The scambloggers are right. Forum
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:14 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Posted Feb 1, 2011 2:40 AM CST
was this article written from a time machine?
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
lulzColomboHeat wrote:Posted Feb 1, 2011 2:40 AM CST
was this article written from a time machine?
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
If you can't get into a t18 school you better be going for free.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Feeling generous today are we?Desert Fox wrote:If you can't get into a t18 school you better be going for free.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:32 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I would say HYS instead. And, even HYS people are struggling.Desert Fox wrote:If you can't get into a t18 school you better be going for free.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
UCLA, USC, and Vandy are iffy but are within the realm of "not totally fucked."bk187 wrote:Feeling generous today are we?Desert Fox wrote:If you can't get into a t18 school you better be going for free.
Depends on the level of risk one is willing to take. Bottom t14 has decent odds of getting you big law, fed gov, or something worthwhile.NoJob wrote:
I would say HYS instead. And, even HYS people are struggling.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
wow, groundbreaking insight. This sure hasn't been said before.
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:32 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Their message is getting validation.dresden doll wrote:wow, groundbreaking insight. This sure hasn't been said before.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Well, no kidding. Not that I needed ABA to confirm anything for me - I go to a T6 and have classmates without jobs.NoJob wrote:Their message is getting validation.dresden doll wrote:wow, groundbreaking insight. This sure hasn't been said before.
My point is that you're not telling us anything new. Anyone with half a brain has known that economy has gone down the drain for a little while now.
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:32 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I think you are missing the point. It is not the economy. The legal services industry is and has been in a state of contraction since before the recession. And, things will only get worse with more and more legal outsourcing.dresden doll wrote:Well, no kidding. Not that I needed ABA to confirm anything for me - I go to a T6 and have classmates without jobs.NoJob wrote:Their message is getting validation.dresden doll wrote:wow, groundbreaking insight. This sure hasn't been said before.
My point is that you're not telling us anything new. Anyone with half a brain has known that economy has gone down the drain for a little while now.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
The big firms were doing their all time best in 2007. Shit law has always(well a long time at least) been shit law and shall always be.NoJob wrote: I think you are missing the point. It is not the economy. The legal services industry is and has been in a state of contraction since before the recession. And, things will only get worse with more and more legal outsourcing.
- Marionberry
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:24 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
So, you're saying that the shitlaw market is gonna be okay? DWIdefensesecure?Desert Fox wrote:The big firms were doing their all time best in 2007. Shit law has always(well a long time at least) been shit law and shall always be.NoJob wrote: I think you are missing the point. It is not the economy. The legal services industry is and has been in a state of contraction since before the recession. And, things will only get worse with more and more legal outsourcing.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Yea bro, take out 200K at Tulane, it'll practically pay itself off.Marionberry wrote:So, you're saying that the shitlaw market is gonna be okay? DWIdefensesecure?Desert Fox wrote:The big firms were doing their all time best in 2007. Shit law has always(well a long time at least) been shit law and shall always be.NoJob wrote: I think you are missing the point. It is not the economy. The legal services industry is and has been in a state of contraction since before the recession. And, things will only get worse with more and more legal outsourcing.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
The bolded is retarded.WinterIsComing wrote:These topics are a joke The fear mongering that the bloggers foment would help if people like the OP and other "OMG no jobz!" people took the message to heart, and instead of posting here, they made the wise decision--to not attend law school.
The bottom 60% of students at every law school, maybe deeper in lower tier schools, do not merit jobs. They went to law school out of confusion or under the false belief that a degree means you get a job or, worse, they thought they could hack it but couldn't. A degree does NOT mean a job, and that is true in every single field. If you averaged the incoming class size for law schools, I'm guessing it hits around 215 or so people for each of over 100 institutions. Not accounting for dropouts and those who wise up in the process or experience some self-discovery, that is around 21,500 potential, incoming lawyers. The job market supply for that number does not exist on a yearly basis. Demand exceeds supply here. Therefore, the obvious result produces a large portion of people out their complaining. The vituperative remarks of self-entitled prats do not deserve publicity for any other means than to dissuade those ignorant enough not to research law school or who believe a degree demands reward.
Though, I wonder how the retirement of Baby Boomers will affect this number, but it is hard to gauge considering there are successful 80 year old lawyers. Whole different stream of thought there.
It's sad these posts keep appearing.
- Marionberry
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:24 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
story broWinterIsComing wrote:These topics are a joke The fear mongering that the bloggers foment would help if people like the OP and other "OMG no jobz!" people took the message to heart, and instead of posting here, they made the wise decision--to not attend law school.
The bottom 60% of students at every law school, maybe deeper in lower tier schools, do not merit jobs. They went to law school out of confusion or under the false belief that a degree means you get a job or, worse, they thought they could hack it but couldn't. A degree does NOT mean a job, and that is true in every single field. If you averaged the incoming class size for law schools, I'm guessing it hits around 215 or so people for each of over 100 institutions. Not accounting for dropouts and those who wise up in the process or experience some self-discovery, that is around 21,500 potential, incoming lawyers. The job market supply for that number does not exist on a yearly basis. Demand exceeds supply here. Therefore, the obvious result produces a large portion of people out their complaining. The vituperative remarks of self-entitled prats do not deserve publicity for any other means than to dissuade those ignorant enough not to research law school or who believe a degree demands reward.
Though, I wonder how the retirement of Baby Boomers will affect this number, but it is hard to gauge considering there are successful 80 year old lawyers. Whole different stream of thought there.
It's sad these posts keep appearing.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
You've become so much more optimistic/congenial (relatively speaking) now that you've got decent grades under your belt.Desert Fox wrote:UCLA, USC, and Vandy are iffy but are within the realm of "not totally fucked."bk187 wrote:Feeling generous today are we?Desert Fox wrote:If you can't get into a t18 school you better be going for free.
Depends on the level of risk one is willing to take. Bottom t14 has decent odds of getting you big law, fed gov, or something worthwhile.NoJob wrote:
I would say HYS instead. And, even HYS people are struggling.

-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AreJay711
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Assuming most of the rest are above that range, this is actually better than I thought.34 percent of starting salaries ranged between $40,000 and $65,000
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Not really. Probably less than a third of people at NU get perma fucked by law school. It's probably more like 50% at UCLA. Though maybe I'm overestimating how good UCLA has been doing.Bildungsroman wrote:
You've become so much more optimistic/congenial (relatively speaking) now that you've got decent grades under your belt.
In fact since grades I feel like it's probably more risky. I've seen some smart people who absolutely fucking gunned 1L end up well below median. It's a crap shoot. Not that it's arbitrary, just that it involves some sort of natural talent, and studying right for how you work bets. Neither can be known for 1L.
I certainly wouldn't go to a law school that you wouldn't be comfortable being at the bottom third mark at.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I mean the other way. Plenty of smart, hard working people end up below median. A lot of them will make better lawyers than people in the top half. Law exams are a peculiar way to judge people.WinterIsComing wrote:I was trying to be generous.Desert Fox wrote:The bolded is retarded.WinterIsComing wrote:These topics are a joke The fear mongering that the bloggers foment would help if people like the OP and other "OMG no jobz!" people took the message to heart, and instead of posting here, they made the wise decision--to not attend law school.
The bottom 60% of students at every law school, maybe deeper in lower tier schools, do not merit jobs. They went to law school out of confusion or under the false belief that a degree means you get a job or, worse, they thought they could hack it but couldn't. A degree does NOT mean a job, and that is true in every single field. If you averaged the incoming class size for law schools, I'm guessing it hits around 215 or so people for each of over 100 institutions. Not accounting for dropouts and those who wise up in the process or experience some self-discovery, that is around 21,500 potential, incoming lawyers. The job market supply for that number does not exist on a yearly basis. Demand exceeds supply here. Therefore, the obvious result produces a large portion of people out their complaining. The vituperative remarks of self-entitled prats do not deserve publicity for any other means than to dissuade those ignorant enough not to research law school or who believe a degree demands reward.
Though, I wonder how the retirement of Baby Boomers will affect this number, but it is hard to gauge considering there are successful 80 year old lawyers. Whole different stream of thought there.
It's sad these posts keep appearing.
- prezidentv8
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
THANK YOUdresden doll wrote:Well, no kidding. Not that I needed ABA to confirm anything for me - I go to a T6 and have classmates without jobs.NoJob wrote:Their message is getting validation.dresden doll wrote:wow, groundbreaking insight. This sure hasn't been said before.
My point is that you're not telling us anything new. Anyone with half a brain has known that economy has gone down the drain for a little while now.
- Nicholasnickynic
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Lol hes clearly in the top 40% rofl...Desert Fox wrote:The bolded is retarded.WinterIsComing wrote:These topics are a joke The fear mongering that the bloggers foment would help if people like the OP and other "OMG no jobz!" people took the message to heart, and instead of posting here, they made the wise decision--to not attend law school.
The bottom 60% of students at every law school, maybe deeper in lower tier schools, do not merit jobs. They went to law school out of confusion or under the false belief that a degree means you get a job or, worse, they thought they could hack it but couldn't. A degree does NOT mean a job, and that is true in every single field. If you averaged the incoming class size for law schools, I'm guessing it hits around 215 or so people for each of over 100 institutions. Not accounting for dropouts and those who wise up in the process or experience some self-discovery, that is around 21,500 potential, incoming lawyers. The job market supply for that number does not exist on a yearly basis. Demand exceeds supply here. Therefore, the obvious result produces a large portion of people out their complaining. The vituperative remarks of self-entitled prats do not deserve publicity for any other means than to dissuade those ignorant enough not to research law school or who believe a degree demands reward.
Though, I wonder how the retirement of Baby Boomers will affect this number, but it is hard to gauge considering there are successful 80 year old lawyers. Whole different stream of thought there.
It's sad these posts keep appearing.
Edited to add:
not that theres anything wrong with that... its just the only justification I can see for his completely arbitrary #.
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I like this
and thisWinterIsComing wrote:out their complaining
in the same post.WinterIsComing wrote:vituperative
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login