I should qualify my statement a little, the lecture notes are fine for the essays. They give you the broad picture and the big topics, and you're able to apply enough of the law in your essay to pass. My essay scores weren't a problem either.NY_Sea wrote:Maybe it's different in NY, but every. single. person. I know that took BARBRI and passed used the lecture notes exclusively and used the CMR sparingly... My sticking point on the exam was my MBE score and that came down to not reading the explanatory answers the first go around. I didn't know the pitfalls and patterns that the test uses. My essay scores were above average.crumpetsandtea wrote:DON'T PANIC GUYS. Everyone has a different method of studying, and as long as you're doing what works for you, it doesn't matter what works for everyone else.bball700 wrote:Lol ditto. I said fuck outloud when I read this. Although hard to believe as I scored 71 percentile on stimulated exam a month back and a 57/100 on refresher. I've been using short fill able outlines exclusively. Oh and fuck wills and trusts outline/teacher that Santa looking bitch can suck my dick.MrMustache wrote:If what you say is true, I'm fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckedMTBike wrote: Those videos? Waste of time. The "fillable outlines" that accompany the lectures? BIGGEST PILES OF SHIT EVER. If you use those as your primary source of information (like they tell you to do) you will fail.
I followed BarBri's stuff to a tee in July + did almost every single essay in the essay book. Didn't read CMR at all and relied entirely on lecture handouts. Stopped studying MBE questions 2 weeks before the test. Did no other external prep, not even flash cards. Wrote my own outlines and watched every single video and found them helpful.
Other people did exactly the opposite, and they passed too. Hell, I had a friend who literally didn't write any essays (just read through them the week before the exam) and hadn't even finished watching the lecture videos until 1.5 weeks before. He passed (but he's probably a genius and I don't recommend doing what he did). It's not about following X Y and Z steps, it's about figuring out how you learn best and doing what your brain needs to do in order to learn the material. Other people will invariably do it differently. That doesn't mean your way is wrong.
I think the lecture notes, at least for NY, hit the big topics that are likely to be tested in NY.
But the MBE doesn't test the "big topics." The majority of the test seemed to test exceptions to exceptions, and the lecture outlines don't go into that much depth. And in a 50% MBE jurisdiction, this can be problematic.
This is a pretty common complaint I've heard from Barbri users, so I'm definitely not alone. But it is all about each person and how they study for sure, so ultimately do what works for you.