BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:11 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
I felt like both were very difficult. It's not the subject matter, the questions and answers are sometimes very oddly phrased. I found myself narrowing down to two choices and picking one over the other.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:24 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
So does anyone know what vindictive prosecution is?
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Prosecuter proceeding with a case to make someone miserable, not in good faith that there's a valid case.ReachTheBar79 wrote:So does anyone know what vindictive prosecution is?
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Rule of thumb: whenever I see an answer choice that cites some weird legal term I've never heard, I eliminate it.ReachTheBar79 wrote:So does anyone know what vindictive prosecution is?
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 4:35 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
I thought the opposite. AM was fine for me, PM felt much harderrinkrat19 wrote:Morning of the MBE felt pretty rough to me. What say you all?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:58 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Overall: Easier than July.
For me: My PM was easier.
Guy next me said AM was easier.
Are they swapped alternating or is everyone's AM the same as everyone else's? Anyone know.
For me: My PM was easier.
Guy next me said AM was easier.
Are they swapped alternating or is everyone's AM the same as everyone else's? Anyone know.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
To me this was the hardest MBE. My afternoon was brutal
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:30 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Agreed. PM was a killer today.DueProcessDoWheelies wrote:I thought the opposite. AM was fine for me, PM felt much harderrinkrat19 wrote:Morning of the MBE felt pretty rough to me. What say you all?
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:29 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Checking in.
My AM session wasn't bad, finished with good amount of time left (20-30 min)
PM session was much harder and only had like 5 min left. Felt like I was narrowing down a lot of them, but was still guessing on the remaining answer choices.
Overall, easier than July. Hopefully it translates into passing.
My AM session wasn't bad, finished with good amount of time left (20-30 min)
PM session was much harder and only had like 5 min left. Felt like I was narrowing down a lot of them, but was still guessing on the remaining answer choices.
Overall, easier than July. Hopefully it translates into passing.
Same man. AM felt like the stuff I had been studying. PM felt way more foreign.DueProcessDoWheelies wrote:I thought the opposite. AM was fine for me, PM felt much harderrinkrat19 wrote:Morning of the MBE felt pretty rough to me. What say you all?
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:24 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Hey guys. So can Congress require that the President cannot remove someone from an agency absent fed approval? I think I'm asking this correctly....
- Diceman102
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:47 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
I sort of remember this question. I don't think Congress can limit a president's removal power. Only restriction is on confirmation.ReachTheBar79 wrote:Hey guys. So can Congress require that the President cannot remove someone from an agency absent fed approval? I think I'm asking this correctly....
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:24 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
I put what you said, but at first wasn't sure if it was congress that couldn't limit the pres or the pres who can't limit congress!Diceman102 wrote:I sort of remember this question. I don't think Congress can limit a president's removal power. Only restriction is on confirmation.ReachTheBar79 wrote:Hey guys. So can Congress require that the President cannot remove someone from an agency absent fed approval? I think I'm asking this correctly....
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
About the guy who missed a vessel because the tire of his car broke down due to some defect. Because of this he couldn't make the money he was expecting had he caught the vessel. He didn't suffer any physical injuries. He is now suing the wheel manufacturer for damages based on the lost income expectations. Strict liability?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Diceman102
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:47 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
From what I rem, I don't think strict prod liability covers purely economic loss, only injury to person or his property.Abbeymubby wrote:About the guy who missed a vessel because the tire of his car broke down due to some defect. Because of this he couldn't make the money he was expecting had he caught the vessel. He didn't suffer any physical injuries. He is now suing the wheel manufacturer for damages based on the lost income expectations. Strict liability?
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:27 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Diceman102 wrote:From what I rem, I don't think strict prod liability covers purely economic loss, only injury to person or his property.Abbeymubby wrote:About the guy who missed a vessel because the tire of his car broke down due to some defect. Because of this he couldn't make the money he was expecting had he caught the vessel. He didn't suffer any physical injuries. He is now suing the wheel manufacturer for damages based on the lost income expectations. Strict liability?
Hopefully that is right, because that is the answer choice I picked even though I was very tempted to pick a different answer choice.
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:27 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
ReachTheBar79 wrote:So does anyone know what vindictive prosecution is?
I think that is the wrong answer because from what I remember, vindctive prosecution is so so very hard to prove in real life.
- MrMustache
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:41 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
the PM session felt a LOT harder than AM. I had something like 30 questions I was pretty much guessing on because I couldn't decide between two answers, and in the AM session I think I had maybe 5.
Not that it means the answers I felt I knew the answer to were actually correct. Will be hoping for a nice curve, because I really need some extra points for my PT fuck-up.
Not that it means the answers I felt I knew the answer to were actually correct. Will be hoping for a nice curve, because I really need some extra points for my PT fuck-up.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
About the vindictive prosecution, there was an answer choice that state lacked jurisdiction to try boyfriend for battery
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:24 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Yeah but the bf moved back home so I figured there would be at least general PJ. Idk. Missed that one.Abbeymubby wrote:About the vindictive prosecution, there was an answer choice that state lacked jurisdiction to try boyfriend for battery
- rcharter1978
- Posts: 4740
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:49 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
So, the guy to the right and left of me in the morning were just tearing through the MBE's, but they both went much slower in the PM session. I think I went much faster in the PM session, but my AM session was the worst.jamescastle wrote:Overall: Easier than July.
For me: My PM was easier.
Guy next me said AM was easier.
Are they swapped alternating or is everyone's AM the same as everyone else's? Anyone know.
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:27 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
ReachTheBar79 wrote:Yeah but the bf moved back home so I figured there would be at least general PJ. Idk. Missed that one.Abbeymubby wrote:About the vindictive prosecution, there was an answer choice that state lacked jurisdiction to try boyfriend for battery
Yeah I was heading down that road of analysis, but then I remembered it was a criminal prosecution, not a civil case, so I think general jurisdiction doesn't count? So I said state has no jurisdiction to prosecute bf
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Diceman102
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:47 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
I said the same because the other answers seemed incorrect to me, especially vindictive prosecution6TimeFailure wrote:ReachTheBar79 wrote:Yeah but the bf moved back home so I figured there would be at least general PJ. Idk. Missed that one.Abbeymubby wrote:About the vindictive prosecution, there was an answer choice that state lacked jurisdiction to try boyfriend for battery
Yeah I was heading down that road of analysis, but then I remembered it was a criminal prosecution, not a civil case, so I think general jurisdiction doesn't count? So I said state has no jurisdiction to prosecute bf
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:38 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
Truejamescastle wrote:Note to first time MBE takers: You are (Not) Prepared.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
I selected the same answer too out of desperation because everything else didn't add up.
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:58 am
Re: BarBri Bar Review Hangout - February 2016 Exam
That was a reference to Evangelion if anyone caught it btw.Chueyx1289 wrote:Truejamescastle wrote:Note to first time MBE takers: You are (Not) Prepared.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login