Difference between Implied Equitable Servitudes v. Reciprocal Negative Servitudes Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
ok2bedifferent
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:30 pm
Difference between Implied Equitable Servitudes v. Reciprocal Negative Servitudes
Can someone please tell me whether there is a difference between implied equitable servitude and reciprocal negative servitudes? They all seem to apply the General Scheme Doctrine similarly, so I'm not sure whether there is an error in my notes. Thank you
-
whitecollar23
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:27 pm
Re: Difference between Implied Equitable Servitudes v. Reciprocal Negative Servitudes
If I were you, I wouldn't get bogged down in the details of the names of these concepts. I'm looking at my outlines and see different names. If you understand the concept behind reciprocal easements within common schemes (i.e., a group of lots that have implied servitudes), you're fine.ok2bedifferent wrote:Can someone please tell me whether there is a difference between implied equitable servitude and reciprocal negative servitudes? They all seem to apply the General Scheme Doctrine similarly, so I'm not sure whether there is an error in my notes. Thank you
