Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
banjooooo

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:07 pm
Post
by banjooooo » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:46 am
peanut123 wrote:The Egyptian wrote:
I am still struggling with timing. If anybody have a useful tip, please share.
I'm not sure if you've posted about this earlier with things you've tried (so I'm sorry if this is redundant) but the SFE lecturer has this tip that she keeps going on about in each of the videos I've seen her do. She suggests using a piece of scratch paper and making two columns - one for "I kind of know and selected an answer, but I want to come back" and one for "I have no freaking idea/the question is too long/I skipped it."
Basically, as you're taking the test, if it's a really long fact pattern just by glancing, the call of the question sounds totally unfamiliar to you, etc., she says just bubble in a random choice and put it in your second column. Don't bother reading it or thinking about it. Then move forward. The idea is to just totally skip the ones that look ugly, and come back if you can (which you should be able to, she says).
Other than that, are you reading the call of the question first? That helps focus your reading of the facts, but you have to be careful not to let it trick you into making up your mind. I think the best thing is to just keep practicing. Aim for 17 in 30 mins if you don't want to do a bigger set and set a timer that'll give you a 5-minute warning.
I do a similar thing to what the SFE lecturer suggested, except with questions that I'm not sure about I make a mark by the number. I underline ones I'm iffy on and circle the ones that I have no clue about. It's quicker than making a checklist and is easy to reference back to. Instead of dwelling on a question I just guess, mark it, and move on. A lot of the time when I go back and check, it turns out my instinct was right anyway. Just make sure you mark lightly so you can erase it before time is called.
-
peanut123

- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 10:00 am
Post
by peanut123 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:10 am
banjooooo wrote:peanut123 wrote:The Egyptian wrote:
I am still struggling with timing. If anybody have a useful tip, please share.
I'm not sure if you've posted about this earlier with things you've tried (so I'm sorry if this is redundant) but the SFE lecturer has this tip that she keeps going on about in each of the videos I've seen her do. She suggests using a piece of scratch paper and making two columns - one for "I kind of know and selected an answer, but I want to come back" and one for "I have no freaking idea/the question is too long/I skipped it."
Basically, as you're taking the test, if it's a really long fact pattern just by glancing, the call of the question sounds totally unfamiliar to you, etc., she says just bubble in a random choice and put it in your second column. Don't bother reading it or thinking about it. Then move forward. The idea is to just totally skip the ones that look ugly, and come back if you can (which you should be able to, she says).
Other than that, are you reading the call of the question first? That helps focus your reading of the facts, but you have to be careful not to let it trick you into making up your mind. I think the best thing is to just keep practicing. Aim for 17 in 30 mins if you don't want to do a bigger set and set a timer that'll give you a 5-minute warning.
I do a similar thing to what the SFE lecturer suggested, except with questions that I'm not sure about I make a mark by the number. I underline ones I'm iffy on and circle the ones that I have no clue about. It's quicker than making a checklist and is easy to reference back to. Instead of dwelling on a question I just guess, mark it, and move on. A lot of the time when I go back and check, it turns out my instinct was right anyway. Just make sure you mark lightly so you can erase it before time is called.
Yeah I do that as well in my exam book. I think it works well but if I totally skip one and haven't read it at all, it might be helpful to have an extra reminder (on the scratch paper) that those are ultra high-priority to return to first.
-
alicrimson

- Posts: 923
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:27 pm
Post
by alicrimson » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:29 am
Is anyone using the mixed sets for review? I have done four, and they seem kinda silly. I mean, I read that the average for barbri testers was 67% and most of the averages on the mixed sets are 72%, but it just seems really really easy, and I don't want to be doing them if it won't be beneficial. Though, I would LOVE if they were representative of the difficulty of the MBE. Any thoughts?
Also, for timing, I like what that Rafael Guzman guy said. 17 every 30 minutes. I usually start doing this and then somehow wind up finishing around an hour early, but that is my plan in case emergencies happen on the test. That, and I plan on circling ones where I'm at WTF levels and starring ones that I'd like to come back to for a bit of review--I'm talking to you long property hypos where you have to think about whether RAP could apply.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Post
by jd20132013 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:25 am
i did one mixed set already. i may or may not do one today. if im going to do questions that are MBE dificulty I might rather just do them from the Emanuels book
-
pizzasodafries

- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:37 am
Post
by pizzasodafries » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:36 am
alicrimson wrote:Is anyone using the mixed sets for review? I have done four, and they seem kinda silly. I mean, I read that the average for barbri testers was 67% and most of the averages on the mixed sets are 72%, but it just seems really really easy, and I don't want to be doing them if it won't be beneficial. Though, I would LOVE if they were representative of the difficulty of the MBE. Any thoughts?
Also, for timing, I like what that Rafael Guzman guy said. 17 every 30 minutes. I usually start doing this and then somehow wind up finishing around an hour early, but that is my plan in case emergencies happen on the test. That, and I plan on circling ones where I'm at WTF levels and starring ones that I'd like to come back to for a bit of review--I'm talking to you long property hypos where you have to think about whether RAP could apply.
I did three sets, got between 38-41 on each of them, felt I was better off reviewing materials than taking more of these since they felt a bit too easy
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Flips88

- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Post
by Flips88 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:41 am
Did 2 mixed sets yesterday and got 40 and 38 on them where the target goals were 36 and 33 respectively. They are definitely a lot more straightforward than the regular ones and hopefully that's how the real MBE is. There are some questions I got wrong and learned something from it, e.g. that for mortgages life tenants pay the interest and remaindermen pay the principal.
-
MoneyMay

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 2:59 am
Post
by MoneyMay » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:11 pm
pizzasodafries wrote:alicrimson wrote:Is anyone using the mixed sets for review? I have done four, and they seem kinda silly. I mean, I read that the average for barbri testers was 67% and most of the averages on the mixed sets are 72%, but it just seems really really easy, and I don't want to be doing them if it won't be beneficial. Though, I would LOVE if they were representative of the difficulty of the MBE. Any thoughts?
Also, for timing, I like what that Rafael Guzman guy said. 17 every 30 minutes. I usually start doing this and then somehow wind up finishing around an hour early, but that is my plan in case emergencies happen on the test. That, and I plan on circling ones where I'm at WTF levels and starring ones that I'd like to come back to for a bit of review--I'm talking to you long property hypos where you have to think about whether RAP could apply.
I did three sets, got between 38-41 on each of them, felt I was better off reviewing materials than taking more of these since they felt a bit too easy
Same... I got like a 42 on one of them and haven't gone back and have been trying to just memorize my lecture handouts. PLEASE GOD LET THE REAL MBE BE LIKE THIS.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Post
by jd20132013 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:17 pm
Anyone want to talk about how they're studying for the essay stuff?
right now I'm doing something in between an outline and a full writeout of the questions. don't want to spend too much time but also need to get a feel for how to make up law.
i'm reviewing flashcards intermittently, but I feel like there are holes in the flashcard coverage. don't know if I should be reading thru the lecture handouts, but I don't really feel like i learn much from those...
-
pizzasodafries

- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:37 am
Post
by pizzasodafries » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:24 pm
jd20132013 wrote:Anyone want to talk about how they're studying for the essay stuff?
right now I'm doing something in between an outline and a full writeout of the questions. don't want to spend too much time but also need to get a feel for how to make up law.
i'm reviewing flashcards intermittently, but I feel like there are holes in the flashcard coverage. don't know if I should be reading thru the lecture handouts, but I don't really feel like i learn much from those...
I have an outline that is exactly the Handouts minus the hypos. So with these outlines I can review the handouts in half the time since at this point if you need Hypos to explain this shit your screwed on that topic.
Also going over the Hacked Essays thing a little after reviewing each topic.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
MoneyMay

- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 2:59 am
Post
by MoneyMay » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:32 pm
pizzasodafries wrote:jd20132013 wrote:Anyone want to talk about how they're studying for the essay stuff?
right now I'm doing something in between an outline and a full writeout of the questions. don't want to spend too much time but also need to get a feel for how to make up law.
i'm reviewing flashcards intermittently, but I feel like there are holes in the flashcard coverage. don't know if I should be reading thru the lecture handouts, but I don't really feel like i learn much from those...
I have an outline that is exactly the Handouts minus the hypos. So with these outlines I can review the handouts in half the time since at this point if you need Hypos to explain this shit your screwed on that topic.
Also going over the Hacked Essays thing a little after reviewing each topic.
I also have a list of rules I've made of the essays from the past 10 years. At this point I am just trying to memorize as many rules as I can, under the theory that I can bullshit my way to minimum competency if I can at least somewhat know the applicable rule.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Post
by jd20132013 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:35 pm
yep as i review the essay answers I am putting the rules into flashcards...who knows if its the best way
-
The Egyptian

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:13 am
Post
by The Egyptian » Thu Jul 24, 2014 3:37 pm
MoneyMay wrote:pizzasodafries wrote:alicrimson wrote:Is anyone using the mixed sets for review? I have done four, and they seem kinda silly. I mean, I read that the average for barbri testers was 67% and most of the averages on the mixed sets are 72%, but it just seems really really easy, and I don't want to be doing them if it won't be beneficial. Though, I would LOVE if they were representative of the difficulty of the MBE. Any thoughts?
Also, for timing, I like what that Rafael Guzman guy said. 17 every 30 minutes. I usually start doing this and then somehow wind up finishing around an hour early, but that is my plan in case emergencies happen on the test. That, and I plan on circling ones where I'm at WTF levels and starring ones that I'd like to come back to for a bit of review--I'm talking to you long property hypos where you have to think about whether RAP could apply.
I did three sets, got between 38-41 on each of them, felt I was better off reviewing materials than taking more of these since they felt a bit too easy
Same... I got like a 42 on one of them and haven't gone back and have been trying to just memorize my lecture handouts. PLEASE GOD LET THE REAL MBE BE LIKE THIS.
AMIN
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Post
by jd20132013 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:46 pm
just opened my critical pass flashcards. at this point im not going to do more than 25 mbe's a day if that. anyone who has used these can speak to their efficacy? good way to stay fresh on MBE?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
july14bar

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 1:26 pm
Post
by july14bar » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:31 pm
jd20132013 wrote:just opened my critical pass flashcards. at this point im not going to do more than 25 mbe's a day if that. anyone who has used these can speak to their efficacy? good way to stay fresh on MBE?
I think critical pass has been incredible. Comparing those to my self-made flashcards for state subjects, the difference is night and day-- in coverage and lay out/ease of use. They have everything from my Barbri outlines plus a few fairly important notes that aren't in the lecture handouts (for example, my Barbri lecture didn't cover receipt of stolen property or larceny by trick). I think they're the perfect balance between the lecture handouts and the CMR.
I really think that I'd be fine on the MBE with just critical pass and adaptibar (or the Emanuel's books). If I could have found used copies of the Barbri state essay book and CMR, I could've saved myself a few grand for bar review.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Post
by jd20132013 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:35 pm
thanks. I'll use them heavily over the next few days in lieu of problem sets
-
jrf12886

- Posts: 283
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:52 am
Post
by jrf12886 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:18 pm
MoneyMay wrote:pizzasodafries wrote:alicrimson wrote:Is anyone using the mixed sets for review? I have done four, and they seem kinda silly. I mean, I read that the average for barbri testers was 67% and most of the averages on the mixed sets are 72%, but it just seems really really easy, and I don't want to be doing them if it won't be beneficial. Though, I would LOVE if they were representative of the difficulty of the MBE. Any thoughts?
Also, for timing, I like what that Rafael Guzman guy said. 17 every 30 minutes. I usually start doing this and then somehow wind up finishing around an hour early, but that is my plan in case emergencies happen on the test. That, and I plan on circling ones where I'm at WTF levels and starring ones that I'd like to come back to for a bit of review--I'm talking to you long property hypos where you have to think about whether RAP could apply.
I did three sets, got between 38-41 on each of them, felt I was better off reviewing materials than taking more of these since they felt a bit too easy
Same... I got like a 42 on one of them and haven't gone back and have been trying to just memorize my lecture handouts. PLEASE GOD LET THE REAL MBE BE LIKE THIS.
I'm hoping to do all the mixed sets. On the first 4 sets, I got 84%, 96%, 82%, 88%.
Obviously they're easier than the other Barbri sets (to compare I got a 62% on the SFE and a 75% on the full day MBE). I really hope the real MBE questions are closer to these mixed sets...but who knows.
-
ZyzzBrah

- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:39 pm
Post
by ZyzzBrah » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:38 pm
fwiw, I've done 7 sets of the mixed questions
I thought 1-5 were easy-ish
but 6-7 were throwing me for some reason
Anyone do those free sets on barprephero? I've done a few and they are way too easy IMO--but hopefully its just because barbri uses hard questions
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
encore1101

- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:13 am
Post
by encore1101 » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:45 pm
ZyzzBrah wrote:fwiw, I've done 7 sets of the mixed questions
I thought 1-5 were easy-ish
but 6-7 were throwing me for some reason
Anyone do those free sets on barprephero? I've done a few and they are way too easy IMO--but hopefully its just because barbri uses hard questions
I did like 50 of the barprephero.. I agree, they're way too easy. They might have been good as review after lecture notes, or for learning the material, but too easy at this stage.
-
The Egyptian

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:13 am
Post
by The Egyptian » Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:50 am
encore1101 wrote:ZyzzBrah wrote:fwiw, I've done 7 sets of the mixed questions
I thought 1-5 were easy-ish
but 6-7 were throwing me for some reason
Anyone do those free sets on barprephero? I've done a few and they are way too easy IMO--but hopefully its just because barbri uses hard questions
I did like 50 of the barprephero.. I agree, they're way too easy. They might have been good as review after lecture notes, or for learning the material, but too easy at this stage.
Wow guys
Looking at the page after having my ambian/melanin to declared war on MB tom from tomorrow and from barbri + some additional reliable sources.
What's your game
-
The Egyptian

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:13 am
Post
by The Egyptian » Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:56 am
The Egyptian wrote:encore1101 wrote:ZyzzBrah wrote:fwiw, I've done 7 sets of the mixed questions
I thought 1-5 were easy-ish
but 6-7 were throwing me for some reason
Anyone do those free sets on barprephero? I've done a few and they are way too easy IMO--but hopefully its just because barbri uses hard questions
I did like 50 of the barprephero.. I agree, they're way too easy. They might have been good as review after lecture notes, or for learning the material, but too easy at this stage.
Wow guys
Looking at the page after having my ambian/melanin to declared war on MB tom from tomorrow and from barbri + some additional reliable sources.
What's your game
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is con
Law-So-Hard wrote:Flips88 wrote:Lol i did one where a guy mounted a flatscreen tv on the ceiling about his bed and "The next night, a woman who was the man’s overnight guest was seriously injured when the television came loose and fell on the bed."
I remember cringing as I got a few lines down and realized the guy seriously bolted the TV to his ceiling
Law-So-Hard wrote:Flips88 wrote:Lol i did one where a guy mounted a flatscreen tv on the ceiling about his bed and "The next night, a woman who was the man’s overnight guest was seriously injured when the television came loose and fell on the bed."
I remember cringing as I got a few lines down and realized the guy seriously bolted the TV to his ceiling
Law-So-Hard wrote:Flips88 wrote:Lol i did one where a guy mounted a flatscreen tv on the ceiling about his bed and "The next night, a woman who was the man’s overnight guest was seriously injured when the television came loose and fell on the bed."
I remember cringing as I got a few lines down and realized the guy seriously bolted the TV to his ceiling
cerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
He did it again? he was there last year too!
TV Junkie........
-
The Egyptian

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:13 am
Post
by The Egyptian » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:00 am
The Egyptian wrote:The Egyptian wrote:encore1101 wrote:ZyzzBrah wrote:fwiw, I've done 7 sets of the mixed questions
I thought 1-5 were easy-ish
but 6-7 were throwing me for some reason
Anyone do those free sets on barprephero? I've done a few and they are way too easy IMO--but hopefully its just because barbri uses hard questions
I did like 50 of the barprephero.. I agree, they're way too easy. They might have been good as review after lecture notes, or for learning the material, but too easy at this stage.
Wow guys
Looking at the page after having my ambian/melanin to declared war on MB tom from tomorrow and from barbri + some additional reliable sources.
What's your game
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is concerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
lmr wrote:On the REAL mbe false pretenses is NEVER the answer-BARBRI cost me two questions over the course of two OPE sets bc I applied their dumb logic as to what title to property was. As far as NCBE is con
Law-So-Hard wrote:Flips88 wrote:Lol i did one where a guy mounted a flatscreen tv on the ceiling about his bed and "The next night, a woman who was the man’s overnight guest was seriously injured when the television came loose and fell on the bed."
I remember cringing as I got a few lines down and realized the guy seriously bolted the TV to his ceiling
Law-So-Hard wrote:Flips88 wrote:Lol i did one where a guy mounted a flatscreen tv on the ceiling about his bed and "The next night, a woman who was the man’s overnight guest was seriously injured when the television came loose and fell on the bed."
I remember cringing as I got a few lines down and realized the guy seriously bolted the TV to his ceiling
Law-So-Hard wrote:Flips88 wrote:Lol i did one where a guy mounted a flatscreen tv on the ceiling about his bed and "The next night, a woman who was the man’s overnight guest was seriously injured when the television came loose and fell on the bed."
I remember cringing as I got a few lines down and realized the guy seriously bolted the TV to his ceiling
cerned title is more in your face than barbri led me to believe.
He did it again? he was there last year too!
TV Junkie........
I have a vision of those guys who shot the infomercial and try to connect donation on tv, take a footage about us in the exam day, and playing Lorena McKnight in the backgrounds.
Bar exam candidate in distress. We don't want your money, we just want your players......
And eeeeevvveeerrrryyy body huuuuuuuuuurts
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
sundance95

- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Post
by sundance95 » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:06 am
The ambien detail makes me think troll, but whether true our false this is 180
-
The Egyptian

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 4:13 am
Post
by The Egyptian » Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:52 am
sundance95 wrote:The ambien detail makes me think troll, but whether true our false this is 180
No. It's 190
-
RPK34

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Post
by RPK34 » Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:55 am
Ok, I'm fairly behind, but Torts Question set 5. Some employee takes a job at a mental institution with dangerous individuals. The employee doesn't read the instruction manual. Then, he leaves the door unlocked. Some dangerous person escapes, and badly injures someone. And Barbri says the employee is not negligent?
Sometimes Barbri is just a bag of suck.
-
OklahomasOK

- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:10 pm
Post
by OklahomasOK » Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:59 am
RPK34 wrote:Ok, I'm fairly behind, but Torts Question set 5. Some employee takes a job at a mental institution with dangerous individuals. The employee doesn't read the instruction manual. Then, he leaves the door unlocked. Some dangerous person escapes, and badly injures someone. And Barbri says the employee is not negligent?
Sometimes Barbri is just a bag of suck.
All StudySmart sets 5 & 6 are bags of crap. So many "oh this is a better answer" or really suspect reasoning. Especially in Torts 6, some of their Duty, Breach, Causation, Damages, logic is
really poor. Take your scores on 5 & 6 with the largest possible grain of salt. I stopped doing them because I was developing bad habits thinking novation, BER, and other red herrings were correct answers. The mixed sets are a better representation of what the actual MBE will be.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login