Any self-important jackass with a thesaurus can blow erudite-sounding ignorant overgeneralizations out of his ass.WinterIsComing wrote:These topics are a joke The fear mongering that the bloggers foment would help if people like the OP and other "OMG no jobz!" people took the message to heart, and instead of posting here, they made the wise decision--to not attend law school.
The bottom 60% of students at every law school, maybe deeper in lower tier schools, do not merit jobs. They went to law school out of confusion or under the false belief that a degree means you get a job or, worse, they thought they could hack it but couldn't. A degree does NOT mean a job, and that is true in every single field. If you averaged the incoming class size for law schools, I'm guessing it hits around 215 or so people for each of over 100 institutions. Not accounting for dropouts and those who wise up in the process or experience some self-discovery, that is around 21,500 potential, incoming lawyers. The job market supply for that number does not exist on a yearly basis. Demand exceeds supply here. Therefore, the obvious result produces a large portion of people out their complaining. The vituperative remarks of self-entitled prats do not deserve publicity for any other means than to dissuade those ignorant enough not to research law school or who believe a degree demands reward.
Though, I wonder how the retirement of Baby Boomers will affect this number, but it is hard to gauge considering there are successful 80 year old lawyers. Whole different stream of thought there.
It's sad these posts keep appearing.
The scambloggers are right. Forum
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
@WinterIsComing: I would blame the fact that you don't have a job on your poor social skills making you a horrible interviewer. Them's the breaks.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I read it. You typing indicates that you're probably a mouthbreather.WinterIsComing wrote:I'm guessing this is a tl;dr post.
Normal people have the ability to carry on normal conversations, an ability which you lack.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- traehekat
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Sure hope your actual personality doesn't reflect how you act on here, WinterIsComing. Pretty dumb shit to say, IMO.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I think he's a 0L. In which case he just massively fucking jinxed himself.
Also he was on a reality tv show which means he is trashy as fuck.
Also he was on a reality tv show which means he is trashy as fuck.
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Desert Fox wrote:In which case he just massively fucking jinxed himself.

so true.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Surely, there is middle ground between asserting that and claiming that 60 percent of students at any given LS do not deserve a job.WinterIsComing wrote:But are you defending that everyone who goes to law school deserves a job?
Also, I cannot think of a single classmate that doesn't 'deserve' a job. If there's anything I've been consistently impressed by in LS, it's my classmates' intelligence and drive. They are pretty much all highly competent people.
- traehekat
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
All of the above?WinterIsComing wrote:traehekat wrote:Sure hope your actual personality doesn't reflect how you act on here, WinterIsComing. Pretty dumb shit to say, IMO.
Which part?
Get to law school, meet your classmates, take some exams, and then think about what you said again.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
My perspective may be skewed by the caliber of the LS I attend, but I really disagree that it's entitled to hope that a JD leads to a job after you've booked a T6 acceptance, even if you don't wind up in the top third at the end of 1L.WinterIsComing wrote:My use of deserve a job is more in regard to a sense entitlement that because they completed their J.D they deserve a job. It's the fact that the numbers cannot support 60% of people from every law school. If 15,000 legal jobs are dropped in the course of a year or more, that's more or less equivalent to over half of the incoming freshmen for a given year at the top 100 institutions.dresden doll wrote:Surely, there is middle ground between asserting that and claiming that 60 percent of students at any given LS do not deserve a job.WinterIsComing wrote:But are you defending that everyone who goes to law school deserves a job?
Also, I cannot think of a single classmate that doesn't 'deserve' a job. If there's anything I've been consistently impressed by in LS, it's my classmates' intelligence and drive. They are pretty much all highly competent people.
Of course there aren't enough jobs to go around. However, the fact that legal market has gone down the drain does not necessitate the conclusion that a median HLS student doesn't 'deserve' a job. Perhaps you should pick better language.
- Unemployed
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
+1, seriously. That post is one of the most inept attempts at expressing a simple (and relatively benign) idea.dresden doll wrote:My perspective may be skewed by the caliber of the LS I attend, but I really disagree that it's entitled to hope that a JD leads to a job after you've booked a T6 acceptance, even if you don't wind up in the top third at the end of 1L.WinterIsComing wrote:My use of deserve a job is more in regard to a sense entitlement that because they completed their J.D they deserve a job. It's the fact that the numbers cannot support 60% of people from every law school. If 15,000 legal jobs are dropped in the course of a year or more, that's more or less equivalent to over half of the incoming freshmen for a given year at the top 100 institutions.dresden doll wrote:Surely, there is middle ground between asserting that and claiming that 60 percent of students at any given LS do not deserve a job.WinterIsComing wrote:But are you defending that everyone who goes to law school deserves a job?
Also, I cannot think of a single classmate that doesn't 'deserve' a job. If there's anything I've been consistently impressed by in LS, it's my classmates' intelligence and drive. They are pretty much all highly competent people.
Of course there aren't enough jobs to go around. However, the fact that legal market has gone down the drain does not necessitate the conclusion that a median HLS student doesn't 'deserve' a job. Perhaps you should pick better language.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
+1, seriously. That post is one of the most inept attempts at expressing a simple (and relatively benign) idea.[/quote]Unemployed wrote:My perspective may be skewed by the caliber of the LS I attend, but I really disagree that it's entitled to hope that a JD leads to a job after you've booked a T6 acceptance, even if you don't wind up in the top third at the end of 1L.dresden doll wrote:
My use of deserve a job is more in regard to a sense entitlement that because they completed their J.D they deserve a job. It's the fact that the numbers cannot support 60% of people from every law school. If 15,000 legal jobs are dropped in the course of a year or more, that's more or less equivalent to over half of the incoming freshmen for a given year at the top 100 institutions.
Of course there aren't enough jobs to go around. However, the fact that legal market has gone down the drain does not necessitate the conclusion that a median HLS student doesn't 'deserve' a job. Perhaps you should pick better language.
Ugh, that reminds me I never responded to your pm. Sorry.

-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
.
Last edited by WinterIsComing on Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Unemployed
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
So how are you doing?dresden doll wrote:Ugh, that reminds me I never responded to your pm. Sorry.Unemployed wrote:+1, seriously. That post is one of the most inept attempts at expressing a simple (and relatively benign) idea.dresden doll wrote:
My perspective may be skewed by the caliber of the LS I attend, but I really disagree that it's entitled to hope that a JD leads to a job after you've booked a T6 acceptance, even if you don't wind up in the top third at the end of 1L.
Of course there aren't enough jobs to go around. However, the fact that legal market has gone down the drain does not necessitate the conclusion that a median HLS student doesn't 'deserve' a job. Perhaps you should pick better language.

- nealric
- Posts: 4384
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I'm a practicing attorney. I also think you have no idea what you are talking about.I am a 0L. I'm also a realist. If I don't do well in law school, comparatively, how can I leave it expecting a job? I can't. Talk to me in three years, haha, or maybe even after my cycle, and we'll see if I jinxed myself. Who knows. But are you defending that everyone who goes to law school deserves a job?
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I'll send you a pm when I'm off my iPhone so we don't derail the thread.Unemployed wrote:So how are you doing?dresden doll wrote:Ugh, that reminds me I never responded to your pm. Sorry.Unemployed wrote:
+1, seriously. That post is one of the most inept attempts at expressing a simple (and relatively benign) idea.
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
wat u doing on this website bronealric wrote:I'm a practicing attorney. I also think you have no idea what you are talking about.I am a 0L. I'm also a realist. If I don't do well in law school, comparatively, how can I leave it expecting a job? I can't. Talk to me in three years, haha, or maybe even after my cycle, and we'll see if I jinxed myself. Who knows. But are you defending that everyone who goes to law school deserves a job?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: The scambloggers are right.
You have no idea who merits a job and who doesn't. Entitled, unentitled, smart, stupid, etc. You made a sweeping statement about tens of thousands of individuals you have never met and know nothing about other than their class rank at graduation. Don't merit jobs? They either got one or they didn't. Each hiring committee decides whether they think that individual merits that particular job or not. You have no idea if they really did.WinterIsComing wrote:I admit it comes off harsh, but the numbers tell the truth. By "do not merit jobs," I refer to several reasons that do not strictly address intelligence, the self-entitled notion that they deserve a job simply because they received a degree as later mentioned tends to be the main one.androstan wrote: Any self-important jackass with a thesaurus can blow erudite-sounding ignorant overgeneralizations out of his ass.
I take that back, I misunderstood you to be saying that the demand for legal services outstripped their supply.WinterIsComing wrote: I am, however, confused as to why you think the demand for legal jobs exceeding the supply of legal jobs is that an over generalization.
- 98234872348
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
ITT: a 0L argues with 1Ls, 2Ls, and graduates about how easy it is to do well in law school, and how if you can't do well you don't "deserve" a job... GTFO.
- 98234872348
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
Sup rayiner.Desert Fox wrote:Yea bro, take out 200K at Tulane, it'll practically pay itself off.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: The scambloggers are right.
I know rayiner IRL he's a cool dude.mistergoft wrote:Sup rayiner.Desert Fox wrote:Yea bro, take out 200K at Tulane, it'll practically pay itself off.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login