hello,
before i say somethings, i'd like to give a mini bio about myself. please make sure you look at the disclaimer above

i go to a law school in the 60's. many of you i'm sure know who i am and know what law school i go to. that's fine and i don't care, i just am not going to literally post the school name because i do not know who reads this site and i would rather not have any potential criticisms i make be directed right at me.
typing this is almost like a dream to me. i remember telling myself before law school even started that i would make this thread. top law schools was extremely instrumental to me in my lsat/application process, and i could not be more thankful that i stumbled on this site at just the right time. special thanks to ken, he helps very many and not enough props goes out to the man.
since 4th grade i knew i wanted to go to law school and be a lawyer. it was always my dream as i guided my schooling towards the goal. i went to a big10 school (from the midwest) and graduated with a 3.8. school wasn't super easy but definitely did not challenge me to my core. i went to law school directly after undergrad in a very unfortunate time in our economy. even though i always knew i wanted to go, i knew my applications were going to be crowded by people who chose law school on a whim that scored better lsat's than me. i had to accept that.
i couldn't be happier with where i go to school. many people on here stress looking BEYOND rankings (gasp! i know that's a crazy thought for most TLS'ers), and they are SO incredibly right. i chose a school and a location that i believed would make me the happiest, TOGETHER. i made the right choice based on my own personal opinions. i knew a few 1L's that from day 1 were not happy with where the law school was located, but chose it because it was the "best ranked school" they got into. many found happiness here. but also many left, completely unsatisfied with where the law school was. my question to myself thinking about them always was, 'if you moved here with the attitude you had, then why would you force yourself to come here in the first place?' choosing a school ranked 60's in a desirable location to me, and taking a pass on a school in the 40's i did not like where it was located was what i thought a risky decision. it turned out to be the smartest choice i made (especially since the school dropped in rank). ranking drops happen, and i can attest that if i would have gone to my other choice, in its location and with its ranking drop...i don't know how crazy i might feel if i had chosen it solely for its rank. go to law school where you want to LIVE too, don't let rankings run your choice and your life.
i really do not think anyone can prepare you for law school. i received a ton of advice from 1L's just finishing, 2L/3L's, and even grads. no matter what advice and warnings they give you, it does not hit home like the month before finals. scary as it sounds, i really do not think anything anyone told me REALLY prepared me mentally for what i experienced this year. and essentially, that's a huge point of law school. everyone on this site will have you convinced that you should do work before law school. i think that is not a good idea for multiple reasons, but the most important being that every single professor you have it different. for instance, my contracts teacher was the most abstract man alive. every concept of contracts that i might have learned through a supplement pre-law school (offer, acceptance, consideration, etc.) would have absolutely not helped me for his class nor the exam. my civpro teacher? we literally did not do the FRCP. i know every prof is not going to be like mine, and i know many will be the standard law school prof, but many aren't.
law school is exhausting for more reasons than just the schooling itself. you know what else kind of sucked? seeing the same people every single day. i know that sounds odd, but once you're in your "section," you have ever class with the same kids. every day. all year. that seriously blows. do you think gunners gun less once every hates them? no they don't. judgments and opinions in law school start from day 1. if you want everyone to think you're a douche, then acting like a douche from the get-go is a great way to start the talk. law school is high school. you bone someone at the 1L welcome to law school social, all your cohorts are going to talk about it. the 2L/3L's are going to talk about it. "hey you'd hear sarah blew tom?" you think i'm kidding but i was shocked to find out how much law school students talk and gossip. i think a lot of it has to do with the fact of how close you all become, but a lot of it has to do with the people. everyone is looking for something other than school to talk about at many times, and if your sexual escapades can be that, expect everyone to talk about it. i would highly suggest making friends outside of law school, if possible. i did and it was great to feel like i could get away from all "that" whenever i wanted. don't get me wrong, i did really really like my section and the kids i went to school with, but after 5 days of classes, group study sessions, weekend hangouts, i really appreciated the breaks i got from them. they are like a family, and being a family comes with the same annoyances i know everyone has with their own families.
i knew law school was going to be hard but first semester i made a lot of mistakes i quickly learned from. i did terrible first semester, a 2.8. it really hurt. at my undergrad i was at the top of the top, but here i realized that the work ethic of my undergrad was NOT going to cut it for law school.
one of the biggest things i realized that helped me greatly was all law school professors seem to care about is what they care about. seriously. my first semester i wrote a lot of my exams on what i thought. then i learned, second semester i went into each exam knowing exactly what my prof cared about. certain topics they loved to discuss, their opinions, etc. magically i got a 3.6. coincidence? i doubt it. law professors want to make sure you learn the topic but you need to give them what they want. i knew my crimpro prof was huge on minority rights. so what did i do? i learned the material and whenever i could, interjected the importance of protecting minority rights. i magically got an A in the class? no magic.
another thing i learned about law school exams is the ability to think on the fly. many law schools (did not know this going in) are open book. i remember thinking how awesome that is, but it's a trap. study for open book exams like you would a close book exam. you are going to feel SO rushed taking a law school exam. you think time flies during the lsat? ha. the students that do well are the ones that can make arguments on their feet. they know the material yes, but they also know how to argue it clearly. law professors have to read hundreds of exams many. do they want to read your confusing, mumbling exam? no, and they'll grade you harshly for it. a friend of mine barely write anything, yet she pulls A's. it isn't about how much you write and how much you can show the professor what you know, but it's about actually ANSWERING their question (seriously) and doing it succinctly.
everyone takes a legal research and writing class. i had a friend tell me "on your first REAL assignment, your first real paper, you need to do amazing on. once the professor reads your first real paper he/she believes that's what kinda writer you are. get a C on the first one, you'll get a C in the class." (i say real assignment because like mine, some will make you do a line of briefs before the first closed/open memo, and this isn't what i'm talking about).
when my friend told me this, i didn't take it to heart enough. i regretted doing that. I got a B on my first real assignment. I got a B both freaking semesters, though he'd always tell me how much "better" my writing had gotten. i asked him million times for tips and help, which he gave. i improved greatly but that didn't matter. why you ask? because not only does the professor in his mind when spending 10 minutes reading your paper believe "ok, this is midrange's, he's a B kinda guy...(grades paper)...he gets a B", but the curve is set. it's hard to knock an A writer off their post. i did everything he told me i should do, yet he always saw me the same: a B writer. it's hard to jump ahead of B+/A writers because the professor will always believe, before reading, that's what kind of work he's going to read. additionally, as the class goes on they will also get better, making it even harder to jump them in a grade. take it from me, rock the first assignment like it's your freaking job. for many, your writing class will be 2 credits/pass fail, yet you will spend so much freaking time on that class. it sucks, but that's standard.
i'm out of thoughts for now, but i'll post anything more/answer any questions if you all would like. sorry for the length! just trying to be helpful (if possible)
-middy