(housing, friendships, future exams, all things 2018)
-
LoganCouture

- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm
Post
by LoganCouture » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:48 am
leslieknope wrote:it's less "maintaining dignity" and more "maintaining my current post-law school employment situation." if someone guaranteed me i could coast with no consequences i'd be in like vegas right now.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6#p9678826
if it makes you feel better it seems like people go from straight Hs to straight Ps and aren't in real danger of losing their offers. have fun in vegas!
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Post
by Hand » Wed Dec 07, 2016 9:09 am
I'm really hoping this TLS trope of "public interest employers don't care about grades!" is going to turn out out to be correct because this semester simply cannot end well for me
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:52 pm
So I just had an exam where I wasn't sure if it was the right class. The professor was the same, my classmates were the same, but WTF was on that exam? Obviously nothing that we had actually covered in class or was in any of the reading.
-
MurdockLLP

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 10:32 am
Post
by MurdockLLP » Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:40 pm
unsweetened wrote:So I just had an exam where I wasn't sure if it was the right class. The professor was the same, my classmates were the same, but WTF was on that exam? Obviously nothing that we had actually covered in class or was in any of the reading.
Is this a 2L thing? I felt the same way about my Bankruptcy exam on Monday.
Also, writing exams was so much easier when I didn't know how to Bluebook or cite properly.
-
Hikikomorist

- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Post
by Hikikomorist » Wed Dec 07, 2016 3:00 pm
MurdockLLP wrote:unsweetened wrote:So I just had an exam where I wasn't sure if it was the right class. The professor was the same, my classmates were the same, but WTF was on that exam? Obviously nothing that we had actually covered in class or was in any of the reading.
Is this a 2L thing? I felt the same way about my Bankruptcy exam on Monday.
Also, writing exams was so much easier when I didn't know how to Bluebook or cite properly.
Can you explain the second paragraph?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:08 pm
ROTFL @ BB. Depending on the professor, I just put all the relevant case names into parenthesis and rock out. Point for each case name.
Actually, I only know one professor who gives points for that, so YMMV.
-
MurdockLLP

- Posts: 192
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 10:32 am
Post
by MurdockLLP » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:31 pm
Hikikomorist wrote:MurdockLLP wrote:unsweetened wrote:So I just had an exam where I wasn't sure if it was the right class. The professor was the same, my classmates were the same, but WTF was on that exam? Obviously nothing that we had actually covered in class or was in any of the reading.
Is this a 2L thing? I felt the same way about my Bankruptcy exam on Monday.
Also, writing exams was so much easier when I didn't know how to Bluebook or cite properly.
Can you explain the second paragraph?
Bankruptcy is entirely based of the Code; my professor wanted use to cite the code for every statement of law. Example: The automatic stay does not affect criminal actions.
See 11 U.S.C. 362(b).
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:35 pm
MurdockLLP wrote:Hikikomorist wrote:MurdockLLP wrote:unsweetened wrote:So I just had an exam where I wasn't sure if it was the right class. The professor was the same, my classmates were the same, but WTF was on that exam? Obviously nothing that we had actually covered in class or was in any of the reading.
Is this a 2L thing? I felt the same way about my Bankruptcy exam on Monday.
Also, writing exams was so much easier when I didn't know how to Bluebook or cite properly.
Can you explain the second paragraph?
Bankruptcy is entirely based of the Code; my professor wanted use to cite the code for every statement of law. Example: The automatic stay does not affect criminal actions.
See 11 U.S.C. 362(b).
In that context, it makes more sense.
My tax crimes class (Title 26 and 18 mostly) was very code driven too, but I don't think the professor cares about BB format.
-
foregetaboutdre

- Posts: 399
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:16 am
Post
by foregetaboutdre » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:40 pm
MurdockLLP wrote:Hikikomorist wrote:MurdockLLP wrote:unsweetened wrote:So I just had an exam where I wasn't sure if it was the right class. The professor was the same, my classmates were the same, but WTF was on that exam? Obviously nothing that we had actually covered in class or was in any of the reading.
Is this a 2L thing? I felt the same way about my Bankruptcy exam on Monday.
Also, writing exams was so much easier when I didn't know how to Bluebook or cite properly.
Can you explain the second paragraph?
Bankruptcy is entirely based of the Code; my professor wanted use to cite the code for every statement of law. Example: The automatic stay does not affect criminal actions.
See 11 U.S.C. 362(b).
Lol, I had a take home for a class with a course pack of just assembled cases (in that area of law). It said to write it in the form of a memo, so I figured I'd cite statutes/cases. I began it trying to bluebook correctly, but then since the page numbers were all off I just began italicizing the case name and putting at course pack number. I even think I started to butcher the fed statute citations.... No f**ks given by my prof., and it looks like no one even did what I did. Long story short, my citing didn't matter.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:49 pm
I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
-
buckiguy_sucks

- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Post
by buckiguy_sucks » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:51 pm
unsweetened wrote:I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
not if you have typed notes and will be able to spot the issues
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:53 pm
buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
not if you have typed notes and will be able to spot the issues
I'm one of those prole handwriters.
-
buckiguy_sucks

- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Post
by buckiguy_sucks » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:16 pm
unsweetened wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
not if you have typed notes and will be able to spot the issues
I'm one of those prole handwriters.
can't command f handwritten notes pal you're boned
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:23 pm
buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
not if you have typed notes and will be able to spot the issues
I'm one of those prole handwriters.
can't command f handwritten notes pal you're boned
do you even tab bro?
-
buckiguy_sucks

- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Post
by buckiguy_sucks » Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:39 pm
unsweetened wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
not if you have typed notes and will be able to spot the issues
I'm one of those prole handwriters.
can't command f handwritten notes pal you're boned
do you even tab bro?
tabbing requires i read through my notes at some point
before the exam tho
-
RCSOB657

- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:50 am
Post
by RCSOB657 » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:11 pm
Well folks, we're halfway done.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:30 pm
buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:buckiguy_sucks wrote:unsweetened wrote:I haven't had a take home exam yet. I have one on Monday and it's limited to eight pages. That being said, I didn't even bother outlining. Fatal?
not if you have typed notes and will be able to spot the issues
I'm one of those prole handwriters.
can't command f handwritten notes pal you're boned
do you even tab bro?
tabbing requires i read through my notes at some point
before the exam tho
that's legitimate
-
zhenders

- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Post
by zhenders » Thu Dec 08, 2016 1:52 am
LoganCouture wrote:exams 1, me 0
Yerp.
I got beaten by Professional Responsibility today. Just imagine what Federal Jurisdiction is gonna do to me tomorrow

-
Minnietron

- Posts: 759
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:28 am
Post
by Minnietron » Thu Dec 08, 2016 7:35 pm
zhenders wrote:LoganCouture wrote:exams 1, me 0
Yerp.
I got beaten by Professional Responsibility today. Just imagine what Federal Jurisdiction is gonna do to me tomorrow

Can I join this group? My 8-hour Copyright take home simultaneously felt too long and too short. I'm pretty sure that means I lost.
Last edited by
Minnietron on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
zhenders

- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Post
by zhenders » Thu Dec 08, 2016 7:55 pm
I just got out of that fed courts exam, and I felt really good about it afterwords, which is really bad bc fed courts is like quantum physics: if you think you understand fed courts, you definitely don't understand fed courts.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
unsweetened

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:12 pm
Post
by unsweetened » Thu Dec 08, 2016 10:31 pm
zhenders wrote:I just got out of that fed courts exam, and I felt really good about it afterwords, which is really bad bc fed courts is like quantum physics: if you think you understand fed courts, you definitely don't understand fed courts.
Is that kind of like walking out of an exam thinking "Well that wasn't as shitty as I thought it would be..."?
-
zhenders

- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Post
by zhenders » Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:28 am
unsweetened wrote:zhenders wrote:I just got out of that fed courts exam, and I felt really good about it afterwords, which is really bad bc fed courts is like quantum physics: if you think you understand fed courts, you definitely don't understand fed courts.
Is that kind of like walking out of an exam thinking "Well that wasn't as shitty as I thought it would be..."?
I think so? Or possibly more like, the reason I don't want to talk to anybody about the exam is that there's a good chance I made up all of the issues I saw, and everyone else saw the real issues. Like, it is an actual possibility that I wrote 4000 words on issues that weren't there but I thought were there.
Fed Courts is some strange stuff.
-
Minnietron

- Posts: 759
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:28 am
Post
by Minnietron » Fri Dec 09, 2016 8:17 am
zhenders wrote:unsweetened wrote:zhenders wrote:I just got out of that fed courts exam, and I felt really good about it afterwords, which is really bad bc fed courts is like quantum physics: if you think you understand fed courts, you definitely don't understand fed courts.
Is that kind of like walking out of an exam thinking "Well that wasn't as shitty as I thought it would be..."?
I think so? Or possibly more like, the reason I don't want to talk to anybody about the exam is that there's a good chance I made up all of the issues I saw, and everyone else saw the real issues. Like, it is an actual possibility that I wrote 4000 words on issues that weren't there but I thought were there.
Fed Courts is some strange stuff.
Your description of Fed Courts piqued my interest. I found this
http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblaw ... ourts.html. I now understand your description and will only take this course if there are 100+ students in the class.
Last edited by
Minnietron on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
hangold

- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:25 am
Post
by hangold » Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:58 am
.
Last edited by
hangold on Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login