. Forum

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:39 pm

Look I'm all for equal rights but can't we just let the people with SCIENTIFICALLY bigger brains decide what's just and fair and equal? Men are inherently better lawyers because women's periods confuse their senses of JUSTICE. Plus I hear they attract bears

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:40 pm

IsThisForReal wrote:semi-seriously considering a rolly something. my back is killing me

I think this was an under appreciated weed joke?

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:13 pm

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:14 pm

andthenIwaslike · Post by **andthenIwaslike** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:40 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:Look I'm all for equal rights but can't we just let the people with SCIENTIFICALLY bigger brains decide what's just and fair and equal? Men are inherently better lawyers because women's periods confuse their senses of JUSTICE. Plus I hear they attract bears

femininity = constantly fighting off bears

IsThisForReal · Post by **IsThisForReal** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:46 pm

andthenIwaslike wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:Look I'm all for equal rights but can't we just let the people with SCIENTIFICALLY bigger brains decide what's just and fair and equal? Men are inherently better lawyers because women's periods confuse their senses of JUSTICE. Plus I hear they attract bears
femininity = constantly fighting off bears

so deep

03282016 · Post by **03282016** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:47 pm

leslieknope · Post by **leslieknope** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:52 pm

Wahrheit wrote:
Gray wrote:Minnie call in

I just went through torts past exam and model answers and holy fuck I'm going to fail.
Is torts at other schools also just "law and econ: the class" or is it different

Lol Mack Hambleton call-in. Torts here is... not that.

In other news, jesus christ is my open memo terrible.

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:53 pm

Wahrheit wrote:
Gray wrote:Minnie call in

I just went through torts past exam and model answers and holy fuck I'm going to fail.
Is torts at other schools also just "law and econ: the class" or is it different

lol ya mine was 100% law and econ

03282016 · Post by **03282016** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:56 pm

Big Red · Post by **Big Red** » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:57 pm

Brut wrote:
Wahrheit wrote:
Gray wrote:Minnie call in

I just went through torts past exam and model answers and holy fuck I'm going to fail.
Is torts at other schools also just "law and econ: the class" or is it different
lol ya mine was 100% law and econ

feel like for me it's 50/50 law and econ, and law and philosophy

could easily see how it could go the other way, would probably make more sense

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:01 am

Wahrheit wrote:
Brut wrote:
Wahrheit wrote:
Gray wrote:Minnie call in

I just went through torts past exam and model answers and holy fuck I'm going to fail.
Is torts at other schools also just "law and econ: the class" or is it different
lol ya mine was 100% law and econ
where did you go

and pls tell me more about this not-law-and-econ torts

nyu

and i don't understand ur Q??

03282016 · Post by **03282016** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:06 am

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:30 am

axel.foley · Post by **axel.foley** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:44 am

Gray wrote:so my exam has quotes from opinions. The question is like (a) what case is this from (b) what was it about (c) what was its influence and there were four of those and the time allocated was 45 minutes out of the 3 hours. The model answers are like a page for each quote.

I guess if you just like prepare for that in your outline it will be okay maybe but that wasn't in other past exams so who knows. F minus for gray probably.

??? This literally sounds like a high school exam

Gray · Post by **Gray** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:47 am

haus · Post by **haus** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:48 am

Gray wrote:F minus for gray probably.

Many years ago, when I was in my first class for my masters program, the professor spent some time talking about the requirements for the course, and it was obvious that several of us were pondering what the hell we had gotten ourselves into. The professor took this opportunity to tell us that "No one in the class is going to get an F", this seemed to catch nearly everyone's attention, lightening the mood considerably. . .

Then the professor followed up with, "here at [school X], failing grades are E's"

03282016 · Post by **03282016** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:50 am

stronitsing · Post by **stronitsing** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:57 am

Just want to pass on a tip: I got one of the top grades in contracts almost completely from studying the exams, and mostly the model answers, on berkeley's exam database. it was insanely helpful, more so than anything I got my hands on throughout law school.

Hikikomorist · Post by **Hikikomorist** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:09 am

Gray wrote:
axel.foley wrote:
Gray wrote:so my exam has quotes from opinions. The question is like (a) what case is this from (b) what was it about (c) what was its influence and there were four of those and the time allocated was 45 minutes out of the 3 hours. The model answers are like a page for each quote.

I guess if you just like prepare for that in your outline it will be okay maybe but that wasn't in other past exams so who knows. F minus for gray probably.
??? This literally sounds like a high school exam
yeah well it's part II of 3, part I was like what I'd describe as issue spotter multiple choice and part III is a 3 page fact pattern

I wish more of my exams had an MC component.

BVest · Post by **BVest** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:13 am

Hikkomorist wrote:I wish more of my exams had an MC component.

Pre-1L exam mentality. Not saying you can't feel this way after taking a MC law school exam, just that you're likely to change your tune.

Hikikomorist · Post by **Hikikomorist** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:15 am

BVest wrote:
Hikkomorist wrote:I wish more of my exams had an MC component.

Pre-1L exam mentality. Not saying you can't feel this way after taking a MC law school exam, just that you're likely to change your tune.

I just don't get how it can be worse than a traditional type-until-your-hands-bleed issue-spotter.

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:18 am

You will when you get a MC exam and all the answers seem equally right/wrong, and you can't say "b but..." or "c if..."

. Forum

.

[s][/s]

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

.

Register now to search topics and post comments!

.

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

[s][/s]

Register for access!

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

[s][/s]

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

[s][/s]

.

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Register now!

.

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

[s][/s]

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Re: You Can't Spell Lunatic Without 1L

Seriously? What are you waiting for?