TLS Consensus of JD/MBA Forum
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
In some circumstances, yes. In most circumstances, no.
- Cicero76
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
twentypercentmore wrote:In some circumstancesAt Harvard, yes. In most circumstances, no.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Not quite so cut and dry.
The general rhetoric is that a JD/MBA creates a "noticeable" boost in hiring, and is definitely not worth 90k+ and a year of school. However, that's kind of limiting. If I was looking at a full ride at Penn + sticker MBA versus HLS/HBS with close to sticker at both, I would absolutely do Penn. Frankly, even if it was half scholarship, I'd probably go with Penn.
The schools where you can justify doing a JD/MBA are Harvard, Stanford, Penn, Chicago, Northwestern, Berkeley, and Columbia. Maybe UCLA or Duke if you have ties to either area. On top of that, you can't just go, "Oh, I got into Chicago JD/MBA, so obviously I should do both." The profile of someone it makes sense for is someone who's been in the workforce for 4-5 years in a position an MBA would realistically help, AND that person receives substantial money at the law school/business school.
The reason why Northwestern has a disproportionately larger JD/MBA population than the rest of the T14 is because of the very profile Northwestern tends to attract. They give out a lot of scholarship money to folks with decent work experience, and NU law is very biglaw-or-bust, so it often makes sense to spend an extra year in school for the Kellogg MBA.
In short, there should be no K-MBA students. The MBA is a professional development you want to undertake as you move up/around in your career. The JD is a licensing mechanism that allows you to practice law.
People need to stop thinking of JD/MBAs as "super JDs" and start thinking of them as two different degrees. They make sense for a very small niche group of people that are in a very specific circumstance. For most people asking, "SO JD/MBA AT GULC YOU GUIEZ?" it doesn't.
The general rhetoric is that a JD/MBA creates a "noticeable" boost in hiring, and is definitely not worth 90k+ and a year of school. However, that's kind of limiting. If I was looking at a full ride at Penn + sticker MBA versus HLS/HBS with close to sticker at both, I would absolutely do Penn. Frankly, even if it was half scholarship, I'd probably go with Penn.
The schools where you can justify doing a JD/MBA are Harvard, Stanford, Penn, Chicago, Northwestern, Berkeley, and Columbia. Maybe UCLA or Duke if you have ties to either area. On top of that, you can't just go, "Oh, I got into Chicago JD/MBA, so obviously I should do both." The profile of someone it makes sense for is someone who's been in the workforce for 4-5 years in a position an MBA would realistically help, AND that person receives substantial money at the law school/business school.
The reason why Northwestern has a disproportionately larger JD/MBA population than the rest of the T14 is because of the very profile Northwestern tends to attract. They give out a lot of scholarship money to folks with decent work experience, and NU law is very biglaw-or-bust, so it often makes sense to spend an extra year in school for the Kellogg MBA.
In short, there should be no K-MBA students. The MBA is a professional development you want to undertake as you move up/around in your career. The JD is a licensing mechanism that allows you to practice law.
People need to stop thinking of JD/MBAs as "super JDs" and start thinking of them as two different degrees. They make sense for a very small niche group of people that are in a very specific circumstance. For most people asking, "SO JD/MBA AT GULC YOU GUIEZ?" it doesn't.
- Cicero76
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
I retract my comment to +1 thistwentypercentmore wrote:Not quite so cut and dry.
The general rhetoric is that a JD/MBA creates a "noticeable" boost in hiring, and is definitely not worth 90k+ and a year of school. However, that's kind of limiting. If I was looking at a full ride at Penn + sticker MBA versus HLS/HBS with close to sticker at both, I would absolutely do Penn. Frankly, even if it was half scholarship, I'd probably go with Penn.
The schools where you can justify doing a JD/MBA are Harvard, Stanford, Penn, Chicago, Northwestern, Berkeley, and Columbia. Maybe UCLA or Duke if you have ties to either area. On top of that, you can't just go, "Oh, I got into Chicago JD/MBA, so obviously I should do both." The profile of someone it makes sense for is someone who's been in the workforce for 4-5 years in a position an MBA would realistically help, AND that person receives substantial money at the law school/business school.
The reason why Northwestern has a disproportionately larger JD/MBA population than the rest of the T14 is because of the very profile Northwestern tends to attract. They give out a lot of scholarship money to folks with decent work experience, and NU law is very biglaw-or-bust, so it often makes sense to spend an extra year in school for the Kellogg MBA.
In short, there should be no K-MBA students. The MBA is a professional development you want to undertake as you move up/around in your career. The JD is a licensing mechanism that allows you to practice law.
People need to stop thinking of JD/MBAs as "super JDs" and start thinking of them as two different degrees. They make sense for a very small niche group of people that are in a very specific circumstance. For most people asking, "SO JD/MBA AT GULC YOU GUIEZ?" it doesn't.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
It's rare that the perfect response comes within the first few posts, but, that is the best, most complete, answer possible.
The only thing to add (or tl/dr) is that one shouldn't do a JD/MBA for the sake of doing a JD/MBA. Only do a JD/MBA if it makes sense to do both (M&A comes to mind, but even that has caveats)
The only thing to add (or tl/dr) is that one shouldn't do a JD/MBA for the sake of doing a JD/MBA. Only do a JD/MBA if it makes sense to do both (M&A comes to mind, but even that has caveats)
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:43 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
If you want to do litigation, no.
If you want to go into corporate, possibly. See above post.
If you want to go into corporate, possibly. See above post.
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
I just want to add to twenty's post since I'm about to go through the JD/MBA application process.
Many schools have started 3 year programs (Stanford, Yale, Columbia, Penn, Northwestern, Cornell), but the tuition at most of them is about equal to that of the four year programs.
I also agree with the notion that an MBA is only worth it with significant work experience and relatable career goals. I feel like my career objectives strongly justify a JD/MBA and there's still a good chance that I'll only do one or the other because of the additional cost and time commitment.
Many schools have started 3 year programs (Stanford, Yale, Columbia, Penn, Northwestern, Cornell), but the tuition at most of them is about equal to that of the four year programs.
I also agree with the notion that an MBA is only worth it with significant work experience and relatable career goals. I feel like my career objectives strongly justify a JD/MBA and there's still a good chance that I'll only do one or the other because of the additional cost and time commitment.
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:43 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Taking business courses without getting an MBA is another option, depending on what you want to do. It's always helpful, if you're going corporate, to actually be able to read a balance sheet, etc., but that doesn't necessarily justify getting an MBA.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:20 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Here are the answers:
[*]if you're not going to a top school, it's never worth it.
[*]if you're going to a top school and want to be a lawyer, it's not worth it.
[*]if you're going to a top school and don't want to be a lawyer, it might be worth it
(re: being a lawyer, i'm referring to the immediate 0-3 yrs after law school)
[*]if you're not going to a top school, it's never worth it.
[*]if you're going to a top school and want to be a lawyer, it's not worth it.
[*]if you're going to a top school and don't want to be a lawyer, it might be worth it
(re: being a lawyer, i'm referring to the immediate 0-3 yrs after law school)
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:16 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Purely out of curiosity, any thoughts on Yale's 3 year JD/MBA program?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:20 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
i'd say a yale MBA doesn't even compare to a yale jdtirakon wrote:Purely out of curiosity, any thoughts on Yale's 3 year JD/MBA program?
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Yale's MBA is not worth the paper it's written ontirakon wrote:Purely out of curiosity, any thoughts on Yale's 3 year JD/MBA program?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Most people who say bad things about Yale's MBA tend to do so because of its awful US News ranking. In terms of admissions stats and job placement, it's really a pretty good MBA program, although nowhere even close to its Law School. In law school terms, it's like a back-end T14 IMO, but for how much MBA prestige matters, I would say that Penn, Northwestern, and Columbia have better JD/MBA programs for most prospective JD/MBAs unless they for some reason want to use the degree for academia or public interest or something (not recommended).guano wrote:Yale's MBA is not worth the paper it's written ontirakon wrote:Purely out of curiosity, any thoughts on Yale's 3 year JD/MBA program?
@GJWheeler, would you mind expanding on your post?
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
You missed Harvard.jingosaur wrote:Most people who say bad things about Yale's MBA tend to do so because of its awful US News ranking. In terms of admissions stats and job placement, it's really a pretty good MBA program, although nowhere even close to its Law School. In law school terms, it's like a back-end T14 IMO, but for how much MBA prestige matters, I would say that Penn, Northwestern, and Columbia have better JD/MBA programs for most prospective JD/MBAs unless they for some reason want to use the degree for academia or public interest or something (not recommended).guano wrote:Yale's MBA is not worth the paper it's written ontirakon wrote:Purely out of curiosity, any thoughts on Yale's 3 year JD/MBA program?
@GJWheeler, would you mind expanding on your post?
Yale's MBA is not bad, in the way that Alabama's JD isn't bad. It's just that a Yale MBA adds no value to a Yale JD, other than the intrinsic knowledge itself.
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
The nice thing about Yale's JD/MBA is the fact that tuition is only about 30k more. On the whole, that's pretty doable.
The downside to that is that the MBA becomes a very expensive paperweight if you're one of many Yale grads that ends up with a super-prestigious PI/govt. gig. Yale's LRAP does not cover joint degrees whatsoever, plus most of the top-PI jobs really couldn't care less about the MBA portion.
Also, like I mentioned before, the JD/MBA is not a "super JD", and the incredibly small advantage a JD/MBA grad from Yale might have over a JD grad is probably not even worth 30k.
EDIT> Apparently the SOM has some loan forgiveness program, too. Effing Yale.
Also, like I mentioned before, the JD/MBA is not a "super JD", and the incredibly small advantage a JD/MBA grad from Yale might have over a JD grad is probably not even worth 30k.
EDIT> Apparently the SOM has some loan forgiveness program, too. Effing Yale.

- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Yeah, also left out Stanford. It's implied that these 2 programs are better than Yale's JD/MBA.guano wrote:You missed Harvard.
I've also heard that there's a way to get a dual Yale JD and a Harvard MBA but I haven't looked into it.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
You do each separately and live halfway between the two schools (they're only about two hours apart)jingosaur wrote:Yeah, also left out Stanford. It's implied that these 2 programs are better than Yale's JD/MBA.guano wrote:You missed Harvard.
I've also heard that there's a way to get a dual Yale JD and a Harvard MBA but I haven't looked into it.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:16 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Is that sarcasm?guano wrote:You do each separately and live halfway between the two schools (they're only about two hours apart)jingosaur wrote:Yeah, also left out Stanford. It's implied that these 2 programs are better than Yale's JD/MBA.guano wrote:You missed Harvard.
I've also heard that there's a way to get a dual Yale JD and a Harvard MBA but I haven't looked into it.
I know someone who is doing a Yale JD / Stanford MBA in 4 years. So, presumably such combinations are possible.
- unc0mm0n1
- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:06 pm
Re: TLS Consensus of JD/MBA
Yeah a friend is doing a Yale JD and a Princeton MPA in 4 years. They reside one year at Princeton and three years at Yale.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login