I appreciate your concern, but being close to a hearing doesn't identify me. The State Bar is denying admission at a record levels. It's so bad they're hiring more judges and moral character investigators just to keep up. There are dozens of hearings every month for MC appeals alone.anon1245325 wrote:While I appreciate the often helpful information in this thread about how the process works, I had to register after reading it to flag one thing for you guys - you realize that it's highly likely that people at the California Bar read or have read this thread? It's a public forum and anyone can come here. Some people in here are posting information that would make them easily identifiable and are also posting sometimes in a tone that isn't what you'd expect of someone appearing before the State Bar in this context.InterAlia1961 wrote: The new system does not display correct information. Mine says I was denied and no appeal was filed. The appeal was filed months ago. We're almost to the hearing. It takes at least six months for the investigation to be complete.
This is public forum. Posting here is not the equivalent to appearing before the State Bar. Of course the tone is harsh at times. Why would you expect anything different? If you really want tone, Google "Go f*ck yourself state bar of California." It pulls up an intense article by one pissed-off applicant who can't seem to pass the exam. We all have our issues.
They may be perusing forums like these, but probably not on a regular basis. While they may be able to identify someone by piecing together details from posts on this forum, it's unlikely they'd go through the trouble. To prove it would require a subpoena to the forum's owners, and the state bar doesn't have that power. Their time would be better spent making sure their new system works correctly. Seriously.