Full Faith & Credit Clause Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
salad.law

New
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 3:17 pm

Full Faith & Credit Clause

Post by salad.law » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:36 pm

I know it applies from state court to state court.

But does it also apply to:

state to fed court
fed to state court
and fed to other fed courts?

Puffman1234

New
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:16 am

Re: Full Faith & Credit Clause

Post by Puffman1234 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:56 pm

I believe that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution applies only to state to state.

However, 28 U.S.C. 1738 basically codifies the FFC clause so that it applies to the federal courts.

As for whether state have to give FFC to federal decisions, I had the same question sometime in law school. I don't remember the specifics but I did look into it, and basically what it boils down to is that while no constitutional provision actually requires states to respect federal court decisions in the sense of FFC, all states do. If they didn't, the system would break. So, while it's not technically accurate to say the FFC clause applies to all courts in all configurations (fed-fed, fed-state, state-state, state-fed), I'd just treat it like it does because that's the actual result.

User avatar
Toubro

Bronze
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:18 pm

Re: Full Faith & Credit Clause

Post by Toubro » Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:56 am

Puffman1234 wrote:I believe that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution applies only to state to state.

However, 28 U.S.C. 1738 basically codifies the FFC clause so that it applies to the federal courts.

As for whether state have to give FFC to federal decisions, I had the same question sometime in law school. I don't remember the specifics but I did look into it, and basically what it boils down to is that while no constitutional provision actually requires states to respect federal court decisions in the sense of FFC, all states do. If they didn't, the system would break. So, while it's not technically accurate to say the FFC clause applies to all courts in all configurations (fed-fed, fed-state, state-state, state-fed), I'd just treat it like it does because that's the actual result.
I just looked this up in my old civ pro notes, and I have down that when a state court is assessing the effect to give a federal judgment, it would try to give the judgment the same preclusive effect it would have in the rendering court system. Applying the federal law of res judicata it would then have to give (effectively) full faith and credit to the federal judgment, because that's what another federal court would do.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”