I'm taking the attorney's exam this month and in talking to folks it looks like the bar examiners like to add a question directly on point with recent appellate decisions. For example, one of my colleagues took the exam right after Obergfell (sp?), and she got a gay marriage fam law question. I asked a crim lawyer buddy and he told me to look at the big DUI change, sure enough, that exact issue was on the last exam.
Does anybody have a resource that will point out some recent rulings (last 6 months) that I can look at to get an idea about some things we might be seeing soon? This is generally GA specific.
GA bar exam recent case law Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GA bar exam recent case law
GA passed a “personhood” bill recently that is being currently challenged in court. Could weave a con law question out of that.
-
matthew.adkins
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 4:43 pm
Re: GA bar exam recent case law
Update: None of the essays were fact patterns drawn from any recent cases I looked at so this was a dead end anyway. ON the bright side the essay topics weren't too bad. We'll see in May.Anonymous User wrote:GA passed a “personhood” bill recently that is being currently challenged in court. Could weave a con law question out of that.
