UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington Forum
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
.
Last edited by charlesjd on Mon Sep 30, 2013 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:59 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
Thanks appreciate it...
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
and villinova... what?!??!?!?! lolletsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:59 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
This chart is kind of funny. For instance, Rutgers-Camden and Seton Hall put more grads in clerkships than all of the Top 14 except for Yale.charlesjd wrote:and villinova... what?!??!?!?! lolletsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
Yeah.... that is weird. apparently upenn is the place to be.
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
Howard = HBCU. And located in D.C. And a respectable school.letsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
Yeah Howard is pretty obvious. Not only do they admit 1) some of the very brightest black students, but also 2) provide an ideal place for any law firm seeking recruit the very best black students. Howard is, to a much lesser extent, like BYU and Notre Dame in that they stand a chance of recruiting the very best students from a certain demographic.letsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
Last edited by danquayle on Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
I lol'd.danquayle wrote:Yeah Howard is pretty obvious. Not only do they admit 1) some of the very brightest black students, but also 2) provide an ideal place for any law firm seeking recruit the very best black students. Howard is, to a much lesser extent, like BYU and Notre Dame in that they stand a chance of recruiting the very best students from a certain demographic.letsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:56 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
the chart makes no distinction between clerking for a housing court judge and clerking for sotomayor, so it's not terribly useful in terms of real clerkship informationletsdoit1982 wrote:This chart is kind of funny. For instance, Rutgers-Camden and Seton Hall put more grads in clerkships than all of the Top 14 except for Yale.charlesjd wrote:and villinova... what?!??!?!?! lolletsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
I guess funny, but also true. I know plenty of Mormons and Catholics that passed up empirically better options to attend BYU and ND, respectively.patrickd139 wrote:I lol'd.danquayle wrote:Yeah Howard is pretty obvious. Not only do they admit 1) some of the very brightest black students, but also 2) provide an ideal place for any law firm seeking recruit the very best black students. Howard is, to a much lesser extent, like BYU and Notre Dame in that they stand a chance of recruiting the very best students from a certain demographic.letsdoit1982 wrote:How is Howard (right below IU) ranked so high?
Edit: To get back on topic. Illinois has always been a step ahead of IU in Chicago placement, and thats always bolstered its numbers. Outside of Chicago, I don't think there is really much of a difference. The interplay between these two schools will be interesting to watch in the future, as IU is on an upswing, and UIUC has to deal with that scandal. Both of been hit very hard by the recession and the cut back in hiring, so a lot is up in the air.
I still think Illinois is the clear option for Chicago placement, but I don't think its crazy to think IU will serve you better elsewhere.
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
I don't know how much, if any, validity that chart has any more. It uses data from 2005, and so much has changed since then. It's good to look at for a school's historic achievement, but I don't think its representative of current placement at all.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
I agree that this chart has limited use these days, hence the 'Start here' suggestion. I've heard you can pretty much cut the big law % in half for a more realistic assessment, with the more prestigious law students landing the high paying jobs deeper in their class.danquayle wrote:I don't know how much, if any, validity that chart has any more. It uses data from 2005, and so much has changed since then. It's good to look at for a school's historic achievement, but I don't think its representative of current placement at all.
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:59 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
patrickd139 wrote:I agree that this chart has limited use these days, hence the 'Start here' suggestion. I've heard you can pretty much cut the big law % in half for a more realistic assessment, with the more prestigious law students landing the high paying jobs deeper in their class.danquayle wrote:I don't know how much, if any, validity that chart has any more. It uses data from 2005, and so much has changed since then. It's good to look at for a school's historic achievement, but I don't think its representative of current placement at all.
The reason the chart is not very helpful is not because of how old it is, but because of how misleading it is - You can't say it's easier to get a biglaw job from a certain school simply becuase it places more people in biglaw. For example, I would bet that it's easier to get a biglaw job from Yale than just about every single school listed above it.
- Doritos
- Posts: 1214
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:24 pm
Re: UIUC vs. IU-Bloomington
I agree but that assessment stops at HYS I think. Those 3 schools place a ton into clerkships that is why their big law stats may not be as high but once you hit CCN and down biglaw is the brass ring for a much larger portion of the class and a lot more of the top students are hittin' up big firms for employment.letsdoit1982 wrote:patrickd139 wrote:I agree that this chart has limited use these days, hence the 'Start here' suggestion. I've heard you can pretty much cut the big law % in half for a more realistic assessment, with the more prestigious law students landing the high paying jobs deeper in their class.danquayle wrote:I don't know how much, if any, validity that chart has any more. It uses data from 2005, and so much has changed since then. It's good to look at for a school's historic achievement, but I don't think its representative of current placement at all.
The reason the chart is not very helpful is not because of how old it is, but because of how misleading it is - You can't say it's easier to get a biglaw job from a certain school simply becuase it places more people in biglaw. For example, I would bet that it's easier to get a biglaw job from Yale than just about every single school listed above it.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login