CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules? Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
hatcrime

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:39 pm

CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules?

Post by hatcrime » Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:45 pm

I'm studying for the CA bar attorney exam using "Essay Exam Writing for the California Bar Exam" and Barbri books. Both outlines discuss "majority" and "minority" rules and usually fail to state what the CA rule is. I find myself looking up the relevant law for CA online -- for example, what is the statutory period for adverse possession? When can you get a deficiency judgment in a foreclosure?

Am I missing something? Is there any point to learning the law in other states here?

Also when I took the NY exam in 2011 the CMR had a "NY Distinctions" section -- I can't seem to find that in these 2017 books.

I don't have much time to study (work/family obligations), and this is pretty distracting.

Thanks for any advice.

Cop2lawyerNYC

New
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:51 pm

Re: CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules?

Post by Cop2lawyerNYC » Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:37 am

NY is now UBE, with the NY distinctions being tested separately using a 50 question online exam.
In regard to majority/minority distinctions, I don't know why the prep companies stress them. They are such a waste of time; I studied them but I didn't use any of it--there's no time to go off and compare minority/majority or argue both sides.

User avatar
hatcrime

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:39 pm

Re: CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules?

Post by hatcrime » Fri Dec 21, 2018 6:27 pm

Thanks. That makes sense that they would remove the "Distinctions" from the NY CMR since it is UBE. Doesn't make much sense to remove it from a non-UBE CMR!

I get learning multiple rules for the MBE -- but not for a state exam. I assume they will want me to know the CA rule only. Which I have to Google, since it is not in these books!

Bingo_Bongo

Bronze
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:25 pm

Re: CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules?

Post by Bingo_Bongo » Fri Dec 21, 2018 7:06 pm

Examples and Explanations have some good books that specifically discuss California rules. I think you only need the CA rules for the essays, though, and nine times out of ten the California rules aren't any different than the rules for the MBE.

mimim8

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 9:35 pm

Re: CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules?

Post by mimim8 » Sun Dec 23, 2018 5:56 am

hatcrime wrote:I'm studying for the CA bar attorney exam using "Essay Exam Writing for the California Bar Exam" and Barbri books. Both outlines discuss "majority" and "minority" rules and usually fail to state what the CA rule is. I find myself looking up the relevant law for CA online -- for example, what is the statutory period for adverse possession? When can you get a deficiency judgment in a foreclosure?

Am I missing something? Is there any point to learning the law in other states here?

Also when I took the NY exam in 2011 the CMR had a "NY Distinctions" section -- I can't seem to find that in these 2017 books.

I don't have much time to study (work/family obligations), and this is pretty distracting.

Thanks for any advice.
You don’t answer CA law unless specifically told to do so. Otherwise, it’s MBE. For instance, you mention adverse possession as an example- they don’t test CA real property. Only MBE real property.

User avatar
hatcrime

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:39 pm

Re: CA Attorney Exam - why learn other state rules?

Post by hatcrime » Mon Dec 24, 2018 11:18 pm

mimim8 wrote: You don’t answer CA law unless specifically told to do so. Otherwise, it’s MBE. For instance, you mention adverse possession as an example- they don’t test CA real property. Only MBE real property.
Oh interesting, I had no idea. You'd think they would mention that on the CBX website... Seems counterintuitive (and artificial) although I can see why that would be a relief for MBE takers.

It would be reassuring to me if you recall your source for that.

Thanks, and Merry Christmas!

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”