Accomplice vs Conspirator Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- swtlilsoni
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:00 am
Accomplice vs Conspirator
What's the difference? How do you tell if a person is the former vs the latter
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:36 pm
Re: Accomplice vs Conspirator
Good question. You are scaring me, Swtlilsoniswtlilsoni wrote:What's the difference? How do you tell if a person is the former vs the latter

-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:36 pm
Re: Accomplice vs Conspirator
swtlilsoni wrote:What's the difference? How do you tell if a person is the former vs the latter
I guess in accomplice cases you have a principal and an accomplice that assists him, but in conspiracy you have 2 or more persons agreeing to commit a crime, and the latter is an inchoate crime?
Intent to assist the principal and intent that the principal commit the crime - accomplice liability
Intent to agree and intent to commit the crime - conspiracy
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:29 pm
Re: Accomplice vs Conspirator
Think of accomplice liability as a theory of guilt/way to extend criminal liability and conspiracy as an actual crime itself.
With accomplice liability, you are trying to find someone guilty of the crime who didn't necessarily do the physical act/actus reus required for that crime, but might have had an otherwise guilty mind/sufficient mens rea.
With accomplice liability, you are trying to find someone guilty of the crime who didn't necessarily do the physical act/actus reus required for that crime, but might have had an otherwise guilty mind/sufficient mens rea.
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 4:01 am
Re: Accomplice vs Conspirator
I think the way they want us to understand is like THE_U said.
Accomplice would be like B came to A's gun store and asked A for a gun in order to kill C. A would be an accomplice if he says "oh sure, here you go, I even give you a $50 discount in order to help you killing C". Basically, A is an accomplice because he aided and encouraged B to kill C.
Conspiracy would be like "Hey B, wanna rob that bank? " "oh sure, let's meet à 11PM, is is ok for you? " "yup".
Accomplice would be like B came to A's gun store and asked A for a gun in order to kill C. A would be an accomplice if he says "oh sure, here you go, I even give you a $50 discount in order to help you killing C". Basically, A is an accomplice because he aided and encouraged B to kill C.
Conspiracy would be like "Hey B, wanna rob that bank? " "oh sure, let's meet à 11PM, is is ok for you? " "yup".
- Gamecubesupreme
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:54 pm
Re: Accomplice vs Conspirator
Being an accomplice doesn't require agreement, while conspiracy does.
In order to be charged for conspiracy, you need to either explicitly or implicitly agree to commit the illegal act.
In order to be charged for conspiracy, you need to either explicitly or implicitly agree to commit the illegal act.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login