Question:
If someone shoots someone in the leg and then later on in the hospital they suffer a heart attack, will they be liable for the death of the victim? Also, what if the victim had cancer, someone shoots victim, they are in the hospital recovering from the gun shot wound, but severely sick and then die, would the defendant be the proximate cause of the death?
Crim Law- Proximate Causation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:48 am
Re: Crim Law- Proximate Causation
For murder, causation = but for cause of victim's death + proximate cause (which means the death must have been a natural and probable consequence of the defendant's conduct).
For the first hypo, I think you could make an argument that causation exists. But for the defendant's shooting, the victim wouldn't have been under severe stress so as to cause him to have a heart attack. And I think having a heart attack could be a natural and probable consequence of being shot.
For the second hypo, you'd probably need more info. Usually in those types of questions, they'll throw in some information about the actual cause of death, e.g., "the coroner concluded that the cause of death was the victim's cancer." If that's the case, then the shooting wasn't the but for cause of the death, unless there are facts indicating to the contrary.
Just my 2 cents. I may or may not be 100% correct.
For the first hypo, I think you could make an argument that causation exists. But for the defendant's shooting, the victim wouldn't have been under severe stress so as to cause him to have a heart attack. And I think having a heart attack could be a natural and probable consequence of being shot.
For the second hypo, you'd probably need more info. Usually in those types of questions, they'll throw in some information about the actual cause of death, e.g., "the coroner concluded that the cause of death was the victim's cancer." If that's the case, then the shooting wasn't the but for cause of the death, unless there are facts indicating to the contrary.
Just my 2 cents. I may or may not be 100% correct.
- Georgia Avenue
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:42 am
Re: Crim Law- Proximate Causation
Remember that accelerating death = causing death. If the guy had died of cancer but the doctor said he'd have died in six months instead of six days had he not been shot, the shooter is on the hook for murder.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Crim Law- Proximate Causation
This. I think this is what OP was alluding to.Georgia Avenue wrote:Remember that accelerating death = causing death. If the guy had died of cancer but the doctor said he'd have died in six months instead of six days had he not been shot, the shooter is on the hook for murder.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:00 pm
Re: Crim Law- Proximate Causation
Just did some problems earlier - D not the proximate cause of death when his act sends victim to the hospital and then there's an earthquake where the hospital is and vic dies awaiting treatment/recovering because it's an act of God.
I disagree because I feel like D made the vic end up in the hospital so he's the prox cause but whatever
I disagree because I feel like D made the vic end up in the hospital so he's the prox cause but whatever
- Georgia Avenue
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:42 am
Re: Crim Law- Proximate Causation
well not reallyLaw-So-Hard wrote:Just did some problems earlier - D not the proximate cause of death when his act sends victim to the hospital and then there's an earthquake where the hospital is and vic dies awaiting treatment/recovering because it's an act of God.
I disagree because I feel like D made the vic end up in the hospital so he's the prox cause but whatever
he's a but-for cause but an earthquake that kills the victim isn't really a foreseeable consequence of the criminal act
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login