In defense of gunning Forum
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
In defense of gunning
As someone who has worked a job paying just a tiny fraction of a big law salary, it seems downright stupid not to gun as hard as you can for a position that will pay someone (with no experience) a starting salary well > 100k. Are the people opposed to gunning just folks straight from UG who don't know the value of a dollar or is there something that I'm missing?
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:21 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
working as hard as you can and taking advantage of opportunity does not equal gunner.
- Tree
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 8:58 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
As a general rule, the people who work 80+ hours a week in law school will work 80+ hours per week after getting the JD
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: In defense of gunning
I think you're confused as to what "gunner" means. A "gunner" is not merely someone who works very hard to succeed in law school; everyone with half a brain (and no legacy connections to BigLaw) is doing that.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: In defense of gunning
Humming is spending all day in.the library and sucking up to profs (which doesn't help with blind grading but it can never hurt to have a prof in your corner) right?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MrSoOoFLy
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
Gunners are more know it alls and try to show up their classmates/professors.Veyron wrote:Humming is spending all day in.the library and sucking up to profs (which doesn't help with blind grading but it can never hurt to have a prof in your corner) right?
-
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:32 am
Re: In defense of gunning
.
Last edited by FeuerFrei on Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:12 am
Re: In defense of gunning
were you at GW preview day last week?FeuerFrei wrote:Gunner are the kids trying to show off answering questions in an admitted students day mock class. Douches.
-
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:32 am
Re: In defense of gunning
.
Last edited by FeuerFrei on Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- afghan007
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:15 pm
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:53 am
Re: In defense of gunning
FeuerFrei wrote:Not GW, but not too far off. I'm sure they're everywherepollaclc wrote:were you at GW preview day last week?FeuerFrei wrote:Gunner are the kids trying to show off answering questions in an admitted students day mock class. Douches.
Ha yes!! I was. Agreed.
Gunners are the ones who make statements disguised as questions in the flailing hope that someone will recognize their genius, which happens to be EXACTLY equivalent to that of every other student in the room. Also the ones who get really quiet after first semester grades come out.
- gwuorbust
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
most amazing thread ever!!TipTravHoot wrote:http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_ ... forum_id=2
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:57 am
Re: In defense of gunning
+180TipTravHoot wrote:http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_ ... forum_id=2
I spent like an hour lol'ing at that whole thread.
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Re: In defense of gunning
Gunners are the douches in class who think they know everything, fight with the professor, and are just plain annoying. May I say they are douches again and everyone looks at each other like WTF... nooooo!!!! when they decide to open their mouths/ raise their hand?! Ok.
People who work hard and are not know it alls, annoying, etc, are regular law students. Get it?
Even in undergrad I came into contact with one and I wanted to pay the professor to kick her out everyday. That is how annoying she was. She was more annoying than that douche who sniffles every five seconds when he could just blow his nose.
/Rant.
People who work hard and are not know it alls, annoying, etc, are regular law students. Get it?
Even in undergrad I came into contact with one and I wanted to pay the professor to kick her out everyday. That is how annoying she was. She was more annoying than that douche who sniffles every five seconds when he could just blow his nose.
/Rant.
-
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:30 am
Re: In defense of gunning
That is the single funniest thread I have ever read on the Internet.
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- legalease9
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
Lol I love this one!yeff wrote:afghan007 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpVtqbnRatU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UDEtsRoXUI
- doinmybest
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:59 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
There was a girl at my ASW that took 3 pages of notes during our mock class. The professor told a joke, and I leaned in and saw her write the joke down. I guess she's beefing up her comedy routine.FeuerFrei wrote:Gunner are the kids trying to show off answering questions in an admitted students day mock class. Douches.
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
In my experience, law school students afford unlimited respect to those whose accomplishments - even when won in direct, curved competition with their peers - are accepted with perfect modesty.
On the other hand, even the slightest whiff of ego (deserved or otherwise) is met with shaking heads and negative gossip.
A lot of it has to do with the fact that everyone starts at the same point and competes for the same things. The name of the game is doing it tactfully.
On the other hand, even the slightest whiff of ego (deserved or otherwise) is met with shaking heads and negative gossip.
A lot of it has to do with the fact that everyone starts at the same point and competes for the same things. The name of the game is doing it tactfully.
- SaintClarence27
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:48 am
Re: In defense of gunning
I was really hoping to find more about that awesomely ridiculous lit gunner.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
Haha very nice. I guess she was writing it down so she can recognize it next time and laugh louder than EVERYONE else.doinmybest wrote:There was a girl at my ASW that took 3 pages of notes during our mock class. The professor told a joke, and I leaned in and saw her write the joke down. I guess she's beefing up her comedy routine.FeuerFrei wrote:Gunner are the kids trying to show off answering questions in an admitted students day mock class. Douches.
- Jericwithers
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
Also, gunners are those who take pre-law-ish classes in UG and cite cases and speak latin (neither of which are in the scope of a Social Psychology and the Law class). Also sending in research to the professor about topics vaguely relevant to the class but the professor finds VERY interesting.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
Gunners are usually insecure kids who do not succeed and make the big bucks. Those jobs go to the kids who work hard and are secure enough with themselves not to constantly talk about how hard they work. HTH.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: In defense of gunning
This makes me incredibly sad and nervous. I love participating in class. It keeps me focused and interested in the material. I don't want everyone to hate me, but I also want to do well. I'm pretty sure everyone is going to call me a gunner. Is a gunner just an active participant or a jerk? But it kind of sounds like people are saying that active participants are jerks.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login