Post
by LawGamer » Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:07 pm
I thought the MPTs were fine. Felt OK about the first one and pretty good about the second. Law school should have prepared you for the first MPT. As far as the second goes, while I actually think it was probably a better question in the sense of actually evaluating someone's capacity to be a lawyer, it's one of those things that your level of preparedness would be highly dependent on your coursework/prior practice. Not every school requires pre-trial as a course, and that's where you likely would have encountered demand letters.
If you'd something like that before, and understood the format enough to know you didn't need to write a dissertation, it was easy peasy. If you were just having to wing it in an unfamiliar format and were trying to cram in a ton of law with cites and everything, I think it would be pretty frustrating and I could easily see how time would have been a problem.
As far as the MEEs go, it was surprising to see 4/6 being essay only topics, as my bar prep course had not led to me believe that would happen. As far as content, the Secured Transactions and Evidence questions were exactly on point for what the bar prep course prepared me for. Con Law wasn't a topic covered by my courses' practice essays, but I still felt like I knew the material. The only one I felt was really off base was the PoA/Wills questions, since the bar prep materials I had gave us all of one tiny paragraph on it. Thankfully, I actually practice in that area in a different state from where I took the bar, so I dredged up enough law to answer. The downside is it was state-specific law, but it was at least enough to muddle through.
My main problem was I could definitely feel myself getting tired as the day went on. Pretty sure I was just writing gibberish by the time the final Family Law question came along.