Q on Punitive Damages against local government Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
BrokenMouse

Silver
Posts: 1273
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Q on Punitive Damages against local government

Post by BrokenMouse » Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:32 pm

In California, are punitive damages available against state/county/local government agencies and their officers in their official capacity? The below is the appropriate statute but I've seen so many lawyers ask for punitive damages anyway. Some pro-tip would be appreciated.

818. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a public entity is
not liable for damages awarded under Section 3294 of the Civil Code
or other damages imposed primarily for the sake of example and by way
of punishing the defendant.

criminaltheory

Bronze
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:48 pm

Re: Q on Punitive Damages against local government

Post by criminaltheory » Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:41 pm

Unless waived, states & municipalities & entities are immune from punitive damage liability. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, 453 US 247 (1981)

BrokenMouse

Silver
Posts: 1273
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Q on Punitive Damages against local government

Post by BrokenMouse » Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:48 pm

criminaltheory wrote:Unless waived, states & municipalities & entities are immune from punitive damage liability. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, 453 US 247 (1981)
Wow I remember this case from 1L. How did I miss this. Thanks a lot!!

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”