My agency lecture stressed that an agency relationship requires assent (including capacity to ascend), benefit and control.
The mini outline says an agency relationship requires capacity, consent and a writing if required by statute of frauds. Significantly, the outline has no mention of benefit or control.
I don't think this is a difference of state law. The lecture was supposedly specific to my state.
I guess my question is, WTF?
Significant Difference Between Barbri Outline and Lecture Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
-
myrtlewinston
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:39 pm
Re: Significant Difference Between Barbri Outline and Lecture
For what it's worth, I took Agency in school. My Prof emphasises benefit and control.
