taking two bars?? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:13 pm
taking two bars??
Anyone considering taking two bar exams at the same time?? How hard is it to take a 2nd bar exam a few years later?
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:56 pm
Re: taking two bars??
What states you want is probably a big part of this question, as there's only a handful you can combine in one sitting.
How easy it is to take a second bar exam later kind of also depends of what job you have and how much time you'll be able to devote to studying.
How easy it is to take a second bar exam later kind of also depends of what job you have and how much time you'll be able to devote to studying.
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:27 pm
Re: taking two bars??
.
Last edited by underthirty on Sat May 30, 2015 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
Bar exams are competency tests. It's not hard to take two or more exams even if separated by a few years. As a side note, once you practice for 5 or more years in one jurisdiction, many other jurisdictions offer an abbreviated bar exam for attorneys. And, of course, in UBE (Uniform Bar Exam) jurisdictions, one sits for 13 different state bars at the same time.
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:56 pm
Re: taking two bars??
It's not 100% accurate that when you take UBE you sit for all jurisdictions at the same time. (I think it's 14 now?) These states all use the SAME exam, there is no state-specific law on it. All UBE jurisdictions I know only let you apply in one state at a time and take the exam in that state. Once you pass you can usually apply to waive in to other UBE states, however different states do have different passing scores, and certain time requirements. You need to look specifically at each state's requirements because every state is different.CanadianWolf wrote:Bar exams are competency tests. It's not hard to take two or more exams even if separated by a few years. As a side note, once you practice for 5 or more years in one jurisdiction, many other jurisdictions offer an abbreviated bar exam for attorneys. And, of course, in UBE (Uniform Bar Exam) jurisdictions, one sits for 13 different state bars at the same time.
(E.g., I took CO in July 2013 and passed. I don't remember my score, but CO requires a 276 and WY requires a 270, so apparently I have a high enough score to transfer. WY will let me apply to transfer my July 2013 UBE score as long as I have a passing UBE and MPRE score within the three years preceding application. You still have to pay and go through that state's C&F, etc. If I let three years go by, Wyoming doesn't take applications on motion (experienced attorneys who don't need to test) until 5 years (I need practice in good standing for five of the last seven years). So 0-3 years = UBE transfer, 5+ years = motion, and if you fall into the no man's land of 3-5 years = you have to take the bar exam again.)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: taking two bars??
I had a brief thought of taking both OR and WA this summer, but obviously realized right away that they're on the same day. If it gets close to the February WA bar application deadline and I still don't have a job, I might consider signing up for WA.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
Whether the UBE now covers 13 or 14 jurisdictions, one is sitting for that many bar exams at the same time. The individual states have their own score requirements, score "transfer" fees & bar dues, MPRE requirement, C&F certification & length of time for which the test score is valid.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
@Dudders: What do you mean by "waive into" their state bars ? It is NOT a waiver; it is a score transfer. When you sit for the UBE in one jurisdiction, you are essentially sitting for a bar exam score which is valid for all 13 or 14 UBE states within their stated score requirements & time limits (which vary from about 18 months--one may be only 12 months--to 5 years).
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
Dudders post above needs clarification.
It should be noted that Dudders example is only for Colorado & Wyoming. Also, Wyoming has an unusually restrictive MPRE test date requirement that requires a motion to that state's supreme court for an exemption if one fails to meet the Wyoming MPRE test time limits.
The period of between 3 & 5 years in his example has little relevance to a discussion of the UBE as any licensed attorney with at least 5 years experience & other requirements can apply for admission on motion (or by abbreviated attorney's exam in many jurisdictions)' Also, several UBE states allow consider the bar exam test score eligible for 5 years as a transfer score (Arizona, for example.)
It should be noted that Dudders example is only for Colorado & Wyoming. Also, Wyoming has an unusually restrictive MPRE test date requirement that requires a motion to that state's supreme court for an exemption if one fails to meet the Wyoming MPRE test time limits.
The period of between 3 & 5 years in his example has little relevance to a discussion of the UBE as any licensed attorney with at least 5 years experience & other requirements can apply for admission on motion (or by abbreviated attorney's exam in many jurisdictions)' Also, several UBE states allow consider the bar exam test score eligible for 5 years as a transfer score (Arizona, for example.)
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
The Uniform Bar Exam (UBE) covers 14 jurisdictions.
Alaska 280
Idaho 280
Colorado 276
Arizona 273
Montana 270
Nebraska 270
New Hampshire 270
Utah 270
Washington 270
Wyoming 270
Minnesota 260
Missouri 260
North Dakota 260
Alabama 256
Scores remain valid for anywhere from 18 months (Utah but for 5 years if in the full-time practice of law during that period) to 5 years (Arizona, Alaska & Nebraska) depending upon the particular jurisdiction & other circumstances.
Alaska 280
Idaho 280
Colorado 276
Arizona 273
Montana 270
Nebraska 270
New Hampshire 270
Utah 270
Washington 270
Wyoming 270
Minnesota 260
Missouri 260
North Dakota 260
Alabama 256
Scores remain valid for anywhere from 18 months (Utah but for 5 years if in the full-time practice of law during that period) to 5 years (Arizona, Alaska & Nebraska) depending upon the particular jurisdiction & other circumstances.
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
A couple of years ago, I did a score conversion chart for, if I recall correctly, 31 (of course, this doesn't include the current 14 UBE states) different US states (5 states have scoring systems that don't lend themselves to conversion). Delaware remains the most difficult bar exam, with California second.
NON-UBE jurisdictions:
Delaware converted to a 290.
California converted to a 288.
Oregon converted to a 284.'
Virginia converted to a 280.
North Carolina converted to a 276.8.
Maine converted to a 276.
Rhode Island converted to a 276.
Florida converted to a 272.
Pennsylvania converted to a 272.
Maryland converted to a 270.6.
Arkansas converted to a 270.
Georgia 270.
Massachusetts 270.
Michigan 270.
Ohio 270.
Oklahoma 270.
Tennessee 270.
Texas 270.
West Virginia 270.
Hawaii 268.
District of Columbia 266.
Iowa 266.
Kansas 266.
New Jersey 266.
New York 266.
Illinois 264.
Connecticutt 264.
Indiana 264.
Mississippi 264.
New Mexico 260.
South Dakota 260.
Wisconsin 258.
Guam 265.
NON-UBE jurisdictions:
Delaware converted to a 290.
California converted to a 288.
Oregon converted to a 284.'
Virginia converted to a 280.
North Carolina converted to a 276.8.
Maine converted to a 276.
Rhode Island converted to a 276.
Florida converted to a 272.
Pennsylvania converted to a 272.
Maryland converted to a 270.6.
Arkansas converted to a 270.
Georgia 270.
Massachusetts 270.
Michigan 270.
Ohio 270.
Oklahoma 270.
Tennessee 270.
Texas 270.
West Virginia 270.
Hawaii 268.
District of Columbia 266.
Iowa 266.
Kansas 266.
New Jersey 266.
New York 266.
Illinois 264.
Connecticutt 264.
Indiana 264.
Mississippi 264.
New Mexico 260.
South Dakota 260.
Wisconsin 258.
Guam 265.
Last edited by CanadianWolf on Mon May 04, 2015 1:42 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:01 pm
Re: taking two bars??
They're not "competency tests." That's what people who make money off of this hazing process want you to think. They're "how diversified was your coursework and how much memorization did you cram into the weeks before the exam(s)" tests.
I'll echo that MA/NY and NJ/NY are common combinations; CT/MA and CT/NJ are also done by some people . Of those, MA/NY would be the hardest because they both go beyond what you need to know for the MBE to a greater degree than the others. CT/NJ would be on the opposite end.
I would avoid taking two at once unless at least a couple of the following are true: You've done coursework in all of the tested subjects for both states, you're great at rote memorization and regurgitation, you don't get significant test anxiety, you already know from practice tests that you can kill the MBE, you will not have something like a job or moving preventing you from studying a few hundred hours in the relevant timeframe.
Oh, and you should also be able to restrain yourself from glaring at the well-meaning proctor who, at the end of state #1 day, incorrectly tells you that you're "halfway done
!"
I'll echo that MA/NY and NJ/NY are common combinations; CT/MA and CT/NJ are also done by some people . Of those, MA/NY would be the hardest because they both go beyond what you need to know for the MBE to a greater degree than the others. CT/NJ would be on the opposite end.
I would avoid taking two at once unless at least a couple of the following are true: You've done coursework in all of the tested subjects for both states, you're great at rote memorization and regurgitation, you don't get significant test anxiety, you already know from practice tests that you can kill the MBE, you will not have something like a job or moving preventing you from studying a few hundred hours in the relevant timeframe.
Oh, and you should also be able to restrain yourself from glaring at the well-meaning proctor who, at the end of state #1 day, incorrectly tells you that you're "halfway done

-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: taking two bars??
Stendhal: You have it backwards; bar prep profiteers want you to believe that bar exams are more than just mere "competency tests".
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:01 pm
Re: taking two bars??
CanadianWolf:
What NCBE et al want us to believe is that there is any construct validity to these tests whatsoever and that recent declines in pass rates have to do with us being idiots rather than other factors (law schools actually teaching lawyering skills, the Great Softest Debacle of July 2014, the lack of information provided before adoption of the Civ Pro portion of the MBE, the desire to decrease pass rates so as to increase revenue, etc).
What NCBE et al want us to believe is that there is any construct validity to these tests whatsoever and that recent declines in pass rates have to do with us being idiots rather than other factors (law schools actually teaching lawyering skills, the Great Softest Debacle of July 2014, the lack of information provided before adoption of the Civ Pro portion of the MBE, the desire to decrease pass rates so as to increase revenue, etc).
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:56 pm
Re: taking two bars??
dudders wrote:It's not 100% accurate that when you take UBE you sit for all jurisdictions at the same time. (I think it's 14 now?) These states all use the SAME exam, there is no state-specific law on it. All UBE jurisdictions I know only let you apply in one state at a time and take the exam in that state. Once you pass you can usually apply to waive in to other UBE states, however different states do have different passing scores, and certain time requirements. You need to look specifically at each state's requirements because every state is different.CanadianWolf wrote:Bar exams are competency tests. It's not hard to take two or more exams even if separated by a few years. As a side note, once you practice for 5 or more years in one jurisdiction, many other jurisdictions offer an abbreviated bar exam for attorneys. And, of course, in UBE (Uniform Bar Exam) jurisdictions, one sits for 13 different state bars at the same time.
(E.g., I took CO in July 2013 and passed. I don't remember my score, but CO requires a 276 and WY requires a 270, so apparently I have a high enough score to transfer. WY will let me apply to transfer my July 2013 UBE score as long as I have a passing UBE and MPRE score within the three years preceding application. You still have to pay and go through that state's C&F, etc. If I let three years go by, Wyoming doesn't take applications on motion (experienced attorneys who don't need to test) until 5 years (I need practice in good standing for five of the last seven years). So 0-3 years = UBE transfer, 5+ years = motion, and if you fall into the no man's land of 3-5 years = you have to take the bar exam again.)
Holy crap.
I think we're all just using the same words to describe the same thing. When I read "one sits for 13 different state bars at the same time," I thought OP (or others who haven't yet gone through the bar) would read that as: you can take the bar in all 13 states at once and get into all states at that time.
I always understood "waive" or "waiving" in as slang, more or less, basically mean you can get in without taking the bar again. I don't really see much of a difference between score transfer or on motion in terms of semantics.
I was just trying to clarify that, yes, it's the same bar EXAM, but you're not taking for more than one state simultaneously. I mean "waive" in generally to mean you can apply later to other states without taking the test again (provided you meet the requirements). Everyone in DC called calling "waiving in" because you can get into DC once you pass any state without the waiting period most other jurisdictions require. If people out there think the word "waive" is restricted only to experienced attorney on motion applications and I'm a complete moron, well, there's that.
And all I did was give a Wyoming/Colorado example to show that it's not "you take this test and you can get into 13/14 states right now if you want and forever if you want" - OP needs to look at specific states and requirements.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login