barinthefuture wrote:Thanks again.
I checked Texas district...
If you’re wondering whether there’s an option for you to just take a bar exam, with absolutely no exposure to US practice (via apprenticeship) or an LLM,
it doesn’t exist. Even California doesn’t allow for the “remote option.”
In states where you don’t need law school, nor the LLM, you still need to be working under an attorney’s supervision. That automatically requires you to be based in that state. As you’re not Canadian nor Mexican, you also would need an H1B visa to work - the very visa our current President has targeted for elimination. Considering that he’s followed through on a lot of his threats, I wouldn’t count on its survival.
On top of that, unless you already have a job offer (which is a requirement for that visa), good luck trying to convince an attorney to hire you. An attorney’s not going to risk his/her license (since a boss is responsible for an employee’s actions while working) by hiring someone who’s had no experience with common law practice (it is very different from civil law practice). Even if the attorney would be willing to, the immigration requirements make it a non-starter. Even if that’s to be ignored, you’ll pay a heavy price. The H1B visa effectively gives the employer wide discretion, and you’re stuck where you’re at until he/she no longer needs you. If you don’t like it, you get deported - all your work was for nothing.
If you’re willing to go through all that trouble, you might as well get an LLM (or even a JD). You can get in on a student visa (which is much easier) if you want to move, or you can stay abroad until the you get the degree and take the exam. You at least get some exposure to American jurisprudence, and you won’t be stuck in one state. Many foreign-based attorneys take the LLM route because it’s much less time than the apprenticeship period. Some LLM programs don’t even require physical presence (done online).
The Federal courts leave it up to the individual districts as to who to admit. All of them require you to be licensed somewhere in the US; California just adds the additional requirement of being licensed in that state. The licensure requirements all go back to what I mentioned before - they all require either an a JD, LLM, or some physical presence via “reading” the law. Even where you are admitted pro hac vice (for that case), that’s for that one instance.
Finally, even if the “remote option” was available, as someone with no (American) law school (or LLM) degree, you’re basically at the same level as those attending unaccredited law schools. Their pass rates hover between 10-25 percent in California. Repeat takers consistently have lower pass rates. So it’s safe to presume that you likely wouldn’t pass even under that scenario.
Again, you need to figure out, where you want to practice and why. Even at that, you might as well get ready to come here or get an LLM (or a JD) before you take the bar exam. Those are your options.
(Your OP didn’t mentioned where you’re based, so I’m presuming you’re based in Europe. This also excludes practicing foreign law in the US, which of course doesn’t require a bar exam).
My $.02