February 2015 Bar Exam Forum

Discussions related to the bar exam are found in this forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Dan1220

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:47 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Dan1220 » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:34 pm

Its true in a lien theory jurisdiction you can't take possession of a mortgagors property. However, if the property is abandoned by the mortgagor the mortgagee can always take possession regardless of what theory is in place.

numbertwo88

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 11:00 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by numbertwo88 » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:07 pm

fslexcduck wrote:
guest305 wrote:
fslexcduck wrote:OK another question for you guys:

Riddle me this: Do 42 bad apples spoil the bunch?
I went with no because of common industry practice.
Same. It just seemed weird. I hated the questions that took the form like "what would you do if you were his attorney?" because it's like, ok am I supposed to give the actual legal standard, or am I supposed to give advice under anything I think there is a semi-decent argument to be made for?

That came up on a couple of other questions too, like "what motion should you tell the client to make?" and it's just like well I don't think a motion to dismiss is gonna work, but an attorney should probably make it anyway...
I kept trying to tell myself I wasn't trying to be rational, I was trying to pick the law. It was very difficult to do.

User avatar
Holly Golightly

Gold
Posts: 4602
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Holly Golightly » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:24 pm

I think several civ pro questions must have been experimental because they were judgment calls.

MichBar

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:59 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by MichBar » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:55 pm

I didn't count but Civ Pro seemed to pop up on my exam far more than anything else and some of the questions were really weird.

minnbills

Gold
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by minnbills » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:13 pm

MichBar wrote:I didn't count but Civ Pro seemed to pop up on my exam far more than anything else and some of the questions were really weird.
Agreed

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Holly Golightly

Gold
Posts: 4602
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Holly Golightly » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:52 pm

Did anyone else feel like there just wasn't very much to write for most of the MEE essays?

46-and-2

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:06 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by 46-and-2 » Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:28 am

Yes. Also, had trouble setting up IRAC for one of the questions - I think it was the secured transactions one. Organizing my answer took most of my time.

User avatar
Neidermeyer

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:25 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Neidermeyer » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:12 am

In Indiana we had the MPT and 6 Indiana specific essays (civ pro, admin law, corp, secured, family law and Indiana con law). I jotted down my word count after both sections out of curiousity and was around 12,000 total. Wasn't sure how much that was until I ran it through a converter! Safe to say I don't think I left anything unanswered. Haha

YibanRen

New
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:25 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by YibanRen » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:18 am

minnbills wrote:
MichBar wrote:I didn't count but Civ Pro seemed to pop up on my exam far more than anything else and some of the questions were really weird.
Agreed
I only got around 25 Civ Pro questions. I got too many contracts and RP questions. My hunch is that each of us feels they got too many of one or two particular subjects because the test questions you get are confined to one or two topics. This would make sense because it would enable NCBEX to get a better idea of how certain questions of the same type compared to each other in difficulty. Then, they could make sure that we each got 8 easy, 8 medium, 8 hard or whatever of each question type on the real thing.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Bubbles 4 Life

Gold
Posts: 2868
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:37 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Bubbles 4 Life » Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:05 am

.
Last edited by Bubbles 4 Life on Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

EZ as AsDf

New
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 1:54 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by EZ as AsDf » Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:28 am

I felt like I answered at least 12 questions regarding contracts for the sale of land dealing with the closing date.

jsmmm9528

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:40 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by jsmmm9528 » Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:48 am

Dan1220 wrote:Its true in a lien theory jurisdiction you can't take possession of a mortgagors property. However, if the property is abandoned by the mortgagor the mortgagee can always take possession regardless of what theory is in place.
But are abandoning personal property and abandoning land the same thing? For personal property the title is lost upon abandonment, but for the land there should be additional procedure before creditor or someone else acquire the title.

you_were_driving

New
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:25 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by you_were_driving » Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:14 pm

jsmmm9528 wrote:
Dan1220 wrote:Its true in a lien theory jurisdiction you can't take possession of a mortgagors property. However, if the property is abandoned by the mortgagor the mortgagee can always take possession regardless of what theory is in place.
But are abandoning personal property and abandoning land the same thing? For personal property the title is lost upon abandonment, but for the land there should be additional procedure before creditor or someone else acquire the title.
the mortgagee doesnt acquire title simply by possession. A mortgagee in possession acts sort of like a trustee for the debtor's property until a foreclosure sale.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Neidermeyer

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:25 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Neidermeyer » Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:15 pm

jsmmm9528 wrote:
Dan1220 wrote:Its true in a lien theory jurisdiction you can't take possession of a mortgagors property. However, if the property is abandoned by the mortgagor the mortgagee can always take possession regardless of what theory is in place.
But are abandoning personal property and abandoning land the same thing? For personal property the title is lost upon abandonment, but for the land there should be additional procedure before creditor or someone else acquire the title.
You know a question is difficult when there is reasonable discourse on it after the exam where you have access to information about it. lol

jarofsoup

Gold
Posts: 2145
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by jarofsoup » Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:18 pm

I am guessing that the property would have to put into a receivership by a court process before a mortgager could enter.

deliriousxix

Bronze
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:44 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by deliriousxix » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:07 pm

OklahomasOK wrote:
MichBar wrote:Does anyone feel decent after this and have any passers reading this instinctively felt good after?

All my friends who previously passed are telling me I'm just being nuts, that they all felt this way, and that I did way better than I think. But I'm normally have a fairly decent grasp of my performance and that just felt way off. And it's not that I "think" I got a number wrong, there's a ton I know for a fact I got wrong. Obviously we all get a bunch wrong, but when nearly all the ones I can think of were wrong answers on my part, it makes me feel pretty crappy about the 60% where I was like "I guess it's this one and not that one."
I never met/ talked to/ heard of anyone who thought they did well on the MBE right after taking it. Everyone that I knew who passed generally felt pretty bad, like I did. I feel like I could have gotten 50% correct or 75% correct and neither would really shock me.

Generally, I felt like 1/3 were oddly easy, 1/3 I was about to narrow down to two choices and felt OK about my choice, 1/3 were "lol yolo" choices.

This is exactly how I feel! Hopefully the "ok" 1/3 balance out in our favor. I feel really good about the other two days of testing. If I fail the bar because of the MBE.... :(

User avatar
aquasalad

Bronze
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:18 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by aquasalad » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:09 pm

From the Conviser:
a. The Lien Theory
According to the lien theory, the mortgagee is considered the holder of a security interest only and the mortgagor is deemed the owner of the land until foreclosure. A majority of the states follow this theory, which provides that the mortgagee may not have possession before foreclosure.

Now for the kicker:
2. Mortgagor Consent and Abandonment
All states agree that the mortgagee may take possession if the mortgagor gives consent to do so, or if the mortgagor abandons the property.

MOTHER FUCKER

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Holly Golightly

Gold
Posts: 4602
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:30 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Holly Golightly » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:13 pm

Yay for guessing!

User avatar
OklahomasOK

Bronze
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:10 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by OklahomasOK » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:43 pm

aquasalad wrote:From the Conviser:
a. The Lien Theory
According to the lien theory, the mortgagee is considered the holder of a security interest only and the mortgagor is deemed the owner of the land until foreclosure. A majority of the states follow this theory, which provides that the mortgagee may not have possession before foreclosure.

Now for the kicker:
2. Mortgagor Consent and Abandonment
All states agree that the mortgagee may take possession if the mortgagor gives consent to do so, or if the mortgagor abandons the property.

MOTHER FUCKER

So... you're telling me there's still a chance I could make a 190 on the MBE?

Dan1220

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:47 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Dan1220 » Fri Feb 27, 2015 1:50 pm

Having taken the MBE twice now, I must highly recommend CriticalPass flash cards. They really covered the technical crap, succinct and on point.

MichBar

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:59 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by MichBar » Fri Feb 27, 2015 2:03 pm

While I'm glad I was apparently right about that question, it's incredibly unlikely any one of these single questions will make or break us. Most of us got a bunch wrong, got some wrong we thought we got right and will get some right that we felt we had no clue on.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Neidermeyer

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:25 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by Neidermeyer » Fri Feb 27, 2015 2:24 pm

OklahomasOK wrote:
aquasalad wrote:From the Conviser:
a. The Lien Theory
According to the lien theory, the mortgagee is considered the holder of a security interest only and the mortgagor is deemed the owner of the land until foreclosure. A majority of the states follow this theory, which provides that the mortgagee may not have possession before foreclosure.

Now for the kicker:
2. Mortgagor Consent and Abandonment
All states agree that the mortgagee may take possession if the mortgagor gives consent to do so, or if the mortgagor abandons the property.

MOTHER FUCKER

So... you're telling me there's still a chance I could make a 190 on the MBE?
Never doubted it for a second!

YibanRen

New
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 12:25 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by YibanRen » Fri Feb 27, 2015 3:24 pm

aquasalad wrote:From the Conviser:
a. The Lien Theory
According to the lien theory, the mortgagee is considered the holder of a security interest only and the mortgagor is deemed the owner of the land until foreclosure. A majority of the states follow this theory, which provides that the mortgagee may not have possession before foreclosure.

Now for the kicker:
2. Mortgagor Consent and Abandonment
All states agree that the mortgagee may take possession if the mortgagor gives consent to do so, or if the mortgagor abandons the property.

MOTHER FUCKER

Double kicker:

4. Receiverships: Most mortgages attempt to intercept the rents before foreclosure by getting a receiver appointed by the court to manage the property. Courts will generally appoint receivers for rental property showing (waste, value decreasing, insolvency).

I think this means receivership was not the right answer, because it isn't necessary. However, it is important to do after abandonment to prevent waste, or when you want to relet. So, because it was abandoned you want to prevent damage, so receiver. But, it isn't a prerequisite. So, of the question is, what must Mortgagee do, the answer is likely take possession, if the question is what can mortgagee do, then the answer is receiver.

numbertwo88

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 11:00 pm

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by numbertwo88 » Fri Feb 27, 2015 3:32 pm

The only reason I didn't pick the receivership option on the test was because of an internship in law school - a city agency dealing with basically all property law issues, and several of the properties we dealt with were placed under a receivership. The receivership option made no sense for that question when I thought about it ... and I sure as hell didn't learn that studying.

dxchpwd

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:27 am

Re: February 2015 Bar Exam

Post by dxchpwd » Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:27 pm

jarofsoup wrote:I am guessing that the property would have to put into a receivership by a court process before a mortgager could enter.

Now that make sense. I got this one wrong.
The bank will have to take possession to allow the new buyer to inspect the property. So all answers that said the bank can't take possession are simply wrong.

Mothers!

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Bar Exam Prep and Discussion Forum”