is what US News incentives the law schools to do. I spoke with an admissions officer from a T-14 about this and he was joking that a higher GPA from an online school would be regarded with higher esteem than a GPA from MIT, which is why he says he hates US News.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login