(Please Ask Questions and Answer Questions)
-
flcath

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Post
by flcath » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:34 pm
lisjjen wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
Where does this keep coming from? It's like TLS users keep finding increasingly elitist definitions to describe the world. The term is T14. It means the Top 14. If you can count, then you can tell that Texas is now in the top 14.
To be fair, since no one outside of the legal profession has heard of it anyway, we could easily impose a definition that couldn't be understood by non-lawyers.
And the WORSE solution is to refer to UT as a T14, not b/c they're worse than GULC (they aren't), but b/c it removes the one real advantage of the term: that you know exactly who's in it from year to year.
-
AreJay711

- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Post
by AreJay711 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:39 pm
flcath wrote:lisjjen wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
Where does this keep coming from? It's like TLS users keep finding increasingly elitist definitions to describe the world. The term is T14. It means the Top 14. If you can count, then you can tell that Texas is now in the top 14.
To be fair, since no one outside of the legal profession has heard of it anyway, we could easily impose a definition that couldn't be understood by non-lawyers.
And the WORSE solution is to refer to UT as a T14, not b/c they're worse than GULC (they aren't), but b/c it removes the one real advantage of the term: that you know exactly who's in it from year to year.
Also, Georgetown comes before Texas in alphabetically so Texas isn't in the "top 14" in the most literal sense. Just sayin'
-
whymeohgodno

- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Post
by whymeohgodno » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:47 pm
lisjjen wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
Where does this keep coming from? It's like TLS users keep finding increasingly elitist definitions to describe the world. The term is T14. It means the Top 14. If you can count, then you can tell that Texas is now in the top 14.
Comes from the fact that it's true. Also texas has been ranked #11 before so this isn't a big deal.
Just because the term is T14 it doesn't LITERALLY mean the TOP 14 ranked schools on USNWR. Herp Derp. You've never ran into terms that isn't the same as their literal meaning?
-
whymeohgodno

- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Post
by whymeohgodno » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:48 pm
AreJay711 wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
So if GULC fell to #18 (I know it probably won't happen) you would still consider it a t14? I think your post is an observation of the schools traditionally in the t14 rather than an essential part of the definition.
Yes.
-
DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Post
by DoubleChecks » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:50 pm
whymeohgodno wrote:AreJay711 wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
So if GULC fell to #18 (I know it probably won't happen) you would still consider it a t14? I think your post is an observation of the schools traditionally in the t14 rather than an essential part of the definition.
Yes.
lulwut? that would make no sense. If GULC fell to #18, I would never refer to it as a T14 school anymore. In fact, I don't think anyone on TLS (besides you) would. Heck, even T6 now does not include Berk (though I guess that never truly caught on in the first place for them lol).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
birdlaw117

- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:19 am
Post
by birdlaw117 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:52 pm
DoubleChecks wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:AreJay711 wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
So if GULC fell to #18 (I know it probably won't happen) you would still consider it a t14? I think your post is an observation of the schools traditionally in the t14 rather than an essential part of the definition.
Yes.
lulwut? that would make no sense. If GULC fell to #18, I would never refer to it as a T14 school anymore. In fact, I don't think anyone on TLS (besides you) would. Heck, even T6 now does not include Berk (though I guess that never truly caught on in the first place for them lol).
Kind of like how Texas being T14 probably won't catch on either?
-
whymeohgodno

- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Post
by whymeohgodno » Fri Mar 18, 2011 2:57 pm
DoubleChecks wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:AreJay711 wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:Na son you gotta break into T10 to be a T14. That's the definition of a T14. Schools that have been in the Top 10.
So if GULC fell to #18 (I know it probably won't happen) you would still consider it a t14? I think your post is an observation of the schools traditionally in the t14 rather than an essential part of the definition.
Yes.
lulwut? that would make no sense. If GULC fell to #18, I would never refer to it as a T14 school anymore. In fact, I don't think anyone on TLS (besides you) would. Heck, even T6 now does not include Berk (though I guess that never truly caught on in the first place for them lol).
It's T13 now anyways. T14 is just a way for GTOWN to remember how far they have fallen.
-
lisjjen

- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Post
by lisjjen » Fri Mar 18, 2011 3:47 pm
birdlaw117 wrote:Kind of like how Texas being T14 probably won't catch on either?
Jacques Derrida alert.
T14 is just another signifier. In time, it
could come to signify a grouping of schools including UT. Like I said earlier, they need to actually hold on to that spot for more than one year. I'm thinking 3-5. They also need to continue improving their statistics and programs.
-
Alex-Trof

- Posts: 525
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:42 am
Post
by Alex-Trof » Fri Mar 18, 2011 3:53 pm
Just checked T14 on Wikipedia. UT is already included LOL.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Post
by DoubleChecks » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:02 pm
birdlaw117 wrote:DoubleChecks wrote:
lulwut? that would make no sense. If GULC fell to #18, I would never refer to it as a T14 school anymore. In fact, I don't think anyone on TLS (besides you) would. Heck, even T6 now does not include Berk (though I guess that never truly caught on in the first place for them lol).
Kind of like how Texas being T14 probably won't catch on either?
possible. I'm not against the T13, though it doesnt have the same ring to it...
and maybe Berk would have caught on if...they stuck in the T6 for more years
-
birdlaw117

- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:19 am
Post
by birdlaw117 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:05 pm
DoubleChecks wrote:birdlaw117 wrote:DoubleChecks wrote:
lulwut? that would make no sense. If GULC fell to #18, I would never refer to it as a T14 school anymore. In fact, I don't think anyone on TLS (besides you) would. Heck, even T6 now does not include Berk (though I guess that never truly caught on in the first place for them lol).
Kind of like how Texas being T14 probably won't catch on either?
possible. I'm not against the T13, though it doesnt have the same ring to it...
and maybe Berk would have caught on if...they stuck in the T6 for more years
I don't really think the T14 has been broken quite yet. If Texas were to move ahead of GTown then yes. But if we are all crying for the end of the T14 this year and then GTown holds the 14 spot on its own next year... what do we do then? The best part about the T14 is that it is constant from year to year, and that hasn't been broken quite yet.
-
DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Post
by DoubleChecks » Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:20 pm
birdlaw117 wrote:DoubleChecks wrote:birdlaw117 wrote:DoubleChecks wrote:
lulwut? that would make no sense. If GULC fell to #18, I would never refer to it as a T14 school anymore. In fact, I don't think anyone on TLS (besides you) would. Heck, even T6 now does not include Berk (though I guess that never truly caught on in the first place for them lol).
Kind of like how Texas being T14 probably won't catch on either?
possible. I'm not against the T13, though it doesnt have the same ring to it...
and maybe Berk would have caught on if...they stuck in the T6 for more years
I don't really think the T14 has been broken quite yet. If Texas were to move ahead of GTown then yes. But if we are all crying for the end of the T14 this year and then GTown holds the 14 spot on its own next year... what do we do then? The best part about the T14 is that it is constant from year to year, and that hasn't been broken quite yet.
Yes, we will have to see what happens the next 3-5 yrs. Berk didn't hold onto T6 that long at all, so if UT does hold to T14 for that long...who knows what would we what! lol
-
flcath

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Post
by flcath » Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:51 pm
We should ask Ken DeLeon to give a definitive ruling on this. It's his term; he should decide.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
alexonfyre

- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:00 am
Post
by alexonfyre » Fri Mar 18, 2011 7:20 pm
I just hope that for the year that it is available, we can tell people "ED to Texas is the best way to crack T14"
-
flcath

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Post
by flcath » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:35 pm
alexonfyre wrote:I just hope that for the year that it is available, we can tell people "ED to Texas is the best way to crack T14"
GULC part-time is, was, and always will be the easiest way to crack the T14.
-
paulinaporizkova

- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Post
by paulinaporizkova » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:37 pm
lisjjen wrote:And T14 is as terrible of a reason to go to a school as ever. It's ambiguous. It's socially constructed. It doesn't overide the actual factors that you should make your decision on and it never did.
Somebody had to say it.
t10 is still a valid social construct
-
DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Post
by DoubleChecks » Sat Mar 19, 2011 12:47 pm
alexonfyre wrote:I just hope that for the year that it is available, we can tell people "ED to Texas is the best way to crack T14"
too bad UT doesnt have a real ED lol
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
dr123

- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Post
by dr123 » Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Haters gotta hate, mang. Let em do their jobs
-
Alex-Trof

- Posts: 525
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:42 am
Post
by Alex-Trof » Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:18 pm
I was just thinking about it. Texas cannot be t14 unless we kick GULC out. With Texas being in t14 we have 15 schools being top 14. It doesn't make sense. Either GULC or Texas must be out or we need to start calling it t15.
-
flcath

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Post
by flcath » Sat Mar 19, 2011 8:06 pm
Alex-Trof wrote:I was just thinking about it. Texas cannot be t14 unless we kick GULC out. With Texas being in t14 we have 15 schools being top 14. It doesn't make sense. Either GULC or Texas must be out or we need to start calling it t15.
This is an impressively deep analysis.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
Alex-Trof

- Posts: 525
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:42 am
Post
by Alex-Trof » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:12 pm
flcath wrote:Alex-Trof wrote:I was just thinking about it. Texas cannot be t14 unless we kick GULC out. With Texas being in t14 we have 15 schools being top 14. It doesn't make sense. Either GULC or Texas must be out or we need to start calling it t15.
This is an impressively deep analysis.
LOL. Simple yet elegant.
-
carboy67

- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 8:31 pm
Post
by carboy67 » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:17 pm
this thread must be the biggest waste of time ever.
-
flcath

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Post
by flcath » Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:25 pm
Alex-Trof wrote:flcath wrote:Alex-Trof wrote:I was just thinking about it. Texas cannot be t14 unless we kick GULC out. With Texas being in t14 we have 15 schools being top 14. It doesn't make sense. Either GULC or Texas must be out or we need to start calling it t15.
This is an impressively deep analysis.
LOL. Simple yet elegant.
Cardozo, J., could have turned this into a 15-page opinion, no problem.
-
Patriot1208

- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Post
by Patriot1208 » Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:32 pm
Tbf, t13 has been a thing for awhile
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login